Comments on: Norfolk to double referendom signature requirements http://bearingdrift.com/2009/11/16/norfolk-to-double-referendom-signature-requirements/ Mon, 13 Feb 2012 13:18:34 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Jason Sadler http://bearingdrift.com/2009/11/16/norfolk-to-double-referendom-signature-requirements/#comment-22850 Jason Sadler Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:11:55 +0000 http://bearingdrift.com/?p=10041#comment-22850 Why bother increasing it? We had a ref in VB on light rail and shot it down. CitCounc went through with it anyway, paying over double per mile for NS ROW than Norfolk did. Break out the rainy day fund... Why bother increasing it?

We had a ref in VB on light rail and shot it down. CitCounc went through with it anyway, paying over double per mile for NS ROW than Norfolk did. Break out the rainy day fund…

]]> By: NORFOLK ALERT: Proposed charter changes « VIVIAN J. PAIGE | All Politics is Local http://bearingdrift.com/2009/11/16/norfolk-to-double-referendom-signature-requirements/#comment-22684 NORFOLK ALERT: Proposed charter changes « VIVIAN J. PAIGE | All Politics is Local Mon, 16 Nov 2009 19:07:50 +0000 http://bearingdrift.com/?p=10041#comment-22684 [...] Brian over at Bearing Drift points out that requiring 8,000 signatures is almost as many votes as were cast in the last [...] [...] Brian over at Bearing Drift points out that requiring 8,000 signatures is almost as many votes as were cast in the last [...]

]]>