Will Governor McDonnell put VDOT on an eminent-domain leash?
By Rick Sincere | Tuesday, January 10th, 2012 | VirginiaWith about 75 members of the GOP House and Senate caucuses behind him and standing side-by-side with Lieutenant Governor Bill Bolling, Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli, Speaker of the House of Delegates Bill Howell, and presumptive Senate Majority Leader Tommy Norment, Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell announced the Republican party’s legislative priorities for the 2012 session of the General Assembly on Tuesday, January 10.
The patient crowd of legislators stood staring into the sun for about 25 minutes on the south portico of the state Capitol, forming a photogenic backdrop for the members of the leadership who took center stage.
In addition to offering his own remarks, McDonnell acted as emcee for the occasion, introducing each of his colleagues in turn, with Bolling talking about job creation, Cuccinelli addressing constitutional matters (primarily an amendment to enshrine property rights protections in the Virginia Constitution), Howell discussing government reform efforts, and Norment focusing on budgetary matters.
(See the event video on YouTube.)
After the formal presentation, McDonnell answered a few questions from the press.
In a crowded gaggle and wedged between Anita Kumar of the Washington Post on one side and Derick Waller of Charlottesville’s NBC29 on the other, I had just one opportunity to ask a question.
Knowing that in past years, the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) had tried to hobble attempts to protect private property rights against the abuse of eminent domain by local and state governments, I wanted to find out whether the governor would rein in VDOT this year as the constitutional amendment faces its second vote and as clarifying legislation has to pass for the first time.
Here is our exchange:
Governor, on the property rights amendment and accompanying legislation, are you going to ask VDOT and other government agencies to stand aside and not raise objections to it?
Governor McDonnell: I haven’t discussed that with VDOT. I’m supportive of it. I think this is the final fix to the horrendous 2005 Kelo v. City of New London decision, [and the amendment] protects property rights in the Virginia constitution.
What I haven’t seen, though, is what is the legislation that might be put in that furthers the rights that will be embodied in the Constitution, so there may be some things in the legislation that would create some concerns for VDOT — but I haven’t seen all those bills yet.
The accompanying legislation would include provisions to compensate property owners for loss of access and loss of profits if their farms or businesses are disabled by eminent domain proceedings.
This issue will be one of the key matters to be taken up by the General Assembly this year, and despite stubborn opposition, it is likely, as Bearing Drift has predicted, to pass both chambers and then be approved overwhelmingly by the voters in November.
We should also expect that the Governor will bring up many of these same issues during his State of the Commonwealth address on Wednesday evening.
Tags:
About the author
Rick Sincere, twice a candidate for the Virginia House of Delegates, blogs about politics and culture from Charlottesville. He is the author of two books on U.S. policy toward Africa and has contributed articles to the Richmond Times-Dispatch, Wall Street Journal, and Washington Examiner, among other publications. Follow him on Twitter at @rick_sincere.







Comments
2 Responses to "Will Governor McDonnell put VDOT on an eminent-domain leash?"
Of course I am sure the reporter had her tounge firmly implanted in her cheek. The Governor, having been part of the republican led dismantling of a once efficient transportation system, must have felt that when he was elected, Howell and his caucus would have relented and supported what everyone and his Mom knows is required; that is, an increase in user fees to support transportation, but of course, the Governor did not receive that support.
It will be left to others to deal with this mess, and the legacy of McDonnell, Howell, and their intrasigent republican caucus, will forever be the destruction of our transportation infrastructure. This failure of governance will transcend any other action this administration and this legislature took or failed to take.
This amendment is just another in a long line of anti public interest actions this Legislature has taken and will take this session. The damage to Virginia of this amendment will not be easily overturned, but frankly, they could care less.
Barrett has seen too many VDOT press releases and has little first hand knowledge of how they operate. VDOT cares little about waste. Less than 25 years after building the I-77 bridge over the New River, they had to tear it down and rebuild it, due to incompetent workmanship and design. The new design causes even more accidents. Whereas, the Romans with much more primitive engineering techniques at their disposal built bridges that stand even today. VDOT has an unlimited budget for legal expenses and expert witnesses, and they frequently spend far more to defend their predatory land acquisition practices than it would have cost to pay a fair price in the first place.
VDOT has developed a great deal of anger toward the people in the path of their projects because the people of Virginia act as if they hold inherent rights under law, while VDOT makes it clear that they believe that they do not act under law but rather their actions in and of themselves constitute law.
At least one Court, the Wythe County Circuit Court sided with me. Because last year I won a major and rare reverse condemnation suit against VDOT. The average small landowner lacks either the resources or the availibility of the expertise to stand a chance against VDOT.
Edd B. Jennings
Leave your response
The comments section is for meaningful discussion. Readers are reminded to post comments that are germane to the article and write in a common language that steers clear of personal attacks and/or vulgarities.
Please take a moment to review our comment policy.