John Taylor takes aim at Goldman-Sachs report
By | Monday, February 28th, 2011 | Policy

Last week, when Goldman-Sachs’ Alec Phillips released his inflated-multiplier report on the House Republicans’ budget, I noted the problems with his Old Keynesian assumptions.

I was gratified to see that today, Professor John Taylor – the man on whom I’ve relied most extensively in re the new findings on the multiplier – came to the same conclusion (and added some other ones that I confess I missed in my focus on the multiplier problem):

As I have written before, the old-style Keynesian approach used by Zandi has many of the same flaws that are found in the Goldman Sachs approach: excessively large multipliers, inaccurate predictions of the effect of the 2009 stimulus, failure to recognize that reducing uncertainty about the debt can have positive effects, especially if it is done in a credible way by reducing spending growth now, not postponing it to a date uncertain in the future.

Cross-posted to RWL


Tags:

Contribute for Conservatism!

Share this post

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed
  • Share this post on Delicious
  • StumbleUpon this post
  • Share this post on Digg
  • Tweet about this post
  • Share this post on Mixx
  • Share this post on Technorati
  • Share this post on Facebook
  • Share this post on NewsVine
  • Share this post on Reddit
  • Share this post on Google
  • Share this post on LinkedIn

About the author

D.J. McGuire

Former candidate for Board of Supervisors in Spotsylvania, current blogger, economics teacher, and long-rumored windbag. There are two causes closest to the heart: steering the country away from the social democratic nonsense that is sinking Europe, and convincing the rest of the "rightosphere" that the NBA really is a joy to watch.

Comments

One Response to "John Taylor takes aim at Goldman-Sachs report"
  1. HisRoc February 28, 2011 17:22 pm

    Why would anyone believe Mark Zandi, who confidently assured Obama that spending $787B would cap unemployment at 8% and create millions of new jobs? Now he want us to believe that letting the deficit rise will protect jobs? Hey, Mark. Go sit in the car and don’t play the radio.

Leave your response

Please take a moment to review our comment policy.