OK, several Republican candidates are angry at Mitt Romney (and Democrats are gleeful) because he took over companies drowing in debt, bleeding cash, and heavily bloated in personnel; he then rescued them in a number of cases by letting employees go and shutting down unproductive business functions (among other things).
Meanwhile, whoever is elected President in November will take over an enterprise that is drowning in $15 trillion of debt, bleeding over $1 trillion a year, involved in several unproductive functions, and heavily bloated in personnel . . .
. . . and Romney’s private sector experience is a bad thing?
More to the point, shouldn’t supporters of limited government jump at the chance of electing a President who talks about the joy of firing people? Isn’t this exactly what we need?
Just sayin’
