<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Democrats grab more power in Congress</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bearingdrift.com/2009/06/16/democrats-grab-more-power-in-congress/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2009/06/16/democrats-grab-more-power-in-congress/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 07:01:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: aznew</title>
		<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2009/06/16/democrats-grab-more-power-in-congress/#comment-18709</link>
		<dc:creator>aznew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 10:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearingdrift.com/2009/06/16/democrats-grab-more-power-in-congress/#comment-18709</guid>
		<description>J.R. @ June 17 10:19 a.m.

Here is an excellent article from the Boston Globe regarding how the House ran under the GOP:

http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2004/10/03/back_room_dealing_a_capitol_trend?pg=full

No clean hands, here. Some of the bills discussed in this article were appropriations bills.

Is it right? IMHO, a healthy democracy would find a way for legitimate amendments to be introduced and debated, while excluding those interposed to make a rhetorical or political point of to waste time. People smarter than me, however, have not figured out how to do that, and probably never will as long as people on both sides of the aisle continue act in bad faith, but that&#039;s politics, I guess.

But I&#039;m not sure how the GOP can complain about poor treatment in light of stuff like this from when they were in charge:

&quot;The ... episode is emblematic of the way business is conducted in the 108th Congress, where a Republican leadership has sidelined legislation unwanted by the Bush administration, even when a majority of the House seemed ready to approve it, according to lawmakers, lobbyists, and an analysis of House activities.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>J.R. @ June 17 10:19 a.m.</p>
<p>Here is an excellent article from the Boston Globe regarding how the House ran under the GOP:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2004/10/03/back_room_dealing_a_capitol_trend?pg=full" rel="nofollow">http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2004/10/03/back_room_dealing_a_capitol_trend?pg=full</a></p>
<p>No clean hands, here. Some of the bills discussed in this article were appropriations bills.</p>
<p>Is it right? IMHO, a healthy democracy would find a way for legitimate amendments to be introduced and debated, while excluding those interposed to make a rhetorical or political point of to waste time. People smarter than me, however, have not figured out how to do that, and probably never will as long as people on both sides of the aisle continue act in bad faith, but that&#8217;s politics, I guess.</p>
<p>But I&#8217;m not sure how the GOP can complain about poor treatment in light of stuff like this from when they were in charge:</p>
<p>&#8220;The &#8230; episode is emblematic of the way business is conducted in the 108th Congress, where a Republican leadership has sidelined legislation unwanted by the Bush administration, even when a majority of the House seemed ready to approve it, according to lawmakers, lobbyists, and an analysis of House activities.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Vaughan</title>
		<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2009/06/16/democrats-grab-more-power-in-congress/#comment-18679</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Vaughan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 14:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearingdrift.com/2009/06/16/democrats-grab-more-power-in-congress/#comment-18679</guid>
		<description>Brian: You&#039;re spot on here. In a legislative body, the majority makes the rules. The minority holds a press conference and raises a stink. If you have a united majority, limiting the minority amendments is just a way to keep from wasting time by voting them down one by one. In the General Assembly, both Democratic House Speaker Tom Moss and his Republican succesor Vance Wilkins had designated delegates that they would call on to &quot;call the pending question&quot; to end debate when it  began to drag on and on. That motion nearly always carried.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian: You&#8217;re spot on here. In a legislative body, the majority makes the rules. The minority holds a press conference and raises a stink. If you have a united majority, limiting the minority amendments is just a way to keep from wasting time by voting them down one by one. In the General Assembly, both Democratic House Speaker Tom Moss and his Republican succesor Vance Wilkins had designated delegates that they would call on to &#8220;call the pending question&#8221; to end debate when it  began to drag on and on. That motion nearly always carried.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2009/06/16/democrats-grab-more-power-in-congress/#comment-18661</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearingdrift.com/2009/06/16/democrats-grab-more-power-in-congress/#comment-18661</guid>
		<description>This seems like the kind of behavior you complain about when the other side engages in it.  I don&#039;t know about spending bills in particular, but a Roll Call article from May 2007 (!) says the Dems shut out Repub amendments 43% of the time compared to 32% by the Repubs when they had the majority.  I&#039;m having a hard time working up much outrage here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This seems like the kind of behavior you complain about when the other side engages in it.  I don&#8217;t know about spending bills in particular, but a Roll Call article from May 2007 (!) says the Dems shut out Repub amendments 43% of the time compared to 32% by the Repubs when they had the majority.  I&#8217;m having a hard time working up much outrage here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.R. Hoeft</title>
		<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2009/06/16/democrats-grab-more-power-in-congress/#comment-18659</link>
		<dc:creator>J.R. Hoeft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 14:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearingdrift.com/2009/06/16/democrats-grab-more-power-in-congress/#comment-18659</guid>
		<description>Shane,
I can&#039;t recall anytime that the GOP did not allow the Democrats to offer amendments on spending bills and I challenge you to prove your point with facts.  Regardless, your point about offering up alternatives is the right one...and those alternatives are all over the place.  Just because we&#039;re not writing about it here doesn&#039;t mean they don&#039;t exist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shane,<br />
I can&#8217;t recall anytime that the GOP did not allow the Democrats to offer amendments on spending bills and I challenge you to prove your point with facts.  Regardless, your point about offering up alternatives is the right one&#8230;and those alternatives are all over the place.  Just because we&#8217;re not writing about it here doesn&#8217;t mean they don&#8217;t exist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Osborne</title>
		<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2009/06/16/democrats-grab-more-power-in-congress/#comment-18658</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Osborne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearingdrift.com/2009/06/16/democrats-grab-more-power-in-congress/#comment-18658</guid>
		<description>Shane,

Thats just it, the Republicans are putting out positions and ideas. The problem is that those ideas are not getting the kind of public airing that they deserve.

Also, it seems to me that the Democratic minority had a powerful dissenting voice and used it quite often. Hence why they were able to kill social security reform.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shane,</p>
<p>Thats just it, the Republicans are putting out positions and ideas. The problem is that those ideas are not getting the kind of public airing that they deserve.</p>
<p>Also, it seems to me that the Democratic minority had a powerful dissenting voice and used it quite often. Hence why they were able to kill social security reform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane McNulty</title>
		<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2009/06/16/democrats-grab-more-power-in-congress/#comment-18657</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane McNulty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearingdrift.com/2009/06/16/democrats-grab-more-power-in-congress/#comment-18657</guid>
		<description>And.. I&#039;m just curious, what makes this any different from 2000 - 2006 with Republican controlled Legislative and Executive branches?  Turn about is fair play gentlemen.

I&#039;m not saying it&#039;s right, cause it&#039;s not, but I understand.

If the GOP wants to turn this around they&#039;ll quit complaining about what Obama&#039;s saying or not saying (because that crap is petty), and instead use the public forum to introduce new ideas.  Where&#039;s the broad defense of the tax payer?  Where&#039;s the emphatic-to-the-point-of-boring itemization investigation into the TARP and other bailout measures?  There are things the GOP could be doing right now, today, without even being on the floor of Congress, and could start to turn things around for them.

And speaking as someone who actually likes the idea of having more than one party in power at a time... please get on with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And.. I&#8217;m just curious, what makes this any different from 2000 &#8211; 2006 with Republican controlled Legislative and Executive branches?  Turn about is fair play gentlemen.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying it&#8217;s right, cause it&#8217;s not, but I understand.</p>
<p>If the GOP wants to turn this around they&#8217;ll quit complaining about what Obama&#8217;s saying or not saying (because that crap is petty), and instead use the public forum to introduce new ideas.  Where&#8217;s the broad defense of the tax payer?  Where&#8217;s the emphatic-to-the-point-of-boring itemization investigation into the TARP and other bailout measures?  There are things the GOP could be doing right now, today, without even being on the floor of Congress, and could start to turn things around for them.</p>
<p>And speaking as someone who actually likes the idea of having more than one party in power at a time&#8230; please get on with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Osborne</title>
		<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2009/06/16/democrats-grab-more-power-in-congress/#comment-18654</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Osborne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 04:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearingdrift.com/2009/06/16/democrats-grab-more-power-in-congress/#comment-18654</guid>
		<description>The Democratic majority must shut out Republican alternatives if they are to continue to paint the GOP as the &quot;party of no.&quot; The sad part is that they are shutting out some ideas that may be good ones, in exchange for political gain. This is why the American people must vote them out of power next year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Democratic majority must shut out Republican alternatives if they are to continue to paint the GOP as the &#8220;party of no.&#8221; The sad part is that they are shutting out some ideas that may be good ones, in exchange for political gain. This is why the American people must vote them out of power next year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Kirwin</title>
		<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2009/06/16/democrats-grab-more-power-in-congress/#comment-18648</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Kirwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 02:26:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearingdrift.com/2009/06/16/democrats-grab-more-power-in-congress/#comment-18648</guid>
		<description>Sounds like the Democrats fear some Republican amendments may actually pass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like the Democrats fear some Republican amendments may actually pass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

