The High Bar for Socialism
By | Monday, December 27th, 2010 | Policy

Check out Scott Galupo over at U.S. News and World Report where he details how DeMint, Reagan, and other conservative lodestars are “socialists” by supporting Social Security:

I make these patently silly assertions to illustrate why we need my “high bar,” as Jonah described it, for socialism. If, as Jonah says, “European socialists believe in a mixed economy,” and, as I argue above, Jim DeMint obviously believes in a mixed economy, then we need new terminology–because it has the potential to ensnare all of us. [See a roundup of editorial cartoons about the economy.]

Stanley  argues there’s a lot of headroom in American conservatives’ brand of a mixed economy. But is there really so much headroom? If you had told Barry Goldwater in 1964 that, decades later, some of the most steadfastly conservative members of his party would defend the status quo of Social Security and Medicare, what would he have thought? Would he have seen his fellow Republicans as having repudiated the European social welfare model?

Let’s sort this one out right now.  Any system that redistributes wealth as an end is socialism.  Education, transportation, public safety, and other roles is not socialism — that’s communitarianism (and distinct from socialism or communism).  Taking money and investing in things for the common good?  That is intricately bound to the power of the state.

So for a republic to work effectively, one must have at the bare minimum an educated citizenry, open lanes of communication, and the ability to defend against those who would do the polis harm — whether internally or externally.

…but is it all socialism?  Of course not, though socialism is the inevitable consequence of a citizenry grown to construe their liberty as either tyranny or license.

Certainly there are some things that appear as socialistic.  For instance, could you imagine a law requiring every able-bodied man to appear at the courthouse to participate in a paramilitary organization?!?!   Our 18th century progenitors certainly did — once a month or they paid a heavy fine.  One can hear the squeals from partisans of every stripe in 21st century America should those ordinances ever be revived.  Perhaps they would call it “socialism” or “fascism” or whatever -ism you’d prefer.

There’s another warning in this: words mean things.  The more their definitions incorporate every activity under the sun, the less those words mean.  So tread lightly, Chicken Little.  Not everything that falls from the sky is a socialist plot.


Tags:

Contribute for Conservatism!

Share this post

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed
  • Share this post on Delicious
  • StumbleUpon this post
  • Share this post on Digg
  • Tweet about this post
  • Share this post on Mixx
  • Share this post on Technorati
  • Share this post on Facebook
  • Share this post on NewsVine
  • Share this post on Reddit
  • Share this post on Google
  • Share this post on LinkedIn

About the author

Shaun Kenney

Shaun Kenney is the Chairman of the Fluvanna County Board of Supervisors, former Communications Director for the Republican Party of Virginia, and an active blogger since 2002. Shaun lives in Thomas Jefferson's backyard with his wife, six children, and a modest attempt at a farm in Kents Store, Virginia.

Comments

3 Responses to "The High Bar for Socialism"
  1. Tweets that mention Web: The High Bar for Socialism -- Topsy.com December 27, 2010 15:40 pm

    [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Shaun Kenney. Shaun Kenney said: The High Bar for Socialism http://t.co/VqpGnem via @bearingdrift [...]

  2. Steve Vaughan December 28, 2010 11:04 am

    “There’s another warning in this: words mean things. The more their definitions incorporate every activity under the sun, the less those words mean. ”

    Well said. If people on both sides of the political divide could internalize this principle, we’d have a much higher level of debate in this country. And those who engage in pointless name-calling for purely partisan purposes would be called out on it immediately.

  3. Jason December 28, 2010 13:23 pm

    That anyone would seriously compare Reagan and DeMint to socialists shows how out of touch with reality some people are. Truly we are in need of some serious entitlement reform if we are to survive , but eliminating cold-turkey the programs so many people depend upon would be cruel–almost immoral. Sen. DeMint recognizes that and that doesn’t make him a socialist; it makes him a realist.

Leave your response

Please take a moment to review our comment policy.