Giving Grover the boot
By | Sunday, October 9th, 2011 | Politics, Virginia

Shaun has already written about Rep. Frank Wolf’s public outburst aimed at Grover Norquist. For those of who’ve followed Grover’s machinations, Wolf’s comments weren’t all that different from what conservatives have been saying privately about the Americans for Tax Reform president for many years. The only real difference was that Wolf worked clean. Grover’s detractors work blue…deep blue. But for all their rage and choice Anlgo-Saxon nouns, that they have yet to find an alternative to Norquist, or even his weekly meetings, speaks more about their impotence than much else.

It’s very much an inside baseball spat (though for the curious, you can get a good, gossipy dose of it all here). Nevertheless, even this most beltway-centric of blow-ups is enough for the RTD’s Jeff Schapiro jumps in with his own take on why Uncle Frank decided to take Grover to the congressional record woodshed. The results are much like those one would expect of a group of blind men describing an elephant.

Jeff believes Wolf is trying to create some sort of electoral cushion for himself, being that the boundaries of Wolf’s district aren’t set. Wolf also took off-mic swings at Democrats, to ensure, Jeff says, that Republicans pinned to Grover’s sleeve won’t be too upset with his remarks.

If you want to believe that Norquist has a kind of Svengali-like hold over Virginia Republicans, you’re free to do so. I suggest, though, that it gives Norquist far too much credit for what he and his group do. And whatever influence Grover may hold with the elected doesn’t reach down to the voters. Case in point: Grover’s thundering in 2004 that he would take out the Republicans who signed on to then-Gov. Mark Warner’s tax hike. The infamous “Least Wanted” poster promised retribution at the polls. But when it came time to actually take out those apostates, ATR ran a half-hearted campaign that was limited to having a few of the posters placed in Metrorail cars.

The “least wanted” did quite well for themselves in the 2005 elections. And some have since thrived.

But let’s talk about the one person Jeff doesn’t mention in his column who turned his back on the no tax pledge: Gov. Bob McDonnell. As a candidate, McDonnell refused to sign the ATR pledge, even though he had done so as a Delegate. This refusal did little if anything to hold McDonnell back in the 2009 gubernatorial race and now the Governor is considered prime vice presidential material.

So those who do turn Grover’s pledge down — for whatever reason — generally tend to do okay in Virginia. It’s not because the pledge isn’t important to some — it is. Rather, the pledge, Norquist and the rest just don’t register with the average voter. They have other, bigger, concerns on their minds.

And really — what is the pledge worth? Russ Potts signed the pledge, yet managed to survive in the state Senate, and even make a spiteful run for governor in 2005. Heck, even Democrat Roscoe Reynolds signed Grover’s oath.

Is a pledge with such signers worth the paper and ink it consumes? Not really. Nor does Grover deserve to continue to live, rent free, in the heads of conservatives and Republicans. The sooner they give him the boot, the better off they will be.


Tags:

Contribute for Conservatism!

Share this post

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed
  • Share this post on Delicious
  • StumbleUpon this post
  • Share this post on Digg
  • Tweet about this post
  • Share this post on Mixx
  • Share this post on Technorati
  • Share this post on Facebook
  • Share this post on NewsVine
  • Share this post on Reddit
  • Share this post on Google
  • Share this post on LinkedIn

About the author

Norman Leahy

Norm Leahy has written about Virginia and national politics online since 2002, beginning with One Man's Trash (OMT), and continuing through Bacon's Rebellion (both the blog and the e-zine), Sic Semper Tyrannis, NBC12's Decision Virginia, Richmond.com and Tertium Quids. He is the chief blogger at "The Score" and a producer of "The Score" radio show as well as being a Washington Examiner contributor.

Comments

4 Responses to "Giving Grover the boot"
  1. Mike Barrett October 9, 2011 13:04 pm

    Yes, give him the boot, and while we are at it, defeat any candidate for office who puts a pledge to Norquist ahead of the interests of their constituents. Every politician who has signed that pledge, in my humble view, violated his/her oath of office to serve in the public interest. No one can know in advance of serving what our nation, our Commonwealth, or our city will face. Throw out any bum who has the audacity to put Norquist’s pledge above the voter.

  2. James "turbo" Cohen October 9, 2011 20:52 pm

    To his credit, Kenny Golden called out Norquist for the POS he is before any republican I know of.

  3. D.J. McGuire October 10, 2011 08:23 am

    With all due respect, Frank Wolf was not trying to purify the conservative movement, or defend the integrity of the Republican Party, or anything like that. He was trying to give himself cover for a tax increase.

    Now, he may genuinely think a tax increase is warranted, but those of us who disagree have every right to say so – and make sure that others who agree with us are fully aware of who doesn’t.

    Grover has his faults, but the idea that a tax increases come heaven-sent is really starting to annoy me (this is for Mike, not Norm).

    For those with a shorter memory than I: the GOP used to be the party of “responsible” tax increases and opposition to tax cuts. The legacy is as follows: the Great Depression (1932 tax increases); three Eisenhower recessions (1954, 1957, and 1960), and the Great Inflation (Nixon).

    Oh, and the party won 4 of 12 presidential elections (and two of them while running the Supreme Allied Commander in World War II) and 2 of 25 Congresional elections between 1930 and 1980.

    Let’s not go back to *that* future, OK?

  4. Mike Barrett October 10, 2011 10:28 am

    The point is what is responsible fiscal policy for the future. Every commission has said we must get our fiscal house in order, reduce deficits, lower the debt, and that must be done through a combination of tax reform, increased revenue, cuts in expenditures, and reform of entitlements. Since Norquist has and will paint a target on any politician who goes along with anything except cuts, and since the republican study committee has adopted that at their policy, it is absolutely hypocritical for republicans to take about deficit reduction when they know that is impossible without compromise with the other side.

Leave your response

Please take a moment to review our comment policy.