Now the press is “boring us with poorly written fiction” apparently, wake up! McWaters is an oportunistic “Republican” and thinks he can buy this race, and a chauvinistic bum to boot. We’ve all been saying the same thing from day one. Now when will the true Republicans stand up?

I didn’t even mention how unversed on transportation he is. Good work Jeff, I pity this district if you win this thing.

The only people disputing McWater’s stance on health care are the McWaters campaign.

Saul, you mention only men that are in power. Not the fact that a woman is running against McWaters,a man who has stated his opposition to women being in power elsewhere.

By Brian’s own assertion, then Bob McDonnell is disqualified from being governor because of the Catholic church’s position on women in leadership and Mitt Romney is disqualified from being president because of the Mormon church’s similar position.

If the piece was so negative, McWaters wasn’t very smart in repeating what it said in his remarks and confirming it.

That my friends screams hypocrite!

You clearly misunderstood what I was saying. I was referring to what J.R. wrote about McWater’s church’s position on male elders possibly being brought into question. I said whoever wants to argue that:

“this is not an inherited interpretation from a long-standing church; it is a “modern” scriptural interpretation that relegates women in the 21st century, despite no precedent to do so.”

My point is that male eldership is a commonly held view in evangelical churches and has lots of historical and modern precedent. Whoever wants to make a fuss about it will probably not get far and be met with vocal opposition. I wasn’t saying anything about Rosemary…you did. This is has nothing to do with women in politics, it’s about a church’s view on women in church leadership. Totally different.