Obenshain: The Real Story Behind SB 1195

by Senator Mark Obenshain

Over the past three weeks, my staff and I have been in discussion regarding Senate Bill 1195, sponsored by Senator Richard Stuart (R-Stafford).  This bill raised a number of concerns, and it was clear that we needed more information on its background and what this bill sought to accomplish.  People might forget, but I come from a farm family, and we still have a family farm in southwest Virginia.  Now representing the number one agricultural district in Virginia, I take to heart any threat to farmers or the Ag industry.

Here’s the history.  Several years ago, in response to e coli outbreaks in spinach and the salmonella outbreak in peanut butter, Congress passed the Food Safety Modernization Act.  Carving out hundreds of thousands of exemptions, this bill required federal investigators – the FDA – to inspect and oversee very large produce and fruit farms across the country.  In January of 2016, the FDA released final rule implementing the law, the regulations and exemptions.  Make no mistake, I believe that these Obama regulations are a typical bureaucratic overreaction by the federal government and should be repealed by the Trump administration.

The FDA regulations give the states a choice with respect to enforcement.  Virginia (as with other states) could opt-in and do inspections ourself, but if we don’t, the FDA inspectors will come into Virginia and do it themselves.  If Virginia does the inspections, they will be done by the Virginia Department of Agriculture (VDACS).  I don’t think we should have either doing these inspections, but the small number of farms that are subject to the regulations (less than 1% of Virginia’s farms) actually asked for legislation designating VDACS in order to the keep the FDA off of Virginia farms.  They, too, don’t want anyone doing it, but because the Obama administration has made them pick their poison, they picked VDACS.  Farms like the Saunders Brothers, who’ve been operating their family owned farm and orchard for 102 years near Wintergreen, who told us: “We would rather have [a] state regulatory agency (VDACS) have this authority versus [the] FDA.”

As a result, the Ag industry asked for SB 1195.  As introduced, however, the bill went way too far.  It had civil and even criminal penalties.  I did not and would not support that.  It also had no sunset provisions.  I would not support that either.

It’s important to note that since the FSMA passed, more than 40 other states have chosen to conduct their own inspections instead of defaulting to FDA inspections.  Most of those giving way to federal regulation are states with very little produce and fruit production, like Montana and North Dakota.

It is clear that nobody in Virginia’s farm community is happy that the federal government is forcing Virginia to make this choice and they are all hoping that the Trump Administration will promptly repeal the regs.  But even more concerning is the possibility and reality of submitting ourselves solely to FDA regulation.  Late last year, the federal regulators notified one western Virginia farm operation that it would be inspected, and that it would be prohibited from selling its product until the FDA arrived at the farm for its scheduled inspection two weeks later.  As you might have guessed, two weeks have now turned into three months, and they have yet to see anyone from the FDA, and they are still unable to sell their product.

This is an issue facing Virginia now, and while SB 1195 only applies to a small number of farms, it is still an immediate threat by the federal government.

SB 1195 as it was originally drafted wasn’t perfect.  As many folks shared their opinion, it became clear that bill needed amending.  Martha Boneta reached out to VDACS and agricultural groups, and suggested major amendments that were added to the bill in committee:

1) Sunset Clause.  If the federal regulations are repealed, defunded or ruled unconstitutional, the Virginia bill goes away with it.

2) Exemptions.  SB 1195 has been stripped down so that it applies to only one percent of Virginia’s farms – which is still too many.

Even with these amendments, I still had concerns.  The Obama scheme seems to call for both civil fines, as well as criminal charges when violations were found.  Any fine levied would be collected and retained by VDACS – potentially creating an incentive for the agency to aggressively pursue violators.  Neither sat well with me, and in committee I requested two additional amendments:

1) I offered an amendment stripping out any possibility of a criminal prosecution under the law.  It is a gross overreach to threaten farmers with jail time.

2) While there are some great folks at VDACS, we shouldn’t entertain the risk of encouraging them to find violations to supplement their coffers.  To avoid any threat of impropriety, I offered an amendment that would prevent VDACS from retaining any civil fines.  Instead, any fines would be redirected to help fund farmers’ efforts to implement best management practices.

There have been some concerns about unannounced inspections.  Unannounced inspections are common – this is similar to how a surprise health inspection at a restaurant is allowed into the kitchen, or OSHA comes unannounced to inspect a factory.  I do recognize, however, there are certainly many things to dislike about this Obama scheme being forced on the states, and hopefully the Trump administration repeals the FSMA at the earliest opportunity.

In short, we passed a bill that attempts to protect all Virginia farmers from overaggressive regulators – state or federal – and from the issuance of cease-and-desist orders from the FDA.  We ensured that the second the federal mandate goes away, the Virginia program expires as well.  We removed the threat of jail time, and we made sure VDACS wouldn’t have the incentive to find or invent fines to give themselves some more money.  Most importantly, we worked to protect Virginia farmers from the long arm and heavy hand of the federal government.

Senator Mark Obenshain is a Republican representing the Shenandoah Valley’s 26th Senate District.

  • I have earned 104,000 bucks previous year by doing an on-line job a­­n­­d I did that by wo­rking in my own time f­o­r few hours a day. I was following work model I was introduced by this web-site i found online and I am excited that i made so much extra income. It’s so beginner-friendly a­n­d I am just so happy that i found this. Check out what I do… http://statictab.com/msxjhtx

  • Conservative Voter

    So it’s a bill to let the government on private property without a warrant then.

    Constitution of Virginia

    Article I. Bill of Rights

    Section 10. General warrants of search or seizure prohibited

    That general warrants, whereby an officer or messenger may be commanded to search suspected places without evidence of a fact committed, or to seize any person or persons not named, or whose offense is not particularly described and supported by evidence, are grievous and oppressive, and ought not to be granted.

    See, Commonwealth of Virginia’s Oath of Office …

    http://reactionensp.weebly.com/uploads/4/2/4/6/42469671/9675664_orig.png

    • Robert Kenyon

      Spot on. This bill should be defeated.

      • So you prefer the federal government doing surprise inspections of Virginia farms?

        • Conservative Voter

          Another response that is not an argument against the Commonwealth’s Constitutional prohibition against these kinds of general warrants.

          • They’re not general warrants. In order to run a farm and sell produce, you’re generally required to abide by state and federal regulations on the food industry. That includes allowing inspectors onto your property.

          • Conservative Voter

            Yes, yes, and the EPA should be able to inspect runoff, and ICE for illegal immigrants, and the IRS for hidden assets, and Labor for working conditions, and OSHA for safety, and blah blah blah, because circular logic and the good of humanity.

            Some of us think the best thing for humanity is classical liberal ideas such as private property rights.

          • It’s not circular logic. This is standard commerce clause jurisprudence. This isn’t even questionable like some of these things are. You want the ability to sell your produce to the public, you’re consenting to regulation.

          • Conservative Voter

            And to think, only a hundred years ago we were the party arguing that FDR couldn’t tell farmers what and what not to grow. Amazing.

          • A lot has changed in a hundred years.

      • Turbocohen

        So now the Tea Party is Pro IRS, celebrates debt limit increases, higher taxes and Rino’s? All Hail to more Federal Government overreach into Virginia? 40+ other states are dumb and we are smart to be one of the few to leave our crotch open to the FDA, not that the other Ag states have voted to return the responsibility back to their state?

        Never, not once have I ever been sideways with my Tea Party friends but this is the biggest fustercluck bat shit dain-bramaged pot of-owl dung seeing my political friends say No to a bill that limits, and may eliminate federal abuse of large farmers. And the FDA has their eye on Organic farmers, they are next. Screw them too?

        A NO vote to the Obenshain amended version of SB1195, as demanded by my very own TEA Party alliance send a statewide Fuck You to farmers.

        Carol Stopps, love ya dear but you have dug your heels into an epoxy filled pit and you lost your slippers on this one.

        • Conservative Voter

          Interesting point of view, but nowhere do you make an argument about how this bill is not in opposition to the Commonwealth’s Constitutional prohibition against these kinds of general warrants. You’re just justifying it by saying the alternative is worse.

          See Writ of Assistance

          • MD Russ

            Do you even know what a General Warrant is? I doubt it, based on your comments here. You sound to me like one of those anti-tax zealots who claim that there is no obligation to pay Federal income tax because we have a voluntary income tax system.

            No wonder Trump got elected. Idiot.

          • Conservative Voter

            Yes I’m an idiot and don’t know what I’m talking about, that’s why you’re so mad.

    • MD Russ

      Nonsense. We ave a host of Federal, state, and local laws and regulations devoted to the healthiness of farm products as well as sanitation laws that govern grocery stores and restaurants. Do you really believe that the Constitution gives you the right to produce food that can poison people?

      • Conservative Voter

        That’s not an argument against the Commonwealth’s Constitutional prohibition against general warrants.

    • MD Russ

      Why are you recommending your own comment?

      • Conservative Voter

        This is also not an argument against the Commonwealth’s Constitutional prohibition against general warrants.

  • Susan Sili

    Many thanks to Senator Obenshain for the explanation of this bill and for contributing to Bearing Drift. I was recently in a meeting with farmers who supply our county food bank and they were aware of the bill and told me, this is actually what they asked for instead of subjecting to federal inspections and understood that while not the ideal solution, the issue had to be addressed. It looks like great care and attention have been taken to make a complicated situation less difficult. Thank you again Senator for reaching out to communicate the issue and for your work on the bill.

    • Turbocohen

      Susan unfortunately some have zero interest in getting the facts first hand and mission creep has taken over agendas.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.