Calling a tax a tax
By Norman Leahy | Wednesday, December 28th, 2011 | Politics, VirginiaDuring the legislative dickering over the state budget in 2010, Del. Bob Marshall, alone among his colleagues, questioned the practice of embedded fee and other tax hikes directly into the budget language, as opposed to subjecting each proposed hike to debate and a vote. His questions and concerns were met with stony silence, and as a result, the budget that contained no tax increases managed to pass. But please, pay no attention to the fee increases, higher liquor prices (plus more ABC stores) and other sleights of hand used to balance the books.
It’s obvious from this bill that the whole experience still rankles Marshall. He proposes that rather than using words like fee or toll, that lawmakers instead be required to use the simpler, more blunt, word, “tax.” His bill carves out several generous exemptions to the label, so there’s little worry that the entrance fee you pay to a state park will be called a tax, or that your hunting license fee will now be a hunting tax. Specific benefits provided to specific users don’t fall under Marshall’s proposed bill.
Would it change much? Not likely. The larger question of embedding hikes directly in the budget bill goes unaddressed here. But a smaller purpose might be achieved: removing the temptation for doublespeak.
Tags:
About the author
Norm Leahy has written about Virginia and national politics online since 2002, beginning with One Man's Trash (OMT), and continuing through Bacon's Rebellion (both the blog and the e-zine), Sic Semper Tyrannis, NBC12's Decision Virginia, Richmond.com and Tertium Quids. He is the chief blogger at "The Score" and a producer of "The Score" radio show as well as being a Washington Post contributor.







Comments
One Response to "Calling a tax a tax"
Hmmm, how would this affect specific programs that are funded by fees? We have what’s called the “Callahan Act” that provides that non-general fund agencies that are self supporting through fees…board of contractors, many professional boards, etc. …. MUST charge high enough fees to cover the cost of the administering the programs. If would make sense that those fees are in the budget, since the General Assembly has little discretion there. I’d agree that broad-based taxes, and certainly tolls, should be put to a seperate vote.
Leave your response
The comments section is for meaningful discussion. Readers are reminded to post comments that are germane to the article and write in a common language that steers clear of personal attacks and/or vulgarities.
Please take a moment to review our comment policy.