Could Big Labor Spoil Creigh Deeds’ chances?
By Krystle Weeks | Monday, October 19th, 2009 | PoliticsRight now, there is no question that labor unions have been active in the Virginia statewide races this year. Creigh Deeds has received numerous contributions from the AFSCME, SEIU, AFL-CIO, and other labor unions. With these contributions, one has to wonder if big labor has the capacity to spoil Creigh Deeds’ chances to become Governor.
Kimberley Strassel of The Wall Street Journal had a great op-ed piece on Friday that examines how the labor unions’ impact on the Virginia elections. Strassel points out that voters do not hold favorable opinions of the unions, especially with the recent ACORN scandal, the bailouts of the auto industry in Detroit, and the special health care provisions that are included in the legislation drafted by Congress. The article also mentioned both the Gallup and U.S. Chamber of Commerce polls, which indicate the public dissent on unions.
“In September, Gallup reported that labor had taken a “significant image hit in the past year.” For the first time in 73 years of polling on the question, only a minority of Americans approved of unions (48%)—down from nearly 60% a year ago. A majority of Americans are instead now of the opinion that unions “hurt the U.S. economy.” Approval among political independents dropped a stunning 20 points, to 44%, in just one year.
A U.S. Chamber of Commerce poll in August suggests Virginians are similarly down on unions. Some 49% of registered Virginia voters said issues relating to unions and union organizing would be very important or extremely important to their decision for governor—though not in ways unions might wish. A full 65% said Virginia needs to keep employee unions out of state government; 54% want to keep Virginia’s bar on collective bargaining for government employees. Asked specifically about Mr. Deeds’s promise to be a “partner” to unions, 51% had a negative reaction; only 26% felt positive.”
Could Virginians also be concerned about what might happen if our Right to Work law was removed? States without a right to work law have significantly higher unemployment rates, due to businesses relocating to states with right to work legislation in place. For example, Michigan is a state without a right to work law, and unemployment is at 15.3% statewide. The unions (the UAW) have devastated the state’s economy and have driven business out of the state.
Perhaps, this is on the minds of many Virginians, since unemployment continues to rise (especially in Southside Virginia, where unemployment is at 22%). They want a Governor, who will keep the right to work legislation in place and bring more jobs to the Commonwealth. Virginians do not need a Governor, who will partner with the labor unions to get their goals accomplished.
Tags:
About the author
Growing up in Maryland typically does not yield a Republican. Fortunately, Krystle Weeks was one of the lucky few booted to the Commonwealth for her staunch conservative views. From an early age, she has been debating politics, and since 2006, she has been involved here in the Commonwealth helping Republican candidates to victory. Aside from politics, Krystle is a runner and a dynamite cook. You can email her here. Krystle also blogs at Crystal Clear Conservative and Charm Offensive Cooking.







Comments
2 Responses to "Could Big Labor Spoil Creigh Deeds’ chances?"
[...] If you think for a minute that Creigh Deeds will not end the right to work law, you are wrongly mistaken. When Creigh Deeds announced his candidacy for Governor in 2008, he promised the labor unions that they would have a friend in him. I also touched on this over at Bearing Drift. [...]
Virginia Unemployment Trends – September 2009
Virginia Unemployment Trends Visualized as a Heat Map:
Virginia Unemployment in September 2009 (BLS data)
http://www.localetrends.com/st/va_virginia_unemployment.php?MAP_TYPE=curr_ue
versus Virginia Unemployment Levels 1 year ago
http://www.localetrends.com/st/va_virginia_unemployment.php?MAP_TYPE=m12_ue
Leave your response
The comments section is for meaningful discussion. Readers are reminded to post comments that are germane to the article and write in a common language that steers clear of personal attacks and/or vulgarities.
Please take a moment to review our comment policy.