John Stuart Mill — sometimes touted as a friend of liberty — shows us the real consequence of a state-sponsored distribution of property.
“It would be possible for the state to guarantee employment at ample wages to all who are born. But if it does this, it is bound in self-protection, and for the sake of every purpose for which government exists, to provide that no person shall be born without its consent…. Society [i.e., in this case, the state] can feed the necessitous, if it takes their multiplication under its control; or (if destitute of all moral feeling for the wretched offspring) it can leave the last to their discretion, abandoning the first to their own care. But it cannot with impunity take the feeding upon itself, and leave the multiplying free.”
Discuss.
Andrew Schwartz is a Bearing Drift contributor.