Tax rate extension passes easily in House, but with bipartisan support and opposition
By | Friday, December 17th, 2010 | Policy

Early this morning (just after midnight) the Bush-era tax rates were extended for another two years with overwhelming bipartisan support (277-148), but there was also bipartisan discontent.

The tax bill, which includes keeping rates at 2001 and 2003 levels, while returning the Death Tax on those with estates valued at $5 million, received support from U.S. Sens. Jim Webb and Mark Warner and U.S. Reps. Rob Wittman, Glenn Nye, Tom Perriello, Bob Goodlatte, Rick Boucher, and Leader-elect Eric Cantor.

U.S. Reps. Bobby Scott, J. Randy Forbes, Jim Moran and Frank Wolf did not vote in favor of the bill, but for very different reasons.

Scott and Moran voted against keeping the rates low and not hiking them, fearing future budget cuts and Forbes and Wolf opposed not making the tax-cuts permanent. (as did Michele Bachmann and Mike Pence).

Scott said:

“We already know how the incoming Republican Majority will address the deficit – all you need to do is look at the so-called Road Map for America’s Future, introduced by the incoming Republican Chairman of the Budget Committee. By starving Social Security and the rest of the Federal Budget of revenue by passing this package, we will essentially have to adopt the Republican plan and cut Social Security, let Medicare wither on the vine, cut federal college student aid programs, and gut the Education and Labor Departments in order to pay for this.”

Pence provided the conservative’s argument:

“I believe the short-term tax deal negotiated by the White House and Congressional leaders is a bad deal for taxpayers, will do little to create jobs and I cannot support it….

We perpetuate the uncertainty that’s built into our tax code.

Uncertainly is the enemy of our prosperity. And frankly, we can provide assistance to families struggling in this economy by making the hard choices to pay for it without adding to the national debt.”

And Bachmann added:

“Instead of providing economic certainty, Congress has been playing politics with the money that belongs in the pockets of hardworking Americans. In mere days, tax hikes will affect all earners unless Congress acts, but President Obama is insistent upon pairing a tax vote with unfunded spending….I am disheartened that President Obama is pushing for a so-called compromise which will only add to our deficit.”

In the end, the bipartisan support for the bill is summed up by Wittman:

“This legislation stops a massive, looming tax hike for families and businesses,” Wittman said. “In the tax debate there is one simple truth – higher taxes do not get anyone hired. Our economy continues to struggle, and unemployment is too high because of the uncertainty and skyrocketing spending coming out of Washington. This bill’s “cost” assumes that taxpayer dollars earned next year belong to the government! Only in Washington does that logic make sense. I believe that families and small businesses can spend their hard-earned money more wisely than government. This bill isn’t perfect but it’s critical that we stop this tax hike. Congress’s next step to get our economy moving is to address the debt and deficit problem – the first order of business in January. As we begin the 112th Congress, my first priority will be to rein in spending and cut out waste, fraud and abuse in the federal budget. Our future lies not in the size of government, but in the people who drive this country’s prosperity: the entrepreneurs, the innovators, and those who work hard to achieve their American Dream.”


Tags:

Contribute for Conservatism!

Share this post

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed
  • Share this post on Delicious
  • StumbleUpon this post
  • Share this post on Digg
  • Tweet about this post
  • Share this post on Mixx
  • Share this post on Technorati
  • Share this post on Facebook
  • Share this post on NewsVine
  • Share this post on Reddit
  • Share this post on Google
  • Share this post on LinkedIn

About the author

JR Hoeft

Conservative to the core; liberal with his opinion! J.R. has been involved in politics for over a decade and has worked on several campaigns in Hampton Roads. He has served on the Executive Committee of the Republican Party of Chesapeake and the Central Committee of the Republican Party of Virginia. He is also the director of “Blogs United” in Virginia. E-mail J.R.. Follow J.R. on Twitter.

Comments

3 Responses to "Tax rate extension passes easily in House, but with bipartisan support and opposition"
  1. Willie Deutsch December 17, 2010 07:39 am

    Wolf pleasantly shocks me. Forbes, I am glad he continues to stick to his principles. :) Cantor: let’s see what the next 500+ billion stimulus you pass is…

  2. J.R. Hoeft December 17, 2010 09:33 am

    Forbes has always been a man of principle…it’s why I keep voting for him. :-)

    Just got his statement in regarding why he voted “no”…

    “First, the cost of the bill exclusive of the tax extenders will be $136 billion, 100 percent of which is not paid for. This week, the Senate leadership announced another spending bill of $1.2 trillion. At a time when the federal government is borrowing 40 cents of every dollar it spends, and with this enormous appetite for spending, it seems wise to have more certainty regarding the spending offsets before a tax bill is passed.

    “Second, Moody’s has indicated the legislation could impact the nation’s bond rating. This, at the very least, shows why it is important to know the ramifications of the bill before passage. The American people are tired of seeing legislation of this magnitude passed at the last minute when they feel a gun is being held to their heads and careful deliberation is being thrown to the wind. They feel there is a better way, and they elected a new Congress they believe will find it. I share their optimism and feel we can get a better bill with less uncertainty in January.

    “Third, I will continue to fight for the full extension of the tax cuts and for legislation I introduced last January to effectuate a 40% reduction in federal discretionary spending. I am optimistic that we can get the nation’s fiscal house in order and restore our economy.

  3. valentinus December 17, 2010 10:14 am

    The defeat of the Reid Pelosi brontosaurus omnibus eases the annoyance somewhat. We should be thankful the Dems didn’t take this up (and certain other things) in 2009 when they had a super majority in the Senate.

    The Repubs should just do the same tactics the Dems would do under like circumstances. Next year remove the added spending and extend the tax rates at least 5 years. That should be enough time to return to the 1986 Reagan tax regs which are the probably the best we can manage at this time.

Leave your response

The comments section is for meaningful discussion. Readers are reminded to post comments that are germane to the article and write in a common language that steers clear of personal attacks and/or vulgarities.

Please take a moment to review our comment policy.