<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bold Colors Win the Day</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bearingdrift.com/2010/07/29/bold-colors-win-the-day/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2010/07/29/bold-colors-win-the-day/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 19:43:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Osborne</title>
		<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2010/07/29/bold-colors-win-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-43693</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Osborne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 20:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearingdrift.com/?p=14471#comment-43693</guid>
		<description>Jason,

I think that it depends on several various factors. Throughout history we have seen ideologies gain a long term &quot;mainstream&quot; status (i.e. Jeffersonian Republicanism, Jacksonian Democracy, Lincoln Republicanism, New Deal coalition, etc...) 

All of these have something in common in that they clearly stated their philosophy while putting it in terms that people could understand. When these ideologies received criticism, they did not break under the pressure, as a result they had a significant influence on history.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason,</p>
<p>I think that it depends on several various factors. Throughout history we have seen ideologies gain a long term &#8220;mainstream&#8221; status (i.e. Jeffersonian Republicanism, Jacksonian Democracy, Lincoln Republicanism, New Deal coalition, etc&#8230;) </p>
<p>All of these have something in common in that they clearly stated their philosophy while putting it in terms that people could understand. When these ideologies received criticism, they did not break under the pressure, as a result they had a significant influence on history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Bold Colors Win the Day &#124; Bearing Drift: Virginia Politics On Demand -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2010/07/29/bold-colors-win-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-43632</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Bold Colors Win the Day &#124; Bearing Drift: Virginia Politics On Demand -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 02:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearingdrift.com/?p=14471#comment-43632</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Bearing Drift, Old Virginia. Old Virginia said: New Blog Post: Bold Colors Win the Day http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/bearingdrift/~3/MI2HXOnmMR0/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Bearing Drift, Old Virginia. Old Virginia said: New Blog Post: Bold Colors Win the Day <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/bearingdrift/~3/MI2HXOnmMR0/" rel="nofollow">http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/bearingdrift/~3/MI2HXOnmMR0/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: On EPA and Arizona, Cuccinelli represents the conservative line &#124; Bearing Drift: Virginia Politics On Demand</title>
		<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2010/07/29/bold-colors-win-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-43628</link>
		<dc:creator>On EPA and Arizona, Cuccinelli represents the conservative line &#124; Bearing Drift: Virginia Politics On Demand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 01:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearingdrift.com/?p=14471#comment-43628</guid>
		<description>[...] out yesterday, Cuccinelli represents a large portion of Virginians who welcome his refreshing &#8220;bold color&#8221;-type approach to carrying out the duties his [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] out yesterday, Cuccinelli represents a large portion of Virginians who welcome his refreshing &#8220;bold color&#8221;-type approach to carrying out the duties his [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessica Sandlin</title>
		<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2010/07/29/bold-colors-win-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-43619</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessica Sandlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 18:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearingdrift.com/?p=14471#comment-43619</guid>
		<description>But is the Tea Party movement really &quot;far to the right&quot; of the Republican party, as the article states?  It seems to me that on social issues, many Tea Party folks take a stance closer to the Democrats (or closer to what would be a true conservative stance):  e.g., not giving a hoot about gay marriage.  I was just talking to a 96-year-old woman who identifies with the Tea Party, and on abortion and gay rights she fell squarely on the more liberal side (pro-choice, pro-equal-rights).

Many folks I&#039;ve met identify themselves as Democrats or Independents (though they are pro-small-gov&#039;t, and are fiscal conservatives) precisely because they cannot stomach the Ken Cuccinellis of the Republican party.  Perhaps on fiscal issues, many of us see eye-to-eye with the AG, but on social issues, he is as far as east from west for most.  Republicans must re-learn what Mr. Jefferson said, &quot;In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock.&quot;  If we do this, we will find the influx of voters from the Obama backlash doesn&#039;t depart the party by February.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But is the Tea Party movement really &#8220;far to the right&#8221; of the Republican party, as the article states?  It seems to me that on social issues, many Tea Party folks take a stance closer to the Democrats (or closer to what would be a true conservative stance):  e.g., not giving a hoot about gay marriage.  I was just talking to a 96-year-old woman who identifies with the Tea Party, and on abortion and gay rights she fell squarely on the more liberal side (pro-choice, pro-equal-rights).</p>
<p>Many folks I&#8217;ve met identify themselves as Democrats or Independents (though they are pro-small-gov&#8217;t, and are fiscal conservatives) precisely because they cannot stomach the Ken Cuccinellis of the Republican party.  Perhaps on fiscal issues, many of us see eye-to-eye with the AG, but on social issues, he is as far as east from west for most.  Republicans must re-learn what Mr. Jefferson said, &#8220;In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock.&#8221;  If we do this, we will find the influx of voters from the Obama backlash doesn&#8217;t depart the party by February.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2010/07/29/bold-colors-win-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-43597</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 01:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearingdrift.com/?p=14471#comment-43597</guid>
		<description>Do you think this is a lasting &quot;mainstreamization&quot; of bold conservatism or a temporary reaction to the extreme liberalism of the Obama Administration?  These polls seem to fluctuate over the years based on the issue(s) du jour.  (I&#039;m not disagreeing with you, just trying to dig a little deeper to see if we can find some long-term trends.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you think this is a lasting &#8220;mainstreamization&#8221; of bold conservatism or a temporary reaction to the extreme liberalism of the Obama Administration?  These polls seem to fluctuate over the years based on the issue(s) du jour.  (I&#8217;m not disagreeing with you, just trying to dig a little deeper to see if we can find some long-term trends.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
