Krystal’s Ball a little cloudy
By | Monday, June 21st, 2010 | Politics

I have to hand it to Krystal Ball, nominee for the Democrats running against my Congressman (Rob Wittman). It takes hard work to upset the Free Lance-Star as much as she did.

The FLS has an annoying habit of leaning ever so slightly right-of-center while ripping any local Republican within their field of vision (as a Republican nominee for Spotsylvania Board of Supervisors, I can speak from personal experience). So, one has to ask what led the editors of the Rappahannock River’s MSM wannabe to come to Wittman’s defense so strongly.

It turned out to be the nonsense Ball put on her first mailer.

First off, the editors are unhappy that ball put words in their mouths:

In her first political mailer of the race, Ms. Ball, a Democrat, didn’t resort to greasy deception–she started out that way. For one thing, the piece cites a Free Lance-Star link beneath the words “Wittman won’t go against the Republican establishment even when voters beg him to be aggressive in what’s going on in Washington.” Neither the words nor the sentiment ever surfaced in a Free Lance-Star editorial–surely a natural inference–nor does the cited link contain that verbiage–though an average reader would conclude that the mailer’s words are a direct quote.

The citation is of a news story chiefly about Mr. Wittman’s primary race, and reflects a view voiced by a supporter of Yosemite Sam acolyte Susan Crabill (sic), whom Mr. Wittman beat about 4-to-1.

In other words, Ball is attributing to the paper’s writers/editors a line actually said by a Crabillite (not that the paper did any favors by getting Cathy Crabill’s name wrong). Oops.

More to the point, the actual line is thoroughly off-base no matter who said it. In fact, in the biggest vote of his career, Rob Wittman opposed his party leaders in Congress – including neighbor Eric Cantor – and even opposed his own party’s President (George W. Bush) to vote against TARP (i.e., the bank bailout).

As none other that the editors of the FLS actually said: “Rob Wittman, meanwhile, should be every Washington-weary American’s cup of tea.”

What else upset that FLS crew? In their own words . . .

Ms. Ball’s mailbox gift to 1st District households also charges, “Wittman was ranked last in effectiveness of all Congressmen from Virginia.” Indeed, Mr. Wittman’s sole “power ranking” by KnowLegis, a lobbying information firm, places Mr. Wittman a pitiable 432nd among 435 House members for the year 2007. But, apparently to hold down typesetting fees, the mailer omits the crucial KnowLegis notations: “Too few terms or years in office in Congress to have significant clout” and “Member has reduced power due to Freshman status.”

That’s putting it mildly. Mr. Wittman joined Congress on Dec. 13, 2007–four days before it adjourned for the holidays. Of course he had no clout: The congressional year expired almost as soon as he found his office bathroom! Mr. Wittman was a late arriver because he had to win a special election following the tragic death of Rep. Jo Ann Davis from breast cancer. Upon such circumstances does Krystal Ball build her tower of legerdemain.

The editors next line is as follows:

Ms. Ball, in fact, has all but disqualified herself from this race. Whatever Washington needs, we’re pretty sure it’s not more clever deception, not more half- and quarter-truths, not more contempt for common decency.

Ouch!

How disastrous was Ball’s mailer? Put aside whatever biases you may have – one way or the other – and look at it this way: Ball’s mailer led to a perfect negative ad against her for which the Wittman campaign paid no money, exerted no energy, and therefore risks no blowback.

A number of people were initially impressed with Krystal Ball’s ability to raise money, but if she keeps shooting herself in the foot like this . . .

Cross-posted to RWL


Tags:

Contribute for Conservatism!

Share this post

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed
  • Share this post on Delicious
  • StumbleUpon this post
  • Share this post on Digg
  • Tweet about this post
  • Share this post on Mixx
  • Share this post on Technorati
  • Share this post on Facebook
  • Share this post on NewsVine
  • Share this post on Reddit
  • Share this post on Google
  • Share this post on LinkedIn

About the author

D.J. McGuire

Former candidate for Board of Supervisors in Spotsylvania, current blogger, economics teacher, and long-rumored windbag. There are two causes closest to the heart: steering the country away from the social democratic nonsense that is sinking Europe, and convincing the rest of the "rightosphere" that the NBA really is a joy to watch.

Comments

6 Responses to "Krystal’s Ball a little cloudy"
  1. Krystal’s Ball a little cloudy « The right-wing liberal June 21, 2010 13:34 pm

    [...] Cross-posted to BD [...]

  2. Tweets that mention Krystal’s Ball a little cloudy | Bearing Drift: Virginia Politics On Demand -- Topsy.com June 21, 2010 14:40 pm

    [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by virginiaBNN, Bearing Drift. Bearing Drift said: Web: Krystal’s Ball a little cloudy http://bit.ly/ad56ar [...]

  3. steve vaughan June 21, 2010 15:23 pm

    For Ball’s mailer to have been “disastrous” she would first have had to have the slightest chance of beating Wittman. She does not. That’s not her fault. The 1st District, as currently drawn, can not possibly be won by a Democrat any more than the 3rd District could be won by a Republican.

  4. Govgirl June 21, 2010 18:50 pm

    I was one of the recipients of this lovely mailer and have a few comments to add. Now, in additioin to all of the factual nonsense seen above, Ball further shows her (or her campaign’s) incompetnece, poor research, or underhanded tactics in the timing of said mailer. This mailer arrived on the Saturday before the primary, and unless read closely it was not obvious that it indeed came from Ball’s campaign. In addition to this, I am what is classified as a HARD R in the political world. Meaning I have voted in every Republican primary since moving to the state of VA and this information is easily attainable by a very quick search in Voter Vault or the Democrat equivalent. Sending this mailer to me was a waste of money, unless the goal (as the timing suggests) was to hope I would not read the source of said mailer, believe its content and go vote for Cathrine Crabill, none of which happened in my case and based on the primary results I conclude that I am not the exception. As for it only being a disaster if she stood a chance of winning, well – maybe in this particular election yes, but the 1st might not always be what it is now, and Ball has basically disqualified her self from every running again.

  5. Craig Kilby June 22, 2010 19:43 pm

    I completely agree with GovGirl on this one. This mailer was completely designed to “trick” people into voting for that Crabill thing. (Can’t even call her Right Wing, because she is so far out there it is obvious she doesn’t have wings–just a beanie with a propeller).

    The ultra-slick, churlish mailer obviously fooled no one, and was a complete waste of Krystal Ball’s campaign money, unless she was trying to help improve Rob’s showing in the primary. Talk about blow-back.

  6. Krystal Ball September 27, 2010 16:57 pm

    You guys are liars! I never said any of that crap! I am a woman! I R nt the type of person that likes you people. cant you understand that your wrong. Mentos keep your breath fresh! your lucky my cousin Rock Sand isnt here she would kick your hiney!

Leave your response

Please take a moment to review our comment policy.