<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UPDATED: Governor Issues Executive Directive On Discrimination (LG and AG respond)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bearingdrift.com/2010/03/10/governor-issues-executive-directive-on-discrimination/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2010/03/10/governor-issues-executive-directive-on-discrimination/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 20:13:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Grierson</title>
		<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2010/03/10/governor-issues-executive-directive-on-discrimination/#comment-30745</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Grierson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearingdrift.com/?p=11886#comment-30745</guid>
		<description>It sounds like you are agreeing with me on my hypothetical.  I don&#039;t think anyone&#039;s ever said the governor has the power to provide some form of permanent protection via executive order--the governors who follow him can always rescind the order.  So, if Cuccinelli (who seems to have started running for governor already) is elected, he can always do away with the policy when he becomes governor.  That doesn&#039;t mean that implementing the order is beyond the governor&#039;s authority, just that it&#039;s not guaranteed to outlast his administration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sounds like you are agreeing with me on my hypothetical.  I don&#8217;t think anyone&#8217;s ever said the governor has the power to provide some form of permanent protection via executive order&#8211;the governors who follow him can always rescind the order.  So, if Cuccinelli (who seems to have started running for governor already) is elected, he can always do away with the policy when he becomes governor.  That doesn&#8217;t mean that implementing the order is beyond the governor&#8217;s authority, just that it&#8217;s not guaranteed to outlast his administration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JR Hoeft</title>
		<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2010/03/10/governor-issues-executive-directive-on-discrimination/#comment-30352</link>
		<dc:creator>JR Hoeft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 05:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearingdrift.com/?p=11886#comment-30352</guid>
		<description>Kevin,
You&#039;re right to point out the difference in tone.  However, we&#039;ve never been shy about stating we are a conservative blog that favors the GOP.

Language is generally different between friends and foes.  I don&#039;t think that&#039;s even an issue.

I appreciate your bringing racial civil rights into the discussion - and while the governor can certainly provide some protection, permanent and legally binding protection doesn&#039;t occur until the legislature acts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin,<br />
You&#8217;re right to point out the difference in tone.  However, we&#8217;ve never been shy about stating we are a conservative blog that favors the GOP.</p>
<p>Language is generally different between friends and foes.  I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s even an issue.</p>
<p>I appreciate your bringing racial civil rights into the discussion &#8211; and while the governor can certainly provide some protection, permanent and legally binding protection doesn&#8217;t occur until the legislature acts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Grierson</title>
		<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2010/03/10/governor-issues-executive-directive-on-discrimination/#comment-30348</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Grierson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 04:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearingdrift.com/?p=11886#comment-30348</guid>
		<description>Fair enough regarding the different authors, Jim, though I&#039;m still waiting to see the same kind of snarky comments aimed at McDonnell that have been leveled at Kaine for taking the same action. 

I disagree that the employment policies of the Commonwealth are necessarily a legislative matter, however. In fact, such functions are traditionally executive in nature, with the legislature stepping in only to set limits. It&#039;s the executive&#039;s job, within the bounds of the law, to decide what hiring and other practices will work best for the state. The idea that you can&#039;t grant more rights to your employees than the law allows is silly--the law sets a floor, not a ceiling.  

Let&#039;s say, for example, that race was not a protected class (wasn&#039;t THAT long ago it wasn&#039;t the case).  Are you saying that in, say, 1964, the Governor of Virginia couldn&#039;t have prohibited employment discrimination on the basis of race in state employment even if he wanted to?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair enough regarding the different authors, Jim, though I&#8217;m still waiting to see the same kind of snarky comments aimed at McDonnell that have been leveled at Kaine for taking the same action. </p>
<p>I disagree that the employment policies of the Commonwealth are necessarily a legislative matter, however. In fact, such functions are traditionally executive in nature, with the legislature stepping in only to set limits. It&#8217;s the executive&#8217;s job, within the bounds of the law, to decide what hiring and other practices will work best for the state. The idea that you can&#8217;t grant more rights to your employees than the law allows is silly&#8211;the law sets a floor, not a ceiling.  </p>
<p>Let&#8217;s say, for example, that race was not a protected class (wasn&#8217;t THAT long ago it wasn&#8217;t the case).  Are you saying that in, say, 1964, the Governor of Virginia couldn&#8217;t have prohibited employment discrimination on the basis of race in state employment even if he wanted to?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Waters</title>
		<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2010/03/10/governor-issues-executive-directive-on-discrimination/#comment-30347</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Waters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 04:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearingdrift.com/?p=11886#comment-30347</guid>
		<description>Good job Jim!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good job Jim!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gill Robb</title>
		<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2010/03/10/governor-issues-executive-directive-on-discrimination/#comment-30346</link>
		<dc:creator>Gill Robb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 03:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearingdrift.com/?p=11886#comment-30346</guid>
		<description>White Men should be asking why they are now the ONLY group of citizens in America who do not have any special protections under the law.

We truly have a Republic that is just like Animal Farm, where some citizens are now, &quot;more equal&quot; than others. 

Let the revolution begin!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>White Men should be asking why they are now the ONLY group of citizens in America who do not have any special protections under the law.</p>
<p>We truly have a Republic that is just like Animal Farm, where some citizens are now, &#8220;more equal&#8221; than others. </p>
<p>Let the revolution begin!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JR Hoeft</title>
		<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2010/03/10/governor-issues-executive-directive-on-discrimination/#comment-30344</link>
		<dc:creator>JR Hoeft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 03:44:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearingdrift.com/?p=11886#comment-30344</guid>
		<description>Well, for one, Kevin, it&#039;s two different authors.

Second, I do think McDonnell is wrong here.

Third, this issue is a legislative one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, for one, Kevin, it&#8217;s two different authors.</p>
<p>Second, I do think McDonnell is wrong here.</p>
<p>Third, this issue is a legislative one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Grierson</title>
		<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2010/03/10/governor-issues-executive-directive-on-discrimination/#comment-30342</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Grierson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 03:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearingdrift.com/?p=11886#comment-30342</guid>
		<description>I find it humorous (not to mention a tad hypocritical) that the previous post on Cuccinelli&#039;s statement took Governors Kaine and Warner to task for protecting gays by executive order when they are not protected by law (&quot;Under Warner and Kaine, they knew that they couldn’t have a new “protected status” pass the legislature, so they added it as an executive order.&quot;), but then this post says nary a word of criticism when McDonnell, who criticized Kaine&#039;s move when he was AG, did pretty much THE EXACT SAME THING.

So, an action by Democrat=wrong, same action by Republican=right. Am I missing something?

FWIW, I agree with both governors--it&#039;s senseless to evaluate state employment by criteria other than qualifications and performance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it humorous (not to mention a tad hypocritical) that the previous post on Cuccinelli&#8217;s statement took Governors Kaine and Warner to task for protecting gays by executive order when they are not protected by law (&#8220;Under Warner and Kaine, they knew that they couldn’t have a new “protected status” pass the legislature, so they added it as an executive order.&#8221;), but then this post says nary a word of criticism when McDonnell, who criticized Kaine&#8217;s move when he was AG, did pretty much THE EXACT SAME THING.</p>
<p>So, an action by Democrat=wrong, same action by Republican=right. Am I missing something?</p>
<p>FWIW, I agree with both governors&#8211;it&#8217;s senseless to evaluate state employment by criteria other than qualifications and performance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2010/03/10/governor-issues-executive-directive-on-discrimination/#comment-30318</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 22:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearingdrift.com/?p=11886#comment-30318</guid>
		<description>So glad he did this...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So glad he did this&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brittney</title>
		<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2010/03/10/governor-issues-executive-directive-on-discrimination/#comment-30313</link>
		<dc:creator>brittney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearingdrift.com/?p=11886#comment-30313</guid>
		<description>kudos to Mcdonnell for todays decision!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kudos to Mcdonnell for todays decision!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dc</title>
		<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2010/03/10/governor-issues-executive-directive-on-discrimination/#comment-30312</link>
		<dc:creator>dc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearingdrift.com/?p=11886#comment-30312</guid>
		<description>Thank you for the clarification.

I think many people are a little skiddish re: the new Governor and see his early moves (guns in bars, no school breakfast for needy children, etc.) as unnerving shifts to the right. Whether or not these concerns are founded, the general feeling is he is moving our state embarrassingly backwards. Let&#039;s hope the Governor proves his naysayers wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the clarification.</p>
<p>I think many people are a little skiddish re: the new Governor and see his early moves (guns in bars, no school breakfast for needy children, etc.) as unnerving shifts to the right. Whether or not these concerns are founded, the general feeling is he is moving our state embarrassingly backwards. Let&#8217;s hope the Governor proves his naysayers wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom White</title>
		<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2010/03/10/governor-issues-executive-directive-on-discrimination/#comment-30311</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearingdrift.com/?p=11886#comment-30311</guid>
		<description>DC - The AG&#039;s office was simply stating what is in Virginia Law. It is a complete misunderstanding to believe that Ken is declaring open season on gays. He stated his legal opinion based on Virginia law. Bob and Bill went to the 14th amendment and I believe beyond that to say discrimination for sexual orientation - or other reasons unrelated to the job - will not be tolerated. Period.

One&#039;s sexual orientation has absolutely nothing to do with how well you do a job. It is, and should be, a non issue.

I think these statements put it in no uncertain terms. Discrimination because of sexual orientation will not be allowed in the State while Bob McDonnell is Governor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DC &#8211; The AG&#8217;s office was simply stating what is in Virginia Law. It is a complete misunderstanding to believe that Ken is declaring open season on gays. He stated his legal opinion based on Virginia law. Bob and Bill went to the 14th amendment and I believe beyond that to say discrimination for sexual orientation &#8211; or other reasons unrelated to the job &#8211; will not be tolerated. Period.</p>
<p>One&#8217;s sexual orientation has absolutely nothing to do with how well you do a job. It is, and should be, a non issue.</p>
<p>I think these statements put it in no uncertain terms. Discrimination because of sexual orientation will not be allowed in the State while Bob McDonnell is Governor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dc</title>
		<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2010/03/10/governor-issues-executive-directive-on-discrimination/#comment-30309</link>
		<dc:creator>dc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearingdrift.com/?p=11886#comment-30309</guid>
		<description>ok. It just doesn&#039;t feel like it when the attorney general makes statements like this: 

&quot;In recent days, Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli issued a letter to Virginia’s colleges and universities informing them that their internal employment discrimination policies could not prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation because such prohibitions were not authorized under state law.&quot;

So, can they prohibit discrimination or not? Has the A.G. amended his statement? or does this recent statement by the Governor cancel out the A.G.&#039;s statement?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok. It just doesn&#8217;t feel like it when the attorney general makes statements like this: </p>
<p>&#8220;In recent days, Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli issued a letter to Virginia’s colleges and universities informing them that their internal employment discrimination policies could not prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation because such prohibitions were not authorized under state law.&#8221;</p>
<p>So, can they prohibit discrimination or not? Has the A.G. amended his statement? or does this recent statement by the Governor cancel out the A.G.&#8217;s statement?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lt. Gov. Bolling on Non-Discrimination Issue &#124; Virginia Right!</title>
		<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2010/03/10/governor-issues-executive-directive-on-discrimination/#comment-30308</link>
		<dc:creator>Lt. Gov. Bolling on Non-Discrimination Issue &#124; Virginia Right!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearingdrift.com/?p=11886#comment-30308</guid>
		<description>[...] Gov. Bolling on Non-Discrimination Issue  By Tom White, on March 10th, 2010, at 4:01 pm Bearing Drift has the statement from Governor [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Gov. Bolling on Non-Discrimination Issue  By Tom White, on March 10th, 2010, at 4:01 pm Bearing Drift has the statement from Governor [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Kenney</title>
		<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2010/03/10/governor-issues-executive-directive-on-discrimination/#comment-30307</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Kenney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 20:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearingdrift.com/?p=11886#comment-30307</guid>
		<description>DC - rest of the sentence - &quot;or discrimination against any class of persons without a rational basis is prohibited&quot; - so everyone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DC &#8211; rest of the sentence &#8211; &#8220;or discrimination against any class of persons without a rational basis is prohibited&#8221; &#8211; so everyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dc</title>
		<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2010/03/10/governor-issues-executive-directive-on-discrimination/#comment-30306</link>
		<dc:creator>dc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 20:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearingdrift.com/?p=11886#comment-30306</guid>
		<description>&quot;against certain enumerated classes of persons.&quot; - so, not everyone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;against certain enumerated classes of persons.&#8221; &#8211; so, not everyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

