Norfolk to double referendom signature requirements
By | Monday, November 16th, 2009 | Policy

Vivian Paige caught Norfolk’s City Council trying to double the signatures required for citizens to put a referendum on the ballot. Currently, you need at least 4,000. The public hearing to change that minimum to 8,000 is Tuesday. Nice, huh?

That’s almost the entire voting population of Norfolk in the last municipal election. Someone in the city thinks it’s pretty unlikely to get 100% of municipal voters to agree on much of anything, so the move to require all of them to sign a petition isn’t surprising, nor is it out of character.

It is shameful, though. Also up for a vote is elimination of a recall procedure.

Looks like May’s election for Norfolk City Council could be decided by tomorrow’s public hearing. Wonder who on Council will step up and pull these offensive anti-citizen initiatives?


Tags:

Contribute for Conservatism!

Share this post

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed
  • Share this post on Delicious
  • StumbleUpon this post
  • Share this post on Digg
  • Tweet about this post
  • Share this post on Mixx
  • Share this post on Technorati
  • Share this post on Facebook
  • Share this post on NewsVine
  • Share this post on Reddit
  • Share this post on Google
  • Share this post on LinkedIn

About the author

Brian Kirwin

The right wants to jeer him. The left wants to censor him. Moderates usually want both. Brian Kirwin is a political consultant and public relations strategist in Virginia Beach with a lightning-rod flair. Brian also serves on the VB Arts & Humanities Commission and frequently appears on Hampton Roads theatrical stages, if only to prove that all actors aren’t liberals. Kirwin’s columns stir up debate and hit the political scene with no punches pulled.

Comments

2 Responses to "Norfolk to double referendom signature requirements"
  1. NORFOLK ALERT: Proposed charter changes « VIVIAN J. PAIGE | All Politics is Local November 16, 2009 14:07 pm

    [...] Brian over at Bearing Drift points out that requiring 8,000 signatures is almost as many votes as were cast in the last [...]

  2. Jason Sadler November 20, 2009 12:11 pm

    Why bother increasing it?

    We had a ref in VB on light rail and shot it down. CitCounc went through with it anyway, paying over double per mile for NS ROW than Norfolk did. Break out the rainy day fund…

Leave your response

Please take a moment to review our comment policy.