However, you miss a HUGE point. By not having time to react and adapt, the decison, those drug lords and DUIs can potentially get away with distributing dangerous drugs and recklessly endanger the public.

Yes, it is the duty of the court to protect the idea of “innocent until proved guilty”. That doesn’t mean that there isn’t huge and potentially expensive work to do in order to legally be able to protect the public from those that ARE guilty.

Your dismissive attitude regarding Cuccinelli’s logical request for a speedy solution is disturbing. Then again, this isn’t really about justice with you is it? I bet its politcs.

“Isn’t that cooch’s true agenda. Only stinky rich should have full access to due process, the rest are guilty as accused …….move along.” – John

John, you are either ignorant of Cuccinelli’s career of protecting individual rights or you are just again throwing out BS out of political motivation.

Sen. Cuccinelli sponsored the Senate side of very important Eminent Domain legislation. That protects the little guy more than the huge big government power mongers that you likely support.

For somebody who thinks Ken wants to “control” the “average Joe”, you must be confused by Ken Cuccinelli’s continual defense of “Joe Average’s” right to keep and bear arms.

The rule of law defends the little guy against drug lords and DUI offenders too, John. It isn’t just the filthy rich that are killed by them.

This positon that we are in is very grave. Innocent people’s lives are in jeopardy until a remedy is put in place. You should be encouraging your legislators to put this on the front burner rather than invite delay and disaster because you fear that an opponent will politically benefit.