<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Catherine Crabill Doesn&#8217;t Need a Bullet Box&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bearingdrift.com/2010/06/07/catherine-crabill-doesnt-need-a-bullet-box/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2010/06/07/catherine-crabill-doesnt-need-a-bullet-box/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 23:18:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Old Redneck</title>
		<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2010/06/07/catherine-crabill-doesnt-need-a-bullet-box/#comment-43285</link>
		<dc:creator>Old Redneck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 08:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearingdrift.com/?p=13648#comment-43285</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t the Crabill&#039;s move to Virginia from Arizona (or one of those arid western states) -- one step ahead of the law?

Maybe that&#039;s where they declared bankruptcy.

Meanwhile, entertain yourself with this:

http://www.imsurroundedbyidiots.com/2009/04/16/a-lengthy-piece-detailing-catherine-crabills-delusional-insane-conspiracy-theories/

If that link doesn&#039;t work, try this one:
http://tinyurl.com/ne2a4k</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t the Crabill&#8217;s move to Virginia from Arizona (or one of those arid western states) &#8212; one step ahead of the law?</p>
<p>Maybe that&#8217;s where they declared bankruptcy.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, entertain yourself with this:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.imsurroundedbyidiots.com/2009/04/16/a-lengthy-piece-detailing-catherine-crabills-delusional-insane-conspiracy-theories/" rel="nofollow">http://www.imsurroundedbyidiots.com/2009/04/16/a-lengthy-piece-detailing-catherine-crabills-delusional-insane-conspiracy-theories/</a></p>
<p>If that link doesn&#8217;t work, try this one:<br />
<a href="http://tinyurl.com/ne2a4k" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/ne2a4k</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Kilby</title>
		<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2010/06/07/catherine-crabill-doesnt-need-a-bullet-box/#comment-42973</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Kilby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 04:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearingdrift.com/?p=13648#comment-42973</guid>
		<description>i have interrogated my source on this many times based on the vehement denials by some here. My source is steadfast in his statements. I cannot name this person nor the financial institution for which this person works--one of many parties in the suit. Suffice it to say, this may be one reason why the voter turn-out in Lancaster was an incredible 20% compared to the rest of the state of roughly 5%, though the results were just the same as elsewhere as in the 1st district. A resounding YES to Rob Wittman. A resounding NO to Catherine Crabill. As I stated earlier, if I am wrong, I&#039;ll be the very first to admit it. I think I made it clear from the beginning my information came from &quot;reliable hearsay.&quot; I do not know this to be a fact.

The person who told me this had no dog in this fight, is completely apolitical except to serve on juries when called to do so, and had no reason to make it up out of whole cloth. The office in which this person works, however, was elated at the election results. As were 85% of Lancaster GOP primary voters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i have interrogated my source on this many times based on the vehement denials by some here. My source is steadfast in his statements. I cannot name this person nor the financial institution for which this person works&#8211;one of many parties in the suit. Suffice it to say, this may be one reason why the voter turn-out in Lancaster was an incredible 20% compared to the rest of the state of roughly 5%, though the results were just the same as elsewhere as in the 1st district. A resounding YES to Rob Wittman. A resounding NO to Catherine Crabill. As I stated earlier, if I am wrong, I&#8217;ll be the very first to admit it. I think I made it clear from the beginning my information came from &#8220;reliable hearsay.&#8221; I do not know this to be a fact.</p>
<p>The person who told me this had no dog in this fight, is completely apolitical except to serve on juries when called to do so, and had no reason to make it up out of whole cloth. The office in which this person works, however, was elated at the election results. As were 85% of Lancaster GOP primary voters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy Watson</title>
		<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2010/06/07/catherine-crabill-doesnt-need-a-bullet-box/#comment-40220</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy Watson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2010 16:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearingdrift.com/?p=13648#comment-40220</guid>
		<description>Correction my last post. Last sentence in the second paragraph should end: &quot;[...] I have access to every record associated with bankruptcies filed in every court in &lt;strong&gt;the United States.&lt;/strong&gt;&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correction my last post. Last sentence in the second paragraph should end: &#8220;[...] I have access to every record associated with bankruptcies filed in every court in <strong>the United States.</strong>&#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy Watson</title>
		<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2010/06/07/catherine-crabill-doesnt-need-a-bullet-box/#comment-40219</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy Watson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2010 15:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearingdrift.com/?p=13648#comment-40219</guid>
		<description>@Craig Kilby
There&#039;s no truth to what you&#039;ve been saying, there&#039;s absolutely no record of any bankruptcy.

You said that &quot;[b]ankruptcy records are not easy to find&quot;. Really? I spent an hour waiting for the federal government to process my PACER registration and I have access to every record associated with bankruptcies filed in every court in Virginia.

You&#039;re full of crap, so why don&#039;t you find something important to do? Maybe if people learn how full of crap you are, it&#039;ll have a negative impact on your business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Craig Kilby<br />
There&#8217;s no truth to what you&#8217;ve been saying, there&#8217;s absolutely no record of any bankruptcy.</p>
<p>You said that &#8220;[b]ankruptcy records are not easy to find&#8221;. Really? I spent an hour waiting for the federal government to process my PACER registration and I have access to every record associated with bankruptcies filed in every court in Virginia.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re full of crap, so why don&#8217;t you find something important to do? Maybe if people learn how full of crap you are, it&#8217;ll have a negative impact on your business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Kilby</title>
		<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2010/06/07/catherine-crabill-doesnt-need-a-bullet-box/#comment-40125</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Kilby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 19:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearingdrift.com/?p=13648#comment-40125</guid>
		<description>If Ms. Crabill wants to sue me for libel, I am sure she has a very capable lawyer. So do I. The Truth is its own defense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Ms. Crabill wants to sue me for libel, I am sure she has a very capable lawyer. So do I. The Truth is its own defense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian W. Schoeneman</title>
		<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2010/06/07/catherine-crabill-doesnt-need-a-bullet-box/#comment-40093</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian W. Schoeneman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 14:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearingdrift.com/?p=13648#comment-40093</guid>
		<description>First of all, Catherine is a public figure. So in order to prevail in a defamation case, which as Timothy says is not a crime only a civil action, she would have to prove that Craig was acting with malicious intent. That&#039;s an extremely high standard and one that I don&#039;t expect she could meet based on the comments in this thread. 

So just call him a jerk, and be done with it. Stop with the faux-lawyering.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, Catherine is a public figure. So in order to prevail in a defamation case, which as Timothy says is not a crime only a civil action, she would have to prove that Craig was acting with malicious intent. That&#8217;s an extremely high standard and one that I don&#8217;t expect she could meet based on the comments in this thread. </p>
<p>So just call him a jerk, and be done with it. Stop with the faux-lawyering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy Watson</title>
		<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2010/06/07/catherine-crabill-doesnt-need-a-bullet-box/#comment-40082</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy Watson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 10:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearingdrift.com/?p=13648#comment-40082</guid>
		<description>@Nancy Stanley
Libel is not a crime in Virginia unless someone has insulted a woman&#039;s virtue and chastity (Va. Code §18.2-417).

Besides, everything that I&#039;ve said or written has been true, as is this blog post and comments with the exception of the junk coming out of Craig Kilby.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Nancy Stanley<br />
Libel is not a crime in Virginia unless someone has insulted a woman&#8217;s virtue and chastity (Va. Code §18.2-417).</p>
<p>Besides, everything that I&#8217;ve said or written has been true, as is this blog post and comments with the exception of the junk coming out of Craig Kilby.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Talley</title>
		<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2010/06/07/catherine-crabill-doesnt-need-a-bullet-box/#comment-40043</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Talley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 02:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearingdrift.com/?p=13648#comment-40043</guid>
		<description>Who cares about bankruptcy. How about the whole Truther thing. Her ideas about Oklahoma, her saying that many in Congress need to be tried and executed for treason.

How about these rantings?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who cares about bankruptcy. How about the whole Truther thing. Her ideas about Oklahoma, her saying that many in Congress need to be tried and executed for treason.</p>
<p>How about these rantings?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nancy Stanley</title>
		<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2010/06/07/catherine-crabill-doesnt-need-a-bullet-box/#comment-40041</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy Stanley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 02:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearingdrift.com/?p=13648#comment-40041</guid>
		<description>definition of LIBEL:

libel 1) n. to publish in print (including pictures), writing or broadcast through radio, television or film, an untruth about another which will do harm to that person or his/her reputation, by tending to bring the target into ridicule, hatred, scorn or contempt of others. Libel is the written or broadcast form of defamation, distinguished from slander which is oral defamation. It is a tort (civil wrong) making the person or entity (like a newspaper, magazine or political organization) open to a lawsuit for damages by the person who can prove the statement about him/her was a lie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>definition of LIBEL:</p>
<p>libel 1) n. to publish in print (including pictures), writing or broadcast through radio, television or film, an untruth about another which will do harm to that person or his/her reputation, by tending to bring the target into ridicule, hatred, scorn or contempt of others. Libel is the written or broadcast form of defamation, distinguished from slander which is oral defamation. It is a tort (civil wrong) making the person or entity (like a newspaper, magazine or political organization) open to a lawsuit for damages by the person who can prove the statement about him/her was a lie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nancy Stanley</title>
		<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2010/06/07/catherine-crabill-doesnt-need-a-bullet-box/#comment-40040</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy Stanley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 02:25:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearingdrift.com/?p=13648#comment-40040</guid>
		<description>And yes, her name is spelled C-A-T-H-E-R-I-N-E as in Catherine the Great!

And if you actually knew her you would find that she is.  But you don&#039;t so you won&#039;t.  And you throw your fiery darts from afar...because it&#039;s easy for you to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And yes, her name is spelled C-A-T-H-E-R-I-N-E as in Catherine the Great!</p>
<p>And if you actually knew her you would find that she is.  But you don&#8217;t so you won&#8217;t.  And you throw your fiery darts from afar&#8230;because it&#8217;s easy for you to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nancy Stanley</title>
		<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2010/06/07/catherine-crabill-doesnt-need-a-bullet-box/#comment-40039</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy Stanley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 02:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearingdrift.com/?p=13648#comment-40039</guid>
		<description>Oh, Craig Kilby---I am Catherine&#039;s sister...now will you be satisified with my reply above?  You are a liar and are contributing to the spread of a lie.  STOP!  Enough!  Why are you SO determined to assasinate another person&#039;s character who has done nothing wrong OR illegal.  Each of us as individuals have a right to run for office (as allowed by the law).  Incumbent does not translate to life long term.  Everyone requires challenging!!!! Everyone!!! Catherine Thorsen Crabill has never filed bankruptcy.  CALL HER and ask if you must - she is in the phone book!  She actually answers her phone when she&#039;s at home. But stop the lies.  It calls into question your character.  Really, give it a rest.  AND be humble enough (that would improve your level of character) to apologize and state that you are WRONG!  Catherine, even if you disagree with what she says or stands for, has the depth character to apologize publicly when she has been wrong.  So either apologize or STOP criticizing her and attacking her.  It&#039;s cowardless.

Nancy Thorsen Stanley</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, Craig Kilby&#8212;I am Catherine&#8217;s sister&#8230;now will you be satisified with my reply above?  You are a liar and are contributing to the spread of a lie.  STOP!  Enough!  Why are you SO determined to assasinate another person&#8217;s character who has done nothing wrong OR illegal.  Each of us as individuals have a right to run for office (as allowed by the law).  Incumbent does not translate to life long term.  Everyone requires challenging!!!! Everyone!!! Catherine Thorsen Crabill has never filed bankruptcy.  CALL HER and ask if you must &#8211; she is in the phone book!  She actually answers her phone when she&#8217;s at home. But stop the lies.  It calls into question your character.  Really, give it a rest.  AND be humble enough (that would improve your level of character) to apologize and state that you are WRONG!  Catherine, even if you disagree with what she says or stands for, has the depth character to apologize publicly when she has been wrong.  So either apologize or STOP criticizing her and attacking her.  It&#8217;s cowardless.</p>
<p>Nancy Thorsen Stanley</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Britt Howard</title>
		<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2010/06/07/catherine-crabill-doesnt-need-a-bullet-box/#comment-40032</link>
		<dc:creator>Britt Howard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 01:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearingdrift.com/?p=13648#comment-40032</guid>
		<description>DJ, I was also thinking of Mayor Will Sessoms and Paul Lantiegne and others.

Good to see who gets away with it. I guess you have to start somewhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DJ, I was also thinking of Mayor Will Sessoms and Paul Lantiegne and others.</p>
<p>Good to see who gets away with it. I guess you have to start somewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy Watson</title>
		<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2010/06/07/catherine-crabill-doesnt-need-a-bullet-box/#comment-40024</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy Watson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 23:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearingdrift.com/?p=13648#comment-40024</guid>
		<description>@Craig Kilby
Nice how you obfuscated out of responding to my comment that there has been no bankruptcy filing by a Catherine T. Thorsen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Craig Kilby<br />
Nice how you obfuscated out of responding to my comment that there has been no bankruptcy filing by a Catherine T. Thorsen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Kilby</title>
		<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2010/06/07/catherine-crabill-doesnt-need-a-bullet-box/#comment-40015</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Kilby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 22:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearingdrift.com/?p=13648#comment-40015</guid>
		<description>I am not a Party member per se, and I hold no position within the Party, and don&#039;t plan to. Still, I vote Republican consistently and have, in my past, held elective office as a Republican. The only time I voted for a Democrat was last fall when the choice was between Catherine Crabhill (who is NOT a Republican though she ran on that ticket, which is another story) and Albert Pollard, a very well-liked person who had held the seat previously. I prefer to keep my right to speak my mind over being kicked out of a GOP Party position. If this somehow bars me from voting in the GOP primary in the future, so be it. I proudly voted for Rob Wittman and as far as I know, I can do so again come this fall. If someone passes a law telling me otherwise, I will see them in Court.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not a Party member per se, and I hold no position within the Party, and don&#8217;t plan to. Still, I vote Republican consistently and have, in my past, held elective office as a Republican. The only time I voted for a Democrat was last fall when the choice was between Catherine Crabhill (who is NOT a Republican though she ran on that ticket, which is another story) and Albert Pollard, a very well-liked person who had held the seat previously. I prefer to keep my right to speak my mind over being kicked out of a GOP Party position. If this somehow bars me from voting in the GOP primary in the future, so be it. I proudly voted for Rob Wittman and as far as I know, I can do so again come this fall. If someone passes a law telling me otherwise, I will see them in Court.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy Watson</title>
		<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2010/06/07/catherine-crabill-doesnt-need-a-bullet-box/#comment-40013</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy Watson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 21:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearingdrift.com/?p=13648#comment-40013</guid>
		<description>The relevant paragraph from the Party Plan:
&quot;A member of an Official Committee is held to a higher standard of support for nominees of the Republican Party than an
individual who merely participates in a mass meeting, party canvass, convention or primary. Therefore, a member of an
Official Committee is deemed to have resigned his Committee position if he (a) makes a reportable contribution to and/or
(b) allows his name to be publicly used by and/or (c) makes a written or other public statement in support of a candidate
in opposition to a Republican nominee in a Virginia General or Special Election. Such member may be re-instated by a
majority vote of the other members of the Committee.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The relevant paragraph from the Party Plan:<br />
&#8220;A member of an Official Committee is held to a higher standard of support for nominees of the Republican Party than an<br />
individual who merely participates in a mass meeting, party canvass, convention or primary. Therefore, a member of an<br />
Official Committee is deemed to have resigned his Committee position if he (a) makes a reportable contribution to and/or<br />
(b) allows his name to be publicly used by and/or (c) makes a written or other public statement in support of a candidate<br />
in opposition to a Republican nominee in a Virginia General or Special Election. Such member may be re-instated by a<br />
majority vote of the other members of the Committee.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

