Supreme Court grants cert. in Obamacare case
By Norman Leahy | Monday, November 14th, 2011 | Policy, VirginiaThe U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear the 26 state-challenge to the federal health care law (or Obamacare, for those playing at home) in March, 2012. The Virginia lawsuit against the law was not included in the hearing.
But this isn’t your ordinary Supreme Court hearing. According to the Scotusblog, the Court has scheduled five and a half hours of argument, which “…appeared to be a modern record.”
The Court will consider the following matters (again via the Scotusblog):
* Granted, the issue of “severability” of the insurance mandate from the other provisions of the law, if the mandate is nullified (the only question in National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius [docket 11-393] and question 3 in Florida, et al., v. Department of Health & Human Services [11-400]), cases consolidated for 90 minutes of oral argument.
* Granted, the constitutionality of the insurance mandate (question 1 in the government case, Department of Health & Human Services v. Florida, et al.), two hours of oral argument.
* Parties directed to brief and argue whether the lawsuit brought by the states challenging the insurance mandate is barred by the Anti-Injunction Act (an added question in the government case, 11-398), one hour of oral argument. (That order appeared to be limited to reviewing whether that Act only bars states from challenging the mandate; the question of whether that Act bars private entities from challenging the mandate was raised in the Liberty University case, and the Court did not grant that petition.) (UPDATE: It appears, on a closer reading of the grants, that the Anti-Injunction Act will be explored as a limitation on challenges to the mandate by either private individuals or states.)
* Granted, the constitutionality of the Medicaid expansion (question 1 in the Florida, et al., v. Department of Health and Human Services case, 11-400); one hour of oral argument.
I leave it to those who paid handsomely for law degrees to tell us whether this covers all the relevant bases.
Tags:
About the author
Norm Leahy has written about Virginia and national politics online since 2002, beginning with One Man's Trash (OMT), and continuing through Bacon's Rebellion (both the blog and the e-zine), Sic Semper Tyrannis, NBC12's Decision Virginia, Richmond.com and Tertium Quids. He is the chief blogger at "The Score" and a producer of "The Score" radio show as well as being a Washington Examiner contributor.









We're 75% there! Thank you to everyone who has so far contributed! Just $2000 to go!
Comments
4 Responses to "Supreme Court grants cert. in Obamacare case"
This is going to be bigger than Roe v. Wade, and just like that case I predict that the Court is going to surprise everyone with the reasoning of their decision. The decision will be handed down just before the 2012 conventions and the run-up to the General Election. Let the games begin!
Can I be the first one to predict that they will uphold ObamaCare and the individual mandate? Not that I want them to, but I’ve got a suspicion that is where they are going to go. And, it won’t be based on the Commerce Clause.
It’s interesting that they didn’t grant or deny cert to the Virginia case. I understand that they may bring it up at the November 22 orders day, but it’s interesting that they didn’t bring it up specifically here.
Perhaps because our case was overturned based on different standing issue it wasn’t included here. I hope the AG does a press release with his comment on the cert grants, as I’d be interested in seeing his response.
This isn’t about whether the health care law is constitutional or not, obviously the individual mandate isn’t. Now this about the Supreme Court itself, about whether the people can depend on the court to uphold the Constitution and deliver Justice.
All eyes are on Justice Kagan… will she or won’t she?
Leave your response