School choice bills advance, but in the Senate, the bloody shirt is waiting
By Norman Leahy | Saturday, February 11th, 2012 | Policy, Politics, VirginiaAn education tax credit bill patroned by Del. Jimmie Massie is beginning its march through the House, having cleared both a Finance subcommittee and the full committee by a 15-7 vote. The bill’s aims are rather modest, as it would create “scholarships to students who would have been eligible for the free and reduced lunch program under federal law,” and the pool of credits would be capped at $25 million.
These limits are all the reason some need to call for the bill’s demise — another case of making the perfect the blood enemy of the good.
Purist posturing aside, the real threat to any and all varieties of these choice bills has been the Virginia Senate, and specifically, the Senate Finance committee. When Democrat Chuck Colgan wielded the the chairman’s gavel (always under the watchful eye of then-majority leader Dick Saslaw), education choice legislation was guaranteed to fail. The only real question was how much theater some Democratic committee members would add to the puppet show.
That the Senate and its Finance committee are now under Republican control does not mean that brighter days are ahead for school choice. My sources indicate that some Republican mandarins are demanding further dilutions of the bills — otherwise they just won’t be able to support them.
For years, Republicans have mouthed their support for education reform. But they’ve generally recoiled at sweeping reforms, preferring instead to nibble at the edges. There are good political reasons for this, as Democrats will fight to the last child, alongside the VEA and other groups, in defense of the status quo.
And they fight dirty. Democrats raise the specter of Massive Resistance whenever the words “school choice” pass a Republican’s lips. Or, as seen in the clip below of Sen. Yvonne Miller, educational choice is just code for slavery:
These are the kinds of arguments that would make zealots blush. But they have been effective — so effective in the Senate, at least, that Republicans who might otherwise be willing to take bold steps on school choice are cowed by the thought of it.
In the days ahead, we shall see whether even a mild and limited choice bills can earn sufficient Republican support to get through the Senate Finance committee and on to the floor. If the bills succeed, then there’s hope that the ragged rage Sen. Miller gave voice to is losing its punch. If the bills fail, then we will know that the bloody shirt still has the power to terrify even the most secure of Republican incumbents.
Tags:
About the author
Norm Leahy has written about Virginia and national politics online since 2002, beginning with One Man's Trash (OMT), and continuing through Bacon's Rebellion (both the blog and the e-zine), Sic Semper Tyrannis, NBC12's Decision Virginia, Richmond.com and Tertium Quids. He is the chief blogger at "The Score" and a producer of "The Score" radio show as well as being a Washington Post contributor.







Comments
2 Responses to "School choice bills advance, but in the Senate, the bloody shirt is waiting"
Sen. Miller rants on and on about the bill’s similarity to slavery. She says it 3 or 4 different ways. But then she goes on to say (1:55 thru 2:10) that if we fully funded public education, then the bill “would be a viable option.” One can only conclude that she means it would be OK to sell our children into slavery as long as the prerequisite of paying her friends in the public school system is met.
This bill will pass the House with ~65 votes. I agree it may have a tough time in the Senate Finance Committee and an even tougher time on the Senate floor. Senate Finance has 9 R’s and 6 D’s. 4 of 9 R’s have voted for this bill in previous sessions. There are 5 new R’s on this committee (Newman, Ruff, Wagner, McDougle, Vogel). 4 of these 5 must vote for the bill in order to be reported out of Finance. The only possible no vote among these 5 is Newman. So the bill clears Senate Finance. Once it gets to the Senate floor, I think it will need 1 or 2 democrats in order to pass. Perhaps Barker, Herring and/or Northam.
This bill, more than any other, will reveal how much control each caucus chair has over their respective caucuses.
Leave your response
The comments section is for meaningful discussion. Readers are reminded to post comments that are germane to the article and write in a common language that steers clear of personal attacks and/or vulgarities.
Please take a moment to review our comment policy.