<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stuck with the health care bill forever?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bearingdrift.com/2009/12/23/stuck-with-the-health-care-bill-forever/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2009/12/23/stuck-with-the-health-care-bill-forever/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 21:42:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2009/12/23/stuck-with-the-health-care-bill-forever/#comment-24478</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 14:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearingdrift.com/?p=10506#comment-24478</guid>
		<description>Is it constitutional to tar and feather a member of the Senate, especially Harry Reid?
Wait; The constitution, I doubt he has ever read it! So let me rephase my question:Is it constitutional to tar and feather a member of the Senate, especially Harry Reid, if he/she has never read it or ever given it any consideration?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it constitutional to tar and feather a member of the Senate, especially Harry Reid?<br />
Wait; The constitution, I doubt he has ever read it! So let me rephase my question:Is it constitutional to tar and feather a member of the Senate, especially Harry Reid, if he/she has never read it or ever given it any consideration?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Martin</title>
		<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2009/12/23/stuck-with-the-health-care-bill-forever/#comment-24448</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 18:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearingdrift.com/?p=10506#comment-24448</guid>
		<description>So which of the 60 Democrat Senators will stand on the Constitution and switch his or her vote to derail this travesty?




Anybody?




Warner?




Webb?




Franken?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So which of the 60 Democrat Senators will stand on the Constitution and switch his or her vote to derail this travesty?</p>
<p>Anybody?</p>
<p>Warner?</p>
<p>Webb?</p>
<p>Franken?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Riley</title>
		<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2009/12/23/stuck-with-the-health-care-bill-forever/#comment-24444</link>
		<dc:creator>Riley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 17:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearingdrift.com/?p=10506#comment-24444</guid>
		<description>As I recall from Constitutional Law class, one Congress cannot bind the actions of future congresses.  This clause is blatantly unconstitutional.

Here&#039;s a good post about it citing a law review article.

http://www.theopenhouseproject.com/2009/12/22/can-one-congress-bind-another/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I recall from Constitutional Law class, one Congress cannot bind the actions of future congresses.  This clause is blatantly unconstitutional.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a good post about it citing a law review article.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.theopenhouseproject.com/2009/12/22/can-one-congress-bind-another/" rel="nofollow">http://www.theopenhouseproject.com/2009/12/22/can-one-congress-bind-another/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

