Wolf to Holder – strike three
By JR Hoeft | Thursday, May 14th, 2009 | PolicyRep. Frank Wolf just wants some simple answers to some simple questions from U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder.
Beginning in March, Wolf sent a detailed letter to Holder inquiring about the nature of the detainee transfer from Guantanamo to Virginia.
Wolf now has more questions for the justice head:
“I have grave concerns that you are playing fast and loose with the definition of “terrorist” and may be misleading the American people regarding its plans to release the Uyghur detainees into the U.S. Let me be very clear – the Uyghurs held at Guantanamo Bay are trained terrorists and members or associates of the Eastern Turkistan Islamic Movement (ETIM), a designated terrorist group affiliated with al Qaeda, as designated by both the U.S. government and the United Nations (U.N.). Whether their intended victims were Chinese or Americans, a trained terrorist is a terrorist.”
Wolf also raises questions in his recent correspondence as to why the AG has been prohibiting staff from the FBI, Marshals Service and Department of Homeland Security from coming to brief him.
To track the timeline of how the AG’s office is slow-rolling Congress, read Letter 1, Letter 2, and Letter 3.
I thought this was supposed to be the most transparent administration in history?
Tags:
About the author
Conservative to the core; liberal with his opinion! J.R. has been involved in politics for over a decade and has worked on several campaigns in Hampton Roads. He has served on the Executive Committee of the Republican Party of Chesapeake and the Central Committee of the Republican Party of Virginia. He is also the director of “Blogs United” in Virginia. E-mail J.R.. Follow J.R. on Twitter.








Comments
One Response to "Wolf to Holder – strike three"
[...] congressional delegation have proposed legislation preventing the move and have been requesting more information from Attorney General Eric Holder for more than two [...]
Leave your response
The comments section is for meaningful discussion. Readers are reminded to post comments that are germane to the article and write in a common language that steers clear of personal attacks and/or vulgarities.
Please take a moment to review our comment policy.