Poll: uranium mining favored narrowly, but corporate welfare is a huge hit
By | Thursday, December 22nd, 2011 | Catch-All

Quinnipiac didn’t poll Virginians on the presidential sweepstakes alone. The University’s polling unit also asked questions about issues ranging from conception to gun control to uranium mining. and it’s on the latter issues that some interesting data emerge:

…43 percent say mining should be allowed because of economic benefits while 41 percent are opposed because of environmental concerns…

That’s a two point shift in the pro-mining direction since the question was last asked at the end of June. Inside the headline number we see:

“There is a large gender gap on the issue of removing the uranium ban,” said Peter Brown, assistant director of the Quinnipiac University Polling Institute. “Men want to lift it 53 – 33 percent while women want to keep the restriction 47 – 34 percent. Education also seems to affect attitude, with college graduates opposed to mining 47 – 40 percent, while those without a degree in favor of mining 45 – 37 percent.”

Support for uranium mining is 62 – 24 percent among Republicans while independent voters split 42 – 43 percent. Democrats oppose mining 54 – 29 percent.

Read into those numbers what you will. One thing is somewhat clear, though: Republicans who either sit on the fence or oppose mining had best be careful.

And in light of the news today that Amazon will be building distribution centers in Chesterfield and Dinwiddie counties, with a generous dollop of state, regional and local aid (though none dare call it corporate welfare), the Quinnipiac survey asked this question:

The state of Virginia has sought to convince businesses to move to the commonwealth by offering them tax credits or subsidies. Do you think this is a good idea or a bad idea?

By a 62-25 margin, the Virginians polled said it was a good idea. More disturbingly for those of us who cling (fruitlessly, it seems) to the idea that free markets and not government check writers ought to determine where businesses locate, a whopping 76 percent of Republicans agree with the idea, as did 67 percent of independents and 54 percent of Democrats. Those with college degrees really like it (71 percent). Those with household incomes over $100,000 like it, too (70 percent).

To judge by these results, then, state capitalism has carried the day. And that’s damned depressing.


Tags:

Contribute for Conservatism!

Share this post

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed
  • Share this post on Delicious
  • StumbleUpon this post
  • Share this post on Digg
  • Tweet about this post
  • Share this post on Mixx
  • Share this post on Technorati
  • Share this post on Facebook
  • Share this post on NewsVine
  • Share this post on Reddit
  • Share this post on Google
  • Share this post on LinkedIn

About the author

Norman Leahy

Norm Leahy has written about Virginia and national politics online since 2002, beginning with One Man's Trash (OMT), and continuing through Bacon's Rebellion (both the blog and the e-zine), Sic Semper Tyrannis, NBC12's Decision Virginia, Richmond.com and Tertium Quids. He is the chief blogger at "The Score" and a producer of "The Score" radio show as well as being a Washington Post contributor.

Comments

One Response to "Poll: uranium mining favored narrowly, but corporate welfare is a huge hit"
  1. Jamie Jacoby December 22, 2011 17:49 pm

    The government musn’t (spell-checker doesn’t like “musn’t”) be in the business of picking winners, because in so doing it also picks losers: those everyday schlubs who must slave away and earn a living without government support or breaks.

    As for the mining moratorium, I have said “Virginia must reinvigorate her love affair with her farmers, miners and manufacturers.” The proposed project is exactly what we want. Questions of downstream impacts are technical and can be and must be monitored by the state in her role as protector of private property. The state’s role is NOT to decide what kind of businesses it will “allow”; it is to protect liberty and private property.

    Yes, I’m libertarian, and science-based (not “cronyism legislated-market-share-based” or “globalist free-market-destroying-based”) environmental regulation is one of the few types of regulation I actually favor. We want to avoid both “the tragedy of the commons” as well as “the free-rider problem.”

    With Uranium mining, I’m confident the detection technology is far more sensitive than the levels of contamination at which harm is caused.

Leave your response

The comments section is for meaningful discussion. Readers are reminded to post comments that are germane to the article and write in a common language that steers clear of personal attacks and/or vulgarities.

Please take a moment to review our comment policy.