Is John Edwards the Creigh Deeds of 2011?
By Jason Johnson | Sunday, October 23rd, 2011 | PoliticsIn the 2009 gubernatorial election, Sen. Creigh Deeds made no attempt to hide his desire to raise to taxes if elected. This afforded the Republican Party of Virginia ample fodder for humor ads. The Virginia electorate, however, found Sen. Deeds’ fixation with tax increases less humorous as he was crushed in the general election by the tax-cutting Bob McDonnell. The 21st Senate District might have its own version of Creigh Deeds in the person of Sen. John Edwards.
As the distinguished Sen. Mark Obenshain writes in the most recent issue of Bearing Drift magazine, Sen. John Edwards “pushes a gas tax increase year after year.” Like Creigh Deeds, Sen. Edwards sees no reason to hide his record from the voting public.
In an interview with the Roanoke Free Press, Sen. Edwards accused Gov. McDonnell of attempting to fix the Commonwealth’s transportation system with federal “bandaids” and “smoke and mirrors” audits and bonds. What is really needed, he insists, is one billion dollars per year in new revenue and argues that the best way to raise that revenue is to increase the gas tax.
A gas tax is a user fee and out-of-state drivers pay 36 percent of that. “They should have the privilege of helping maintain our roads,” he [Sen. John Edwards] said. A gas tax is the best way to build and maintain roads thought Edwards. Tolls do not provide enough revenue and are expensive to operate.
Furthermore, he argues, business people love the idea of higher gas taxes! Do you know of a business-owner (Warren Buffett, excluded) who wants to pay higher taxes–especially in this economy? Granted, the average price of gas in Virginia is down from its high earlier this year (as of this writing, the average price for a gallon of gas in Roanoke–the largest city in Edwards’ 21st Senate District–is approximately $3.14). Virginia families are, no doubt, glad to see that gas is cheaper as the holiday traveling season approaches, but I highly doubt anyone thinks the prices are yet low enough to merit an increase in the amount we send to Richmond, or Washington, for that matter, every time we fill up.
Sens. Deeds and Edwards might disagree with the way Gov. McDonnell has decided to finance upgrades to Virginia’s highway infrastructure, but at least he isn’t falling for the same old liberal line that tax increases are the answer to every problem that arises. In this sluggish economy, as Virginia’s families are trying to make their hard-earned dollars go farther, we’re glad he isn’t, too.
Tags:
About the author
A lifelong political junkie, Jason caught the political bug as a fifth grader after meeting George Allen in 1993. Since then he has studied political science at both the undergraduate and graduate level. When not perusing the blogs or volunteering for conservative Republicans, Jason enjoys cheering on his beloved Virginia Tech Hokies and spending time at his Bedford County home.







Comments
One Response to "Is John Edwards the Creigh Deeds of 2011?"
1) I told my wife that if we financed our new Mercedes it wouldn’t cost us anything. She didn’t buy it. Similarly, state borrowing has to be paid back eventually so I don’t get why people are so giddy about a $1b in bonds for transportation.
2) Federal funds for state transportation projects are not, in any way, a Conservative solution to Virginia’s transportation problems. We should stand on principle regardless of whether Virginia gets the largess or not.
3) If the money is going to be spent, a user fee is the most conservative way to pay for transportation projects. A toll is the best user fee, but a gas tax isn’t a bad approximation for a user fee.
4) Spending general fund revenue for transportation is the worst way to pay for transportation. It takes money out of everyone’s pockets and puts it in the pockets of people who disproportionately use transportation. If there is a general revenue surplus, it should be given back to the people and transportation funded from another source.
Leave your response
The comments section is for meaningful discussion. Readers are reminded to post comments that are germane to the article and write in a common language that steers clear of personal attacks and/or vulgarities.
Please take a moment to review our comment policy.