<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NRCC launches Nye &#8220;Waffles&#8221; ad</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bearingdrift.com/2009/07/10/nrcc-launches-nye-waffles-ad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2009/07/10/nrcc-launches-nye-waffles-ad/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 06:27:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Kirwin</title>
		<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2009/07/10/nrcc-launches-nye-waffles-ad/#comment-19171</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Kirwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 19:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearingdrift.com/?p=7500#comment-19171</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t latch onto something without proof.  You just didn&#039;t believe me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t latch onto something without proof.  You just didn&#8217;t believe me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LittleDavid</title>
		<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2009/07/10/nrcc-launches-nye-waffles-ad/#comment-19170</link>
		<dc:creator>LittleDavid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 18:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearingdrift.com/?p=7500#comment-19170</guid>
		<description>Brian,

I&#039;m an idiot?

You&#039;re the guy who latched on to something without proof.

I understand that it took you some time to finally getting around to proving it.

Now, with the proof, I am willing to accept things.

But I am going to resort to name calling just like you did.  Brian Kirwin is a pretty intelligent and informed guy who is not always perfect.  Now, take that!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m an idiot?</p>
<p>You&#8217;re the guy who latched on to something without proof.</p>
<p>I understand that it took you some time to finally getting around to proving it.</p>
<p>Now, with the proof, I am willing to accept things.</p>
<p>But I am going to resort to name calling just like you did.  Brian Kirwin is a pretty intelligent and informed guy who is not always perfect.  Now, take that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Kirwin</title>
		<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2009/07/10/nrcc-launches-nye-waffles-ad/#comment-19168</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Kirwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearingdrift.com/?p=7500#comment-19168</guid>
		<description>David, you&#039;re an idiot.

It can accurately be said that the NRCC took up the issue Wednesday morning at 7:33 am when they sent out a press release about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David, you&#8217;re an idiot.</p>
<p>It can accurately be said that the NRCC took up the issue Wednesday morning at 7:33 am when they sent out a press release about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LittleDavid</title>
		<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2009/07/10/nrcc-launches-nye-waffles-ad/#comment-19165</link>
		<dc:creator>LittleDavid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearingdrift.com/?p=7500#comment-19165</guid>
		<description>When I said the NRCC hadn&#039;t yet taken up the issue, I also indicated &quot;yet&quot;.  It does not surprise me that they at least have come up with a You Tube piece and made a statement.  Now it can accurately said that the NRCC has taken up the issue.

By the way, the same recipient of the previously mentioned two contradicting 
replies has now also received a third.  This reply is much more moderate in tone and explains in some detail why Glenn voted against it.  I am not certain whether the third reply was in response to the hoopla or because as a matter of course his staff tries to provide a response to every constituent communication they receive.  The recipient wrote several Emails to Glenn on the same subject.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I said the NRCC hadn&#8217;t yet taken up the issue, I also indicated &#8220;yet&#8221;.  It does not surprise me that they at least have come up with a You Tube piece and made a statement.  Now it can accurately said that the NRCC has taken up the issue.</p>
<p>By the way, the same recipient of the previously mentioned two contradicting<br />
replies has now also received a third.  This reply is much more moderate in tone and explains in some detail why Glenn voted against it.  I am not certain whether the third reply was in response to the hoopla or because as a matter of course his staff tries to provide a response to every constituent communication they receive.  The recipient wrote several Emails to Glenn on the same subject.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HoodaThunk?: Nye&#8217;s Waffle House</title>
		<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2009/07/10/nrcc-launches-nye-waffles-ad/#comment-19164</link>
		<dc:creator>HoodaThunk?: Nye&#8217;s Waffle House</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearingdrift.com/?p=7500#comment-19164</guid>
		<description>[...] (Hat tip: Bearing Drift) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (Hat tip: Bearing Drift) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

