Biggest mistake the GOP could make
It would rank right up there with picking Gerald Ford over Ronald Reagan.
A great post by Agricola on this blog couldn’t be more wrong, as it calls for a return of Virgil Goode to the 5th Congressional race. “I encourage you to check out the new 2010 model Virgil Goode Cutlass Sedan XL version.”
But ya need liability insurance.
I have nothing against Goode, but the Republican Party has some silly contradictions in it. One of them is that we are the party of term limits, but we rally around our elected officials like they’re magicians, even after they’ve been defeated. Folks, if our talent roster is so thin that we need reruns in prime time, we’re in trouble.
If we wanted to guarantee getting crushed in 2012, we can repeat 1996 and make Obama into a Clintonesque two-termer. 1994 was a year of political revolution and we nominated Bob Dole who first became Senator when Nixon was first elected President. Oooooo. Clinton must’ve laughed all the way to Monica’s thong.
All signs point to a very good 2010 for the GOP. But if all they do is hand applications to the Republicans who got recent pink slips, we lose a very huge part of our Party: the reform movement.
I adore people like Newt Gingrich, George Allen and others who carried the banner in elected office through the tough times. If the cyclical wave comes our way, the worst thing we could do is take it as a mandate for politics as usual with the same ol’ faces and voices that once held the pedestal.
If we believe in the value of term limits, it’s that all of our hopes and dreams aren’t vested in one remarkable person. It’s the ideas that matter, and there are countless talented people who could put those ideas into action.
We shouldn’t be creating a political class of power brokers who stay on the stage for one too many encores.
If we’re going to be the Party that offers Real Change, we can’t have the voters look at our candidates saying “You again?”
If all we do in 2010 is run a “See I told ya so” tour of former elected officials taking one more bite of the apple, we’re doomed in 2012. Politics isn’t a WayBack machine. Move forward, guys!
Category: Campaigns and Elections
Loading ...
that is why Robert Hurt is so great. He is young, he has a young family & he is a Washington outsider.
You’re right that Virgil would be the worst pick the 5th district GOP could make.
Brian, I entirely respect your opinion that turning to the same old guard over and over again is a problem that the GOP needs to get over. But as I watch the 5th District primary I see a divide between two sides that so far has no sign of coming together. Regardless what Kelley and Hurt’s supporters claim, Hurt does not come across as conservative and passionate enough to make a clear case against Perriello. I’ve outlined in my blog before that Hurt comes across as a “check the box” conservative, who just does enough to get an A or 100% rating by the special interest groups that affiliate with the GOP. On pushing the envelope, on going out and making a case for a conservative agenda, on innovating, he’s a dull candidate.
His 2004 vote shows the real Hurt: just another politician. In normal circumstances he just checks off the boxes to stay a Republican. In extraordinary circumstances he’s open to make a deal to funnel more money into his district in exchange for voting for the largest tax increase in the history of Virginia. If you find the deal behind the Senate’s health care bill offensive you should be equally offended by Hurt’s 2004 vote.
I would prefer someone who was a new face but who also had a passionate drive to sell the conservative agenda. Someone like, say, State Senator Newman who had been considering a run. But he seems to have backed out. Goode would be the only plausible candidate who could appeal to those that want the GOP to get its groove back and those who want someone with the political connections that Hurt claims to have with the backing of the NRCC. He’s not a new face, but he could keep the seat warm until redistricting sets things up in 2012.
You do realize, NAS, that Steve Newman is the consumate professional politician? He’s been a poltician since he was 23 years old and elected to Lynchburg City Council. He then went to the House and to the Senate. He’s never held a real job that wasn’t based on being in the legislature (he’s worked as a lobbyist). That’s your “outsider?”
Brian, what about the current crop of candidates which these old political fossils support? Do endorsements and support of candidates by these losers mean that the candidates they endorse are channeling the hopes and desires of their failures? A couple of Virginia races come to mind….
[...] Anti-Goode aticle [...]
Good Post Brian. Young, fresh and new faces are what this party needs. Elected the same will always give us the same results…
Seems to me Ronald Reagan would be described as being a RINO by many (dare I say most) of the Tea Party Movement members. Perhaps you can explain that Ronald Reagan only blazed the start of the trail and now you guys are furthering the progress?
While I am going back on the road early tomorrow and I can not engage in this debate much longer, I think it would be fairly easy to point out things Ronald Reagan supported that would have led to any town hall meeting he dared to hold in the present atmosphere being swamped by today’s Tea Party community activists. I do not think the Tea Party members would have been singing his praises while they demonstrated.
It is fascinating and strange to watch the latest incarnation of Virgil Goode as he pokes his head out of involuntary retirement.
Fascinating and strange because no one seems to remember the history of Mr. Goode or to pay much attention to the fluidity with which he has espoused varying and widely disparate political ideologies over the years, often adopting one ideology that reflected the mood of the electorate at one time but abandoning it with the winds of change.
It’s doubtful, for example, that many realize that Goode ran for his first elective office in 1973 as a supporter of the gubernatorial campaign of the Virginia liberal firebrand Lieutenant Governor Henry E. Howell. Howell has the distinction of being the most liberal individual ever to be a credible candidate for Virginia’s governorship. In 1973, both Howell and Goode ran for office as independents, apparently because they viewed the Democratic Party of Virginia as too conservative even though it had been taken over the year before by the McGovern wing of the national party. Goode, echoing Howell’s attacks on public utilities and the conservative establishment and pledging support for the Equal Rights Amendment won. Howell lost, though with 49.7% of the vote, to one of the architects of Virginia’s conservative establishment, former Governor Mills E. Godwin.
As a member of the Virginia Senate, Goode did join the Democratic Caucus though he was well known to be one of its most liberal members and was closely identified with a small liberal faction that included Senators Joe Fitzpatrick of Norfolk (Howell’s alter ego and chief political strategist), Adelard Brault and Joe Gartlan from Northern Virginia and L. Douglas Wilder of Richmond (the Senate’s first African American member since reconstruction).
Interestingly, within a few years Goode broke his pledge to support the E.R.A. after polling data showed it to be unpopular in his district and, in one instance, hid rather than cast a vote either for or against ratification.
Throughout most of the seventies and eighties Goode remained a fairly consistent member of the liberal bloc, helping organize the “coup” that installed the liberal Adelard Brault as Democratic leader, supporting the election and reelection of President Jimmy Carter, and developing a particularly close relationship with Doug Wilder. Indeed when Wilder ran for Lt. Governor in 1985, Goode placed his name in nomination with a blisteringly, race-based appeal that savaged the then elderly Godwin as the “overseer of Chuckatuck”. Given the historical record of the frequent cruelty of plantation overseers, Goode was essentially branding Godwin not only a racist but one of the most vile and violent types of racists.
During his time in the State Senate, Goode also twice sought the Democratic nomination for the United States Senate (first as a standard bearer for the liberal wing, second as a more conservative alternative) but was roundly defeated in both efforts. Some suggest that Goode’s anger at not receiving the level of support to which he thought he was entitled mark the beginning of his rift with the Democratic Party.
In his successful 1996 campaign for Congress, Goode ran as a fairly traditional moderate southern Democratic. In speeches and television ads, he stressed the need to protect and defend Medicare and Social Security (presumably from the likes of then-Speaker Newt Gingrich) as well as the need for a balanced federal budget. Another issue which provided a clear contrast between Goode and his very conservative Republican opponent that year was Goode’s unalterable, at the time, opposition to the use of taxpayer money to fund private academies. This more liberal position certainly had more resonance with an important part of the electorate as the Congressional district included Prince Edward County which infamously closed its public schools and established a private academy in an attempt to nullify the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. Board of Education.
Upon his arrival in Washington, Goode, having served on the Virginia Senate’s Finance Committee, was apparently miffed that he was not appointed to the powerful House Appropriations Committee as a freshman. Most close observers, however, identify the Republican takeover of both houses of the Virginia legislature as the motivating factor in Goode’s move to the Republican conference. As Republicans would be drawing the lines of Congressional districts and Goode’s home county was in a geographically precarious location, one individual who served with Goode in the legislature said, “I knew he was going to switch and that he’d switch before reapportionment. I just wondered how he was going to maneuver to make it happen.”
As a Republican, Goode’s strange ideological wanderings continued. Traditionally, most of Virginia’s Republican Congressmen for the last 40 years (i.e. Caldwell Butler, Stan Parris, Herb Bateman, Tom Bliley, Frank Wolfe) have been quite conservative but within the mainstream of the conservative movement and their fellow House colleagues. Rather than embrace this tradition, Goode affiliated himself with a small faction of House Republicans including such individuals as Ron Paul, Tom Tancredo, B-1 Bob Dornan, Roscoe P. Bartlett and Randy “Duke” Cunningham – a group more known for making “colorful” comments during morning hour speeches or to cable news shows than for legislative acumen or accomplishment.
Apparently, it was during this time that Goode developed his fixation with a “close the borders” immigration policy, construction of the Great Wall of Mexico, and strong distaste for, and fear of, persons of the Islamic faith – legislative priorities that apparently a majority of his economically challenged district did not find especially relevant to their everyday lives in November of 2008. Indeed, when Goode left Congress after serving for 12 years, he did so without a single, notable legislative achievement to his name.
And so, Mr. Goode emerges (?) from retirement having traveled a long way from his days as a Henry Howell independent, his heated rhetoric branding one of Virginia’s most honorable and honored conservative Governors as a racist and even his first congressional campaign.
What a long strange trip it’s been.
Newt Gingrich is no longer worthy. He is a legend in his own mind and that ego is debilitating to the cause of restoring America.
Brian, I could not agree more. Goode had his run and should be thanked for his service to the Commonwealth and the 5th District. The idea of him running again, however, would be a HUGE mistake. We absolutely need fresh faces and fresh blood in 2010.
No matter who the nominee is in the 5th, Republicans in that District need to unite behind him or her and ensure that Perriello is NOT re-elected. Then you can hash out your differences after the election.
“No matter who the nominee is in the 5th, Republicans in that District need to unite behind him or her and ensure that Perriello is NOT re-elected. Then you can hash out your differences after the election.”
This is sick and entirely wrong, and hints of the disaster that was McCain vs. Obama (and resulted in the election Obama). I’m a Libertarian and independent voter and I would relish the return of Virgil Goode into the race, whether as a R or an I. While we may disagree on some social issues, or really the way they should be handled, I think he’s a fair and true Constitutional conservative who has shown multiple times that he does not robotically follow GOP party lines. THAT is the type of candidate I’m looking for, and Hurt and Newman are exactly those type of politicians, and have proved themselves on the state level to be as such.