Debt, defense and downgrades
By | Monday, November 28th, 2011 | Economics, Policy, Politics, Virginia

Lurking in the background of the supercommittee’s failure to find budget savings is how, if at all, the credit ratings agencies would react.

So far, Fitch, Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s are biding their time. Moody’s and Fitch may move to a negative outlook on U.S. debt, while S&P, which famously took the nation’s debt down a notch over the summer, isn’t contemplating a further downgrade.

All of this has particular meaning for Virginia, which, like other AAA-rated states, was warned that its debt rating would suffer if the federal government either lost its own AAA rating or defaulted.

This possibility, which would raise Virginia’s debt service payments and thus squeeze-out other budget items, appears to be off the table. For now.

But don’t get cocky. The supercommittee’s punt will result in a sequester (in 2013). While the proposed cuts will be spread out over a decade, and barely dent the overall rise in federal spending during the same period, half of the proposed savings come from defense spending. And that’s Virginia’s Achilles heel.

Or so the thinking goes. Finance Secretary Ric Brown is worried about those looming cuts, but believes the real pain won’t come for several years:

Defense cuts would not necessarily hurt Virginia, at least not in the short term, he said. If cuts lead to consolidation of military installations, the state could wind up gaining jobs, as it did under the Base Realignment and Closure process, Brown said. And some military contracts, such as ship-building for the Navy, are unlikely to be broken, he said.

“You have to get out to 2018 before you start to feel the pinch on that [ship-building],” he said.

But steep cuts are likely to hurt the state eventually, and perhaps dramatically, he said.

“Sooner or later, it catches up with us,” he said. “It’s not so much immediately. It’s the longer term. … There are going to be cutbacks and that will affect Virginia in the longer haul because the federal government is a big part of our economy.”

Read another way: the next administration will have to handle the fallout — assuming the federal spending cuts actually occur.

But the larger point is that Virginia has enjoyed a boom in defense spending over the last decade. Those days appear to be over. Before the party comes to a screeching halt, though, Virginia has an opportunity to accelerate its diversification away from federal spending and toward the private sector (such as in energy exploration and development…if such activities are allowed).

Failure to make this move will result in larger and more protracted budgetary woes in the future — and put fresh, new pressures on the state’s AAA rating.


Tags:

Contribute for Conservatism!

Share this post

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed
  • Share this post on Delicious
  • StumbleUpon this post
  • Share this post on Digg
  • Tweet about this post
  • Share this post on Mixx
  • Share this post on Technorati
  • Share this post on Facebook
  • Share this post on NewsVine
  • Share this post on Reddit
  • Share this post on Google
  • Share this post on LinkedIn

About the author

Norman Leahy

Norm Leahy has written about Virginia and national politics online since 2002, beginning with One Man's Trash (OMT), and continuing through Bacon's Rebellion (both the blog and the e-zine), Sic Semper Tyrannis, NBC12's Decision Virginia, Richmond.com and Tertium Quids. He is the chief blogger at "The Score" and a producer of "The Score" radio show as well as being a Washington Post contributor.

Comments

2 Responses to "Debt, defense and downgrades"
  1. ToR November 28, 2011 17:28 pm

    Glad to see someone on this blog is willing to admit to our over-dependence on the Federal Government for jobs and revenue. However, I’d guess we’re going to be hit a lot harder than you realize. The numbers of Virginians who depend on DC is astronomical.

    Energy exploration and development will happen when private sector is interested in exploring. The ban is irrelevant; when they want to drill they’ll be able to drill. The reality is that there aren’t any companies lining up and they won’t do so until they receive subsidies or some sort of financial support from the state or Feds, it’s too big a financial risk otherwise.

    I do propose that we create a wealth fund (like many resource rich states and nations) with the revenues. It’s seemed to work very well for them and could do so for us. We should have been doing this with coal and our other resources up to this point.

  2. Business and Financial Capital Source « Debt Relief Consolidation November 29, 2011 18:10 pm

    [...] Norm Leahy has written about Virginia and national politics online since 2002, beginning with One Man’s Trash (OMT), and continuing through Bacon’s Rebellion (both the blog and the e-zine), Sic Semper Tyrannis, NBC12′s Decision Virginia, Richmond.com and Tertium Quids. He is the chief blogger at “The Score” and a producer of “The Score” radio show as well as being a Washington Examiner contributor.Source: bearingdrift.com [...]

Leave your response

The comments section is for meaningful discussion. Readers are reminded to post comments that are germane to the article and write in a common language that steers clear of personal attacks and/or vulgarities.

Please take a moment to review our comment policy.