Victory! Fluvanna blogger vindicated for use of county seal
By Lynn R. Mitchell | Monday, September 5th, 2011 | Politics, VirginiaFluvanna County supervisors were wrong when they passed an ordinance preventing a local blogger from using the county seal. A federal judge ruled that 23-year-old Bryan Rothamel’s First Amendment rights were violated.
It was a bizarre case to begin with – after all, don’t the citizens of a county “own” the seal, not the supervisors? Alerted by Shaun Kenney, a long-time blogger, Bearing Drift colleague, and vice chairman of the board of supervisors, the Rutherford Institute stepped in to defend what appeared to be clearly a First Amendment violation.
In January I wrote in the Washington Examiner:
It all began when a local blogger, 23-year-old Bryan Rothamel who writes The FLUCO Blog, used the county seal on articles he wrote to keep the community updated about supervisor meetings, activities, and decisions. The problem, according to the supervisors, was that he didn’t have permission to use the county seal to illustrate those posts and, they added, he was using the seal to “advertise his product.”
To rememdy the problem, in September the board made it a Class 1 misdemeanor to violate the law punishable by up to 12 months in jail and/or a fine up to $2,500, noting that “[n]o person, entity or organization shall exhibit, display, or in any manner utilize the seal or any copy, replication, facsimile or representation of the seal, . . ., unless such use shall have been expressly authorized by the board of supervisors.”
Kenney was the lone vote against the new law, according to Tasha Cates at the The Daily Progress:
[Kenney] said that he thinks the ordinance was a “remedial action” against the blogger for writing something that a supervisor didn’t agree with.
“This seems like a simple First Amendment, slam dunk, common sense situation,” Kenney said. “I’m still appalled, with all of the other issues facing us in Fluvanna County, that somehow we chose to focus on this.”
Now Charlottesville’s Rutherford Institute, a civil liberties organization, has come in to represent the blogger, filing a lawsuit on his behalf as noted by their president on the website:
“Criminalizing First Amendment activities is a grotesque violation of our constitutional right to free expression,” said John W. Whitehead, president of The Rutherford Institute. “Government officials should know better. Such censorship has no place in a free society.”
Was Mr. Rothamel singled out by the supervisors? Other news organizations routinely use the county seal when writing about Fluvanna.
Read more from Sharon C. Fitzgerald’s updated article at The Daily Progress.
Cross-posted at SWAC Girl
Tags:
About the author
As SWAC Girl (an acronym for Staunton, Waynesboro, and Augusta County), Lynn has been writing in the Virginia political blogosphere since 2006. Active in area politics, she has coordinated campaigns and served in leadership for the past decade. The Shenandoah Valley of Virginia is one of the most beautiful places to call home ... the Republican Party carries her beliefs.







Comments
3 Responses to "Victory! Fluvanna blogger vindicated for use of county seal"
This is a huge win for those that believe in the first amendment. The notion that a government can come after political observers merely because they don’t appreciate the spotlight – and attempt to find arbitrary and indiscriminate ways to prosecute said observer – is anathema to anyone who values free speech.
I hope the rest of the BOS didn’t spend the $2,500 they thought was a slam dunk. Kudos to you Shaun for supporting a small but meaningful victory for this young man!
Thank goodness for the victory. It is extremely frustrating that a lawsuit was necessary to vindicate the Constitutional right in this instance.
Leave your response
The comments section is for meaningful discussion. Readers are reminded to post comments that are germane to the article and write in a common language that steers clear of personal attacks and/or vulgarities.
Please take a moment to review our comment policy.