Candidates respond to the RPV debate invitation
By Norman Leahy | Monday, November 14th, 2011 | Politics, VirginiaThe responses to the RPV’s decision to stage three debates next year among the U.S. Senate candidates are rolling in. But they are remarkably different in tone and outlook.
Consider this one, from Jamie Radtke, which says in part:
The great news is you’ve helped me win a CHANCE [caps in original] to confront George Allen at three Republican debates about his record of higher debt and spending in the U.S. Senate.
Right now, though, I need your help in meeting the criteria to join those debates as soon as possible. Please read on so I can explain.
Late Thursday afternoon, the Republican Party of Virginia (RPV) announced it will hold three Republican U.S. Senate debates before next year’s June primary. This is great news, but we have two challenges before us to ensure a real opportunity to hold George Allen accountable for turning his back on Republican principles in the U.S. Senate.
For one, we want to ensure the format that will permit a real debate about Allen’s horrible record (more on that later.) The more urgent priority for our campaign is to meet RPV’s criteria for being in the debates, which will require our state-wide organization to gather several thousand petition signatures to get my name on the ballot. This is an expensive, state-wide, time-consuming process. I need your help right now to begin that activity.
It then becomes a fundraising appeal. And another opportunity to beat George Allen about the head and shoulders.
But then we have this from Tim Donner’s campaign:
“I welcome the opportunity provided by the RPV, which will at last give the citizens of Virginia a chance to decide for themselves who should be the party’s standard bearer, rather than being spoon fed by the media,” Donner said. “I certainly hope that George Allen will also participate, so Virginians can see for themselves the difference between my specific plans for authentic conservative leadership, as opposed to his senate record of expansion of the size and scope of government.”
That’s the bulk of the notice. No pitch for funds, no anti-Allen slant.
Then we have this from Allen’s camp, in the form of a letter to RPV chairman Pat Mullins from campaign manager Mike Thomas:
This upcoming 2012 election will be pivotal in determining the future of our country. George Allen believes it is essential for Republicans to discuss solutions to the important issues affecting Virginia families and businesses. We accept your invitation to continue that conversation in the three debates sponsored by the Republican Party of Virginia.
The failed policies of President Obama, Chairman Tim Kaine and their Democrat allies in Washington have put our country on a dangerous path of sustained high unemployment, massive debt and diminished opportunities for future generations. Thank you for this opportunity. We look forward to discussing our positive solutions for Virginians and our Country.
Mostly boilerplate, but containing the very Virginia “thank you” for the invitation.
The essential difference, though, is no mention of the other candidates. The focus, instead, is on Tim Kaine and the national Democrats.
Each approach is, in its own way, very revealing. Now have at them…
Tags:
About the author
Norm Leahy has written about Virginia and national politics online since 2002, beginning with One Man's Trash (OMT), and continuing through Bacon's Rebellion (both the blog and the e-zine), Sic Semper Tyrannis, NBC12's Decision Virginia, Richmond.com and Tertium Quids. He is the chief blogger at "The Score" and a producer of "The Score" radio show as well as being a Washington Post contributor.







Comments
2 Responses to "Candidates respond to the RPV debate invitation"
“Each approach is, in its own way, very revealing. Now have at them…”
Okay, here it is – Radke just giving her usual dumping on her former employer with abandon, follwed by begging so she can continue her spend-a-thon. Tell her to sell that stupid bus.
Donner continues to be a class act and wants to present his own ideas, and Allen can’t even make his own response – just some puppetmaster running his campaign.
Yes, these responses are very revealing.
What, did you expect something different than the usual approach from each of these? After the recent revelations about Congress-critters using inside info to make big bucks in stock trades, it has finally become apparent WHY so many want to be elected to, basically, “underpaid” positions. That’s where the money is!
Leave your response
The comments section is for meaningful discussion. Readers are reminded to post comments that are germane to the article and write in a common language that steers clear of personal attacks and/or vulgarities.
Please take a moment to review our comment policy.