Thoughts on Tienanmen Square
By JR Hoeft | Thursday, June 4th, 2009 | PolicyThis year marks the 20th Anniversary of the Tienanmen Square tragedy. That tragedy, thankfully, has brought some reform to China, but not nearly enough. D.J. McGuire, who, among other things, founded the China e-Lobby, offers up his thoughts:
“The irony here – and one we must remember – is that this year, more than any other except perhaps for 1989 itself, we can truly say that those who were murdered did not die in vain. For whatever the rest of the world thinks of the Tiananmen Square bloodbath, the Chinese Communist Party is more afraid of it than it has ever been.”
McGuiire goes onto explain in his post that the anger over Tienanmen is still simmering, if not ready to boil in the country-side. He makes the case that the Communist Party has used a series of events over the past year to distract Americans and the outside world from remembering…this year, it was allowing Kim Jong Il of North Korea to detonate a nuclear warhead.
However, McGuire thinks that freedom still can come to China, especially as surrounding nations remain anti-Communist:
“The historical symbol of bloody repression hangs everywhere. Invisible but undeniable, it reminds tens of millions of Chinese that there was, once, a different path, and makes laughable every effort by the CCP to make it go away.”
Tags:
About the author
Conservative to the core; liberal with his opinion! J.R. has been involved in politics for over a decade and has worked on several campaigns in Hampton Roads. He has served on the Executive Committee of the Republican Party of Chesapeake and the Central Committee of the Republican Party of Virginia. He is also the director of “Blogs United” in Virginia. E-mail J.R.. Follow J.R. on Twitter.







Comments
One Response to "Thoughts on Tienanmen Square"
Every year one of my reflections about Tienanmen is that it’s sad we don’t spend nearly enough much time reflecting on the Battle of Midway, which coincidentally started on this day in 1942. Food for thought.
Leave your response
The comments section is for meaningful discussion. Readers are reminded to post comments that are germane to the article and write in a common language that steers clear of personal attacks and/or vulgarities.
Please take a moment to review our comment policy.