<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FTC seeks to regulate blogs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bearingdrift.com/2009/06/25/ftc-seeks-to-regulate-blogs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2009/06/25/ftc-seeks-to-regulate-blogs/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 06:14:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Letter to the Enemies of the Constitution, Our Dear Politicians &#124; RantNation</title>
		<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2009/06/25/ftc-seeks-to-regulate-blogs/#comment-19237</link>
		<dc:creator>A Letter to the Enemies of the Constitution, Our Dear Politicians &#124; RantNation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 02:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearingdrift.com/?p=7290#comment-19237</guid>
		<description>[...] now taking aim at Freedom of Speech in some very frightening ways, and I don&#8217;t suspect that blogs as we know them will be around many more years anyway. Go ahead, call me paranoid. I don&#8217;t care. I&#8217;m [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] now taking aim at Freedom of Speech in some very frightening ways, and I don&#8217;t suspect that blogs as we know them will be around many more years anyway. Go ahead, call me paranoid. I don&#8217;t care. I&#8217;m [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Kopko</title>
		<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2009/06/25/ftc-seeks-to-regulate-blogs/#comment-19095</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Kopko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 23:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearingdrift.com/?p=7290#comment-19095</guid>
		<description>Virginia law simply requires transparency of political money: &quot;CHAPTER 2 – Statement of Organization; Section 2.1 - Becoming a PAC. 
Any person, association, organization or group of individuals that anticipates receiving contributions and/or spending funds in excess of $200 in order to influence the outcome of any non-federal election in Virginia must register as a political committee with the SBE.&quot;  

There are many blogs owners specifically seeking to influence elections who certainly receive and/or spend $200+ dollars in doing so even before the advertising revenue.  Say whatever you want, I&#039;d just like the money trail to always be transparent.

I don&#039;t see where the FTC comes into play; seems like FEC and state Board of Elections issues just like all other politics-influencing entities deal with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Virginia law simply requires transparency of political money: &#8220;CHAPTER 2 – Statement of Organization; Section 2.1 &#8211; Becoming a PAC.<br />
Any person, association, organization or group of individuals that anticipates receiving contributions and/or spending funds in excess of $200 in order to influence the outcome of any non-federal election in Virginia must register as a political committee with the SBE.&#8221;  </p>
<p>There are many blogs owners specifically seeking to influence elections who certainly receive and/or spend $200+ dollars in doing so even before the advertising revenue.  Say whatever you want, I&#8217;d just like the money trail to always be transparent.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see where the FTC comes into play; seems like FEC and state Board of Elections issues just like all other politics-influencing entities deal with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Narrow vs broad: blogging and the FTC &#171; VIVIAN J. PAIGE &#124; All Politics is Local</title>
		<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2009/06/25/ftc-seeks-to-regulate-blogs/#comment-18910</link>
		<dc:creator>Narrow vs broad: blogging and the FTC &#171; VIVIAN J. PAIGE &#124; All Politics is Local</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 16:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearingdrift.com/?p=7290#comment-18910</guid>
		<description>[...] by J.R. Hoeft of Bearing Drift and yours truly. Hoeft posted his (unedited) op-ed on his blog last week, while mine (as printed in the paper)  is below the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] by J.R. Hoeft of Bearing Drift and yours truly. Hoeft posted his (unedited) op-ed on his blog last week, while mine (as printed in the paper)  is below the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Freedom Fighter</title>
		<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2009/06/25/ftc-seeks-to-regulate-blogs/#comment-18872</link>
		<dc:creator>Freedom Fighter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 17:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearingdrift.com/?p=7290#comment-18872</guid>
		<description>The blagosphere is destroying mainstream media i.e. TV and newspaper, which are for the majority left centers of news. Therefore they are going to try to destroy the blogosphere. Once the FTC is allowed in the door there will be less and less freedom for bloggers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The blagosphere is destroying mainstream media i.e. TV and newspaper, which are for the majority left centers of news. Therefore they are going to try to destroy the blogosphere. Once the FTC is allowed in the door there will be less and less freedom for bloggers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Osborne</title>
		<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2009/06/25/ftc-seeks-to-regulate-blogs/#comment-18855</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Osborne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 21:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearingdrift.com/?p=7290#comment-18855</guid>
		<description>This action by the FTC is messed up. The blogosphere can really be looked at from a legal standpoint in the same manner as a soapbox in a public park. As long as there is nothing truly illegal involved, the FTC needs to stay out!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This action by the FTC is messed up. The blogosphere can really be looked at from a legal standpoint in the same manner as a soapbox in a public park. As long as there is nothing truly illegal involved, the FTC needs to stay out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

