Comments on: Not Another Bailout http://bearingdrift.com/2009/06/07/not-another-bailout/ Sat, 26 May 2012 03:24:26 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Travesty on the Potomac: Bill “shortchanges” Troops | Bearing Drift :: Virginia Politics On-Demand http://bearingdrift.com/2009/06/07/not-another-bailout/#comment-18671 Travesty on the Potomac: Bill “shortchanges” Troops | Bearing Drift :: Virginia Politics On-Demand Thu, 18 Jun 2009 03:03:49 +0000 http://bearingdrift.com/?p=7018#comment-18671 [...] did the majority feel the need to squelch debate last night? Remember, a little over a week ago, I blogged about the Democrat leadership’s difficulty with this bill. The Senate loaded up the War [...] [...] did the majority feel the need to squelch debate last night? Remember, a little over a week ago, I blogged about the Democrat leadership’s difficulty with this bill. The Senate loaded up the War [...]

]]> By: Darrell -- Chesapeake http://bearingdrift.com/2009/06/07/not-another-bailout/#comment-18394 Darrell -- Chesapeake Sun, 07 Jun 2009 16:47:13 +0000 http://bearingdrift.com/?p=7018#comment-18394 This is what happens when the nation ignores that entangling alliances thingy. The billions of dollars are our part of an international agreement. What's that? Congress didn't agree? The People didn't agree? Who cares! We as a nation signed on to all the enabling treaties and agreements giving the Executive the right to negotiate with other nations leaders for things like money. So all this garbage you are hearing from the politicians is BS. If the cash doesn't get approved through the defense bill, it will be put in others a little bit at a time until our commitment is fulfilled. It's not a R vs D deal. It's US vs THEM. http://www.cosmicfantasia.com/200906011542/alternative-media/fair-marketplace/ngos-oppose-nearly-100-billion-dollar-pledge-to-imf.php Notice this is a left wing link. Their major complaint is that the money doesn't go to them. Pay attention to what they say the final bill is. This is what happens when the nation ignores that entangling alliances thingy. The billions of dollars are our part of an international agreement. What’s that? Congress didn’t agree? The People didn’t agree? Who cares! We as a nation signed on to all the enabling treaties and agreements giving the Executive the right to negotiate with other nations leaders for things like money. So all this garbage you are hearing from the politicians is BS. If the cash doesn’t get approved through the defense bill, it will be put in others a little bit at a time until our commitment is fulfilled. It’s not a R vs D deal. It’s US vs THEM.

http://www.cosmicfantasia.com/200906011542/alternative-media/fair-marketplace/ngos-oppose-nearly-100-billion-dollar-pledge-to-imf.php

Notice this is a left wing link. Their major complaint is that the money doesn’t go to them. Pay attention to what they say the final bill is.

]]> By: Amit http://bearingdrift.com/2009/06/07/not-another-bailout/#comment-18391 Amit Sun, 07 Jun 2009 11:46:47 +0000 http://bearingdrift.com/?p=7018#comment-18391 the Republicans should have opposed this bill from the start. why should we fund our own troops through an international body? do we want our soldiers subject to international courts? do we somehow think it is more efficient to go through an inept bureaucracy? this just really reminds me that many "conservatives" just don't get it. the Republicans should have opposed this bill from the start. why should we fund our own troops through an international body? do we want our soldiers subject to international courts? do we somehow think it is more efficient to go through an inept bureaucracy? this just really reminds me that many “conservatives” just don’t get it.

]]>