Perriello, Wolf and Nye looking towards 72-hour notification
By | Wednesday, October 7th, 2009 | Policy

U.S. Representatives Glenn Nye, Tom Perriello, and Frank Wolf of Virginia all would like Speaker Nancy Pelosi to give them and the American people a little more time to “read the bill”. But they are taking different approaches in support of H.Res.554, the only vehicle right now that would get them there.

Wolf signed a “discharge petition” last month that attempted to force a vote on H. Res. 554.

H.Res. 554 would amend the rules of the House to require that all non-emergency legislation be posted on the Internet in its final form for three days before a vote.

“Members of Congress and the American people should have ample time to review legislation before it is brought to the House floor for a vote,” Wolf said. “This legislation would bring much-needed accountability and transparency to our government.

“It was frustrating back in June when the House Rules Committee reported the final rule to consider the ‘cap-and-trade’ energy bill with 300 new pages added in the ‘manager’s amendment’ at 3:47 a.m. on the day the bill was to be considered,” Wolf continued. “It was irresponsible for the House leadership to give members so little time to read the bill.”

The discharge petition still doesn’t have the required number of signatures to bring the resolution to the floor, partly because Rep. Nye and Perriello haven’t signed it, they did, however, sign a letter on Monday in support of the resolution.

The letter emphasizes the importance of bringing “ordinary Americans back into the public debate over important issues” and specifically says:

“Rep. Brian Baird has put forward a proposal, H.Res. 554, which would prohibit the House from considering legislation that has not been made public available, via the Internet, to members of Congress and the general public for at least 72 hours.

“We strongly agree with the intent of this proposal.”

Nye also added in a press release that “it’s essential that everyone has the time to read and understand legislation before it comes to a vote.”

But Nye’s office acknowledges that he has not signed the discharge petition. And, while they state that the congressman “is continuing to make the point to House leaders that he feels strongly about giving the public time to read and understand legislation before a vote”, the reality is that only the discharge petition will get the legislation out of committee.

H.Res. 554 is co-sponsored by Wolf, and also by Congressmen Randy Forbes, Rob Wittman, and Bob Goodlatte. Wolf also co-sponsored H.Res. 721, which would have placed bills on-line 30 days in advance of a vote (it’s still sitting in the Rules committee).


Tags:

Contribute for Conservatism!

Share this post

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed
  • Share this post on Delicious
  • StumbleUpon this post
  • Share this post on Digg
  • Tweet about this post
  • Share this post on Mixx
  • Share this post on Technorati
  • Share this post on Facebook
  • Share this post on NewsVine
  • Share this post on Reddit
  • Share this post on Google
  • Share this post on LinkedIn

About the author

JR Hoeft

Conservative to the core; liberal with his opinion! J.R. has been involved in politics for over a decade and has worked on several campaigns in Hampton Roads. He has served on the Executive Committee of the Republican Party of Chesapeake and the Central Committee of the Republican Party of Virginia. He is also the director of “Blogs United” in Virginia. E-mail J.R.. Follow J.R. on Twitter.

Comments

One Response to "Perriello, Wolf and Nye looking towards 72-hour notification"
  1. Bill October 7, 2009 15:34 pm

    If Perriello was serious about allowing enough time to view important bills like the health care legislation he would sign the discharge petition for HR 554. He hasn’t signed it and he is not serious about his wish for transparency. Nancy has already donated $4000 to his campaign committee this year and the DNC has donated over $30,000. You will not see Perriello sign this petition before the Health Care Bill comes to the floor. The Democrats want as few eyes as possible seeing this bill for as short of time as possible.

Leave your response

The comments section is for meaningful discussion. Readers are reminded to post comments that are germane to the article and write in a common language that steers clear of personal attacks and/or vulgarities.

Please take a moment to review our comment policy.