<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Deeds camp sending mixed messages</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bearingdrift.com/2009/09/16/deeds-camp-sending-mixed-messages/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2009/09/16/deeds-camp-sending-mixed-messages/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 04:30:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deeds New Ad Makes Mark Warner a Liar, Quickly Takes it Down &#124; Bearing Drift :: Virginia Politics On-Demand</title>
		<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2009/09/16/deeds-camp-sending-mixed-messages/#comment-21209</link>
		<dc:creator>Deeds New Ad Makes Mark Warner a Liar, Quickly Takes it Down &#124; Bearing Drift :: Virginia Politics On-Demand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 04:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearingdrift.com/?p=8664#comment-21209</guid>
		<description>[...] Keep in mind this was a script assuredly written by Deeds campaign, the same team that helped pen Deeds&#8217; infamous &#8216;I will raise taxes&#8217; op-ed in the Washington Post and the same team that promised the FOP one thing and the Virginia Sheriff&#8217;s Association another. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Keep in mind this was a script assuredly written by Deeds campaign, the same team that helped pen Deeds&#8217; infamous &#8216;I will raise taxes&#8217; op-ed in the Washington Post and the same team that promised the FOP one thing and the Virginia Sheriff&#8217;s Association another. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I know you think you understood what Deeds said, but what you heard was not what he meant</title>
		<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2009/09/16/deeds-camp-sending-mixed-messages/#comment-20989</link>
		<dc:creator>I know you think you understood what Deeds said, but what you heard was not what he meant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 03:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearingdrift.com/?p=8664#comment-20989</guid>
		<description>[...] a stop over to Bearing Drift: Deeds camp sending mixed messages Can Virginians trust what Creigh Deeds is telling them [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a stop over to Bearing Drift: Deeds camp sending mixed messages Can Virginians trust what Creigh Deeds is telling them [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D.J. McGuire</title>
		<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2009/09/16/deeds-camp-sending-mixed-messages/#comment-20975</link>
		<dc:creator>D.J. McGuire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearingdrift.com/?p=8664#comment-20975</guid>
		<description>So according to the Dems, we can ignore what Deeds said roughly one month ago, but not what McDonnell wrote 244 months ago?

Anyone else confused?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So according to the Dems, we can ignore what Deeds said roughly one month ago, but not what McDonnell wrote 244 months ago?</p>
<p>Anyone else confused?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Let me get this straight &#171; The right-wing liberal</title>
		<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2009/09/16/deeds-camp-sending-mixed-messages/#comment-20973</link>
		<dc:creator>Let me get this straight &#171; The right-wing liberal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearingdrift.com/?p=8664#comment-20973</guid>
		<description>[...] but what Creigh Deeds wrote and said less than two months ago can be completely ignored (Washington Post via J.R. Hoeft at BD). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] but what Creigh Deeds wrote and said less than two months ago can be completely ignored (Washington Post via J.R. Hoeft at BD). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

