Egypt’s election: how the non-democrats collaborated to freeze the democrats out
By D.J. McGuire | Tuesday, December 6th, 2011 | InternationalThe first phase of Egypt’s parliamentary election is in the books and outside observers are facing the reality of an Islamist majority in parliament. What is not as well known is how it happened.
Elections in Muslim-majority nations are replete with tales of autocrats rigging the vote, largely to the advantage of “opposition” Islamists and to the detriment of genuine democrats. Pervez Musharraf did it repeatedly in Pakistan, which I mention because it was the one example Daniel Pipes and Cynthia Farahat neglected to mention in their otherwise excellent review of the subject (National Review Online, emphasis added):
Other Middle Eastern dictators, such as the Yemeni president and Palestinian Authority chairman, also play this double game, pretending to be anti-Islamist moderates and Western allies while, in fact, being toughs who cooperate with Islamists and repress true moderates. Even anti-Western tyrants like Assad of Syria and Qaddafi of Libya have played the same opportunistic game in times of need, portraying massive uprisings against them as Islamist movements. (Recall how Qaddafi blamed the Libyan insurrection on al-Qaeda’s lacing teenagers’ coffee with hallucinatory pills.)
But did this happen in Egypt? Yup.
Today, (Egyptian military chief Mohamad) Tantawi and his Supreme Council of the Armed Forces (SCAF) still play this tired old game. Note the various methods:
Reports of electoral fraud have emerged, for example in Helwan.
SCAF has, according to the prominent Islamist Safwat Hijazi, offered a “deal” to the Islamists that it would share power with them on condition that they turn a blind eye to its corruption.
The military has subsidized both the Muslim Brotherhood and Salafi political parties during the recent parliamentary elections. Marc Ginsburg reports on a SCAF slush fund totaling millions of dollars in “the form of ‘walk around’ money, clothing and food giveaways” that enabled hundreds of local chapters of Islamist political organizations to buy votes. Ginsburg tells of a SCAF emissary who “met secretly with representatives of the Muslim Brotherhood and other Islamist oriented political movements last April to establish local political ‘action committee’ bank accounts to funnel an underground supply chain of financial and commodity support.”
So once again, the fellows who were the target of the popular uprising split the opposition – and made a deal with the Islamist fellows to freeze out the actual democrats.
At some point, the Egyptian military will pick a fight with their new allies and use it to pretend to America that it is our only friend in Egypt. We should pay no attention (let alone aid) to them, and make clear we will do what we can to help the Egyptian democrats. That will be easier than may think now that the MB and Nour become de facto partners in the corrupt kleptocracy that went right on running Egypt into the ground after Mubarak left.
Cross-posted to the right-wing liberal
Tags:
About the author
Former candidate for Board of Supervisors in Spotsylvania, current blogger, economics teacher, and long-rumored windbag. There are two causes closest to the heart: steering the country away from the social democratic nonsense that is sinking Europe, and convincing the rest of the "rightosphere" that the NBA really is a joy to watch.





Reports of electoral fraud have 



We're 75% there! Thank you to everyone who has so far contributed! Just $2000 to go!
Comments
5 Responses to "Egypt’s election: how the non-democrats collaborated to freeze the democrats out"
[...] to Bearing Drift GA_googleAddAttr("AdOpt", "1"); GA_googleAddAttr("Origin", "other"); [...]
“the Egyptian military will pick a fight with their new allies and use it to pretend to America that it is our only friend in Egypt. We should pay no attention (let alone aid) to them, and make clear we will do what we can to help the Egyptian democrats. That will be easier than many think now that the MB and Nour become de facto partners in the corrupt kleptocracy that went right on running Egypt into the ground after Mubarak left.”
Not likely. I think the Brotherhood and Nour will find a way to distance themselves from culpability. After all they control the flow of information in the streets and small towns and have historically been oppressed by the military. If they were to purge the military the way the Ayatollahs did in Iran then they might be tied to them. With the military pretty much all Mubarak hires the Islamists are in great shape to point fingers and increase their standing as the only group tough enough to deal with them.
As for helping the moderates that would require a change of administration here since Obama and the Dems prefer the Islamists.
Or we could just stay out of it entirely and stop givving them money. We are told all kinds of bad things will happen if we are not intruding on other nations’ sovereignty, but why not try it out some and see what happens. Can’t be any worse.
The idea of keeping Americans and American money here sounds good to me.
Afterall Egyptian civilization is thousands of years old. These power struggles have been going on since before Moses was chasing goats in the desert and talking to Burning Bushes.
Maybe this time they will end up with an Egyptian Taliban. Then what do we do?
Leave your response