Virginia House and Senate reach budget deal
By | Sunday, February 27th, 2011 | Policy

Early Sunday morning, Virginia General Assembly budget negotiators broke their impasse and agreed on a deal. Preliminary indications are that House Republicans managed to prevail on the Senate many necessary amendments to the budget, keeping in mind the uncertain nature of the current recovery.

G. Paul Nardo, chief of staff to Speaker of the House William Howell writes that the budget deal includes:

  • No fees or higher taxes (Senate budget proposed fee increases, while House budget actually reduced fees by about $5 million);
  • No funding for non-state agencies (Senate budget proposed funding Foodbank and OpSail, among other NSAs, while House budget heeded the Attorney General’s opinion that such funding is unconstitutional and prohibited);
  • No funding for a new “Taj Mahal” to replace the General Assembly Building (Senate budget proposed $300 million for new/renovated seat of government buildings, while House budget had zero)
  • Additional $64 million deposit into the Rainy Day Fund (meaning a total of $114 million or half of the constitutionally required deposit in FY 2013);
  • Eliminating the Accelerated Sales Tax (AST) for 80% of retailers (Senate budget did nothing to help retailers and other business, while House budget eliminated this accounting gimmick for 98%);
  • $30 million for the Behavioral Trust Fund for Intellectually and Developmentally Disabled Virginians.

“In these still tight economic times with uncertainty clouding job prospects and business growth, Speaker Howell and the 60-member strong Republican Majority worked hard — and successfully — for budget amendments that are fiscally restrained… that put state finances in a much stronger and more structurally balanced position going forward… and that adhere to common-sense conservative principles of avoiding unnecessary government spending and higher taxes which kill jobs and hinder economic growth,” wrote Nardo. “And, by being fiscally responsible this year, House Republicans have helped put state finances in a much stronger position to avoid inevitable calls by tax-and-spend Democrats for higher taxes next year.”

Personally, I’m a little disappointed about NSA funding being scrapped, but if it means keeping the budget balanced, while funding other core government functions and prevents a tax increase, it’s the right thing to do.

More details on the budget deal and votes to follow later as an update to this post.

Update: A comprehensive list of the agreed to budget amendments that will be presented today prior to the vote late this afternoon.


Tags:

Contribute for Conservatism!

Share this post

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed
  • Share this post on Delicious
  • StumbleUpon this post
  • Share this post on Digg
  • Tweet about this post
  • Share this post on Mixx
  • Share this post on Technorati
  • Share this post on Facebook
  • Share this post on NewsVine
  • Share this post on Reddit
  • Share this post on Google
  • Share this post on LinkedIn

About the author

JR Hoeft

Conservative to the core; liberal with his opinion! J.R. has been involved in politics for over a decade and has worked on several campaigns in Hampton Roads. He has served on the Executive Committee of the Republican Party of Chesapeake and the Central Committee of the Republican Party of Virginia. He is also the director of “Blogs United” in Virginia. E-mail J.R.. Follow J.R. on Twitter.

Comments

4 Responses to "Virginia House and Senate reach budget deal"
  1. Shaun Kenney February 27, 2011 09:31 am

    Also included but not mentioned is a $75 million additional contribution to state education — a sigh of relief for localities (and part of the Senate budget).

    Still means that for itty-bitty Fluvanna, we get $220K in additional funding from the state, but were cut nearly $1.3 million. Which means the local taxpayer is being asked to pick up the tab….

    I love budget season!

  2. Craig Orndorff February 27, 2011 19:55 pm

    There seems to be a growing agreement that the vast majority of NSAs are unconstitutional, particularly in light of the AG’s opinion. I realize that the final word wouldn’t be until this goes to court, but to me, that’s enough to stop the process. So why the disappointment?

  3. Steve Vaughan February 28, 2011 09:29 am

    I’m surprised that Nardo didn’t mention that the House prevailed on one of the bigger issues of the session, employee contributions to VRS. The House plan, that employees will pick up their 5% share of VRS contribution and receive a 5% raise this year to hold them harmless, is in the final budget.
    That’s a good thing for the future of VRS and better than what the governor proposed for state employees (his plan would have had them take a net 2% pay cut). Since the state initially began paying the employees’ share in lieu of a pay raise, it would have broken that agreement to have employees take a pay cut when they went back to paying. This solution is more equitable.

  4. Darrell February 28, 2011 19:14 pm

    So now we have an 80 billion budget. Just curious. How much was it the last time?

Leave your response

Please take a moment to review our comment policy.