McDonnell apology on slavery omission is good step towards getting it right on “the recent unpleasantness”
By JR Hoeft | Friday, October 1st, 2010 | Catch-All
Last week, Governor Bob McDonnell apologized for his omission of slavery in this year’s “Confederate History Month” proclamation.
“My major and unacceptable omission of slavery disappointed and hurt a lot of people, myself included,” McDonnell said at a conference at Norfolk State University on the impact of slavery and the Civil War on race relations. “Young people make mistakes, and I suppose sometimes young administrations do as well. Ours was an error of haste and not of heart. And it is an error that will be fixed.”
McDonnell knows that promoting the Sesquicentennial of the Civil War is an important component of Virginia’s tourism marketing plan for the next five years. So, talking about the conflict, and the circumstances that led to it (a topic that still inflames passions), is unavoidable. Unlike former governors Tim Kaine and Mark Warner who stuck their heads-in-the-sand over the subject, McDonnell is taking head-on the “tough stuff” of Virginia’s heritage, and trying to do it the right way.
The governor said that next year he will write a “Civil War History Month” proclamation that will encapsulate all of our history. “It will remember all Virginians — free and enslaved; Union and Confederate. It will be written for all Virginians,” he said.
The suggestion to change the name of the proclamation from “Confederate” to “Civil War” was proposed by Doug Mataconis of Below the Beltway earlier this year. At the time of the initial uproar over the omission, Mataconis wrote:
Instead of just marking the state’s association with a nation with a checkered history, such a month could be a method of remembering the pivotal historic role that the Old Dominion, and it’s citizens, played in the most pivotal event in the history of America. Virginia was, after all, the site of more Civil War battles than any other state, including both the first and the final battles of that war. Moreover, such a month could also serve to remember the Virginian’s who fought for, or otherwise supported, the Union while living in enemy territory; including those Virginian’s who decided to secede from their home state altogether.
McDonnell’s recognition that Virginia’s heritage in the Civil War is much broader in scope than just the Confederacy is an important step at ensuring the focus of the next five years is not on reliving what so bitterly divided this country and state, but on the entire tapestry of our rich, interwoven history; a history full of duty, honor, and sacrifice from all who lived through it; a complete history that should be recognized, remembered, and revered; a history where we can focus on what brings us together.
“You can only respect him for it. He didn’t have to bring it up,” said Norfolk State staffer Beverly Boone Harris. “He could have gone about the business of the day and who would have said something?” (Daily Press)
By facing his obligations and mistakes as Virginia’s governor head-on, McDonnell, once again, has shown his ability to lead and transform the Commonwealth. Whether it’s a VDOT audit, or an historical proclamation, McDonnell’s approach to governing is the same: be accountable and do it right.
What McDonnell did in this circumstance is beyond the subject of race relations or “the recent unpleasantness” between states – he demonstrated to us a lesson in life: recognize when an error has been made, reform, and reconcile.
Tags:
Contribute for Conservatism!
Share this post
About the author
Conservative to the core; liberal with his opinion! J.R. has been involved in politics for over a decade and has worked on several campaigns in Hampton Roads. He has served on the Executive Committee of the Republican Party of Chesapeake and the Central Committee of the Republican Party of Virginia. He is also the director of “Blogs United” in Virginia. E-mail J.R.. Follow J.R. on Twitter.
Comments
13 Responses to "McDonnell apology on slavery omission is good step towards getting it right on “the recent unpleasantness”"
I agree that McDonnell’s apology was heartfelt and step in the right direction.
I like the idea of a “Civil War” rather than “Confederate” proclamation.
What I’d like even better is if we did away with Lee-Jackson Day and instead celebrated a holiday on the anniversary of Virginia rejoining the Union.
As you’re likely aware, Steve, we have a petition to create Virginia Heritage Day in lieu of Lee-Jackson Day.
In the coming months, you’ll hear more about this from us and ideas for when the observance should be held.
JR- I am aware of that and fully supportive. I think I gave you a shout out on my blog about it last year. It’s a brave position for folks affiliated with the Virginia GOP to take, given that so many members of the VGOP have neo-Confederate sympathies.
While I appreciate the apology for the omission, I am not pleased with the governor’s decision not to recognize Confederate history month. We need to stop rewriting history and pandering to the NAACP and other such groups. Our state’s roots are in the south and we should never forget that.
Our state’s roots are in England, and I really don’t want to have a holiday for King George III.
Oh, c’mon Brian, no holiday for Elizabeth either? The “virgin queen” our state is named after? Personally, I’d include that in celebrating Virginia Heritage Day.
How about Princess Di? She was pretty popular in some parts of Virginia.
Dan,
There’s no pandering here…a lot of McDonnell’s African-American supporters-myself included-thought the omission was out of character, but also WAY out of line.
If we’re going to honestly talk about the Confederacy, that discussion HAS to include slavery. And the lesson I took from this whole episode is that neither side of the table is really ready to have that discussion yet.
Kudos to Gov. McDonnell for moving us closer to the point where we can.
If we call it “Civil War Month” can we give Arlington and Alexandria back to D.C.?
When did D.C. ever have Arlington and Alexandria?
The Governor was correct to change the name. But “Civil War History Month” is too boring and doesn’t really get to the point of what we should be remembering.
The best name would be “Democratic Party History Month.” That could be expanded to include all of the damage the Democratic party has done to Virginia and America, not just secession and slavery.
Steve,
Alexandria and Arlington were part of the original design of Washington D.C., completing the square shape of the city. They came back to Virginia sometime in the early to mid 1800s (pre-Civil War)
WArd: Thanks for the info. I didn’t know that.
And I guess Washington had them for a while between 1862-1865 as well.
Leave your response
The comments section is for meaningful discussion. Readers are reminded to post comments that are germane to the article and write in a common language that steers clear of personal attacks and/or vulgarities.
Please take a moment to review our comment policy.