Forbes: AIG Outrage
By Guest Post | Friday, March 20th, 2009 | PolicyAIG Outrage
By Congressman Randy Forbes
Imagine a situation where a husband goes out one day and, in the midst of the current economic situation, decides to buy an expensive new boat. A few weeks later, the bill comes in the mail. His wife opens the bill, steaming as she realizes what he’s done and sees the monthly payment they will now have to make on top of all of their other monthly commitments. As her husband walks into the room, she throws the bill across the table demanding an explanation. Her husband looks down at the bill. Realizing he can’t make the payments and seeing how mad his wife is, he pounds his first on the table and says angrily, “Honey, I am outraged over this bill that we have to pay!”
This situation seems like a scene we’d find ourselves watching on a Thursday evening sitcom. In reality, it is what we found ourselves watching on the news this week as Members of Congress and members of the Administration pounded their fists and cried “outrage” over taxpayer-funded bonuses that went to AIG executives. In fact, the word “outrage” was used in almost every speech on this issue on the House floor this week.
As I watched those Members express “outrage,” I couldn’t help but be irritated about their outrage. I am one of only 17 out of 435 Members of Congress who voted against every single one of the so-called bailout and stimulus packages under both Presidents Bush and Obama. I did so for the very reason that there was no accountability over where the money would actually go. Without accountability and transparency, we will have waste, fraud, and abuse. In fact, there was not even time to read most of the bills before leadership rushed to pass them.
Over the past several months, those 17 of us have been calling for more legislative analysis and debate over the bailout bills, and trying to ask intelligent questions about them. At the same time, the Members who have been expressing “outrage” this week were the ones ignoring the rules, rushing bills through by sidestepping the legislative process, and trying to convince the American people that the world was going to come to an end if we didn’t immediately pass each bailout or stimulus package.
Americans have every right to be angry that their money – money meant to be creating jobs and stabilizing the economy – will instead by used to pay more than $165 million in executive bonuses at AIG. This is on top of the revelation over the weekend that roughly half of the taxpayer money spent to rescue AIG was passed on to European banks and politically connected Wall Street investment firms in the first three-and-a-half months of the government bailout.
Americans also have every right to be angry at Congress expressing outrage over a problem it created itself. If individual Members of Congress would have just read the bills, they would have likely realized what most of the analysts have been telling us – that it would take thousands of government bureaucrats simply to monitor where the bailout money is actually going and how it is being spent.
Just as the husband couldn’t realistically expect his expression of outrage to cover for his own irresponsible purchase, Members of Congress cannot expect their outrage to be some type of “Get Out of Political Hot Water Free” card. The American people deserve better. They deserve analysis and debate in Washington. Indeed, it is time that Members of Congress start asking four basic questions before rushing to pass bailout and stimulus legislation:
1. Where is the money actually going?
2. How do we know it is going to get where it supposed to go?
3. Will it actually work once it arrives?
4. How will we pay it back?
I am confident if these questions were asked, there would be more than 17 out of 435 of us standing up against the bailout packages. While we can’t redo the mistakes of the past, we can learn from its lessons. Next week, I will begin outlining the principles I believe should guide America’s leaders through our current economic situation – principles that will help open the debate on these issues, put an end to the bailout madness, and put us on an effective course towards economic recovery.
Tags:









We're 75% there! Thank you to everyone who has so far contributed! Just $2000 to go!
Comments
2 Responses to "Forbes: AIG Outrage"
While you are at it, can you see why all those banks we taxpayers helped don’t seem to want to help us. Leeches like Citicorp indignantly throw people out of their homes, then bundle those houses into packages and sell them to speculators, you know the same speculators that Congress claimed would get no help, for 25 cents on the dollar. Then those houses are flipped on the open market for a hundred percent profit, which in turn exacerbates the problem with cratering house prices and lowered local tax revenues .
The result is that even responsible homeowners are forced to choose between walking away or financial disaster, cities and states face insolvency, and the banks we bailed out are losing billions in critical cash flow to get them off the dole. Yet all we see is Congress whining about an executive bonus package that they authorized through incompetence, while the same profiteers who helped bid house prices to unaffordable levels make out like bandits in it’s crash.
Congressman Forbes wrote:
“In fact, there was not even time to read most of the bills before leadership rushed to pass them.”
Congressman Forbes,
With your appropriate incredulousness over the bailouts and your placing specific causation of some of the problems now being felt to the issue of congress members not having ample time to read the bailout and stimulus bills, may I please direct your attention to the
Read the Bills Act http://www.downsizedc.org/etp/campaigns/27
and the
One Subject at a Time Act ttp://www.downsizedc.org/etp/campaigns/83
Perhaps you will do the right thing and sponsor or co-Sponsor these badly needed bills. Only you and congressmen like you, can do what is necessary to ensure that the people’s need for transparency in legislation exists. These two simple bills will accomplish the issue of giving the People the guarantees they need that the government will not have an easy time passing laws that are hurtful to the country.
Please consider taking this matter on as a personal cause since you clearly indicate in your above post that you have a keen understanding of the moral hazards that exist with rushing multi-subject bills through the legislative process.
WIth Great Appreciation In Advance For Your Dedicated Attention to This Matter,
Robert E. Lehman
Yorktown, VA
Leave your response