Will raising Virginia’s gas tax solve anything?PoliticsVirginia

As much as the Virginia press corps would prefer that the General Assembly finds itself tangled in a another net of social issues in the 2013 session, the worthies are more likely to find themselves snared in a battle over the gas tax.

To the delight of some, Sen. John Watkins has proposed slapping a five percent tax on gas at the wholesale level. This could raise pump prices around 14 cents per gallon. That’s sure to sting. But anticipating the sticker shock, the Watkins plan would also…

• lower income tax rates in the three lowest state tax brackets to offset most of the fuel assessment’s effect on working Virginians;

• eliminate various transportation-related tax credits and sales tax exemptions to fill the revenue gap created by cutting income tax rates;

• impose a $102 annual assessment on electric and hybrid vehicles; and

• prohibit tolls on existing highways unless they are approved by the General Assembly

Watkins believes this mass of moving parts will raise over $700 million per year for roads (with those pesky out of state drivers paying up to a third of the total), while the tax cuts would return over $500 million to lower income Virginians.

While one can debate Watkins’ projections, and whether the other portions of state government (and their defenders) that will take a hit from lower income tax receipts will play along, there is a fundamental question lying at the heart of this approach which few seem to have asked: will this approach make a bit of difference?

The inestimable Jim Bacon says “no.”

Watkins’ plan, like all the others made public so far, would perpetuate the system in which transportation projects are determined by rent-seeking, political log rolling and ideology, not demonstrated need. Indeed, by creating a new source of revenue and superficially “solving” the problem, the proposal would ensure that nothing changes.

To find out what else the plan can’t, doesn’t or won’t do, go read the rest of Jim’s piece at Bacon’s Rebellion.

  • http://www.facebook.com/alton.foley Alton Foley

    Not to mention that state and federal government already “earns” more profit from a gallon of gas than your local convenience store or the “greedy” oil companies.

    • MD Russ

      That is beside the point, Alton. The Federal and Virginia government also “earn” more profit from every dollar of my income that I spend at the supermarket than Giant does. That “profit” goes to fund things that benefit me such as national security, our Federal government (such as the FDA, etc), and state parks. How much of the profit from convenience stores and oil companies comes back to me in benefits? Zilch, unless I own stock in the company.

      Look, I want lower taxes just like the next guy. But I am willing to pay reasonable taxes to have public safety, good roads, and competent public education. The alternative is anarchy.

  • http://www.facebook.com/michaelj.barrett.355 Michael J Barrett

    So Norm, you solution is to do nothing? To fail once again to identify a sustainable source of financing for transportation infrastructure, and your plan is to simply ignore the problem, once again? There is no perfect system to allocate scare resources, and of course, now that republicans have led the way in destroying a system of transportation that once worked quite well, no matter how they were to allocate resources, it would do some good.

  • John Harvie

    Those of us in SE Virginia are facing multiple new tolls because of the tax situation while the rest of the commonwealth gets a “free” ride. The gas tax at whatever level seems to ensure a relatively more equitable revenue source based on vehicle usage and size irrespective of geography.

  • Pingback: Developing: A "conservative alternative transportation plan" | Bearing Drift