Virginia congressmen on health care
By JR Hoeft | Friday, March 6th, 2009 | PolicyYesterday, the president held a health care forum that has been widely reported, but what do our own congressmen think about the issue?
From Rep. Eric Cantor:
“Make no mistake: Republicans want to work with the President to modernize America’s health care system and reduce waste while ensuring that patients have access to high quality, affordable care. However, the devil is always in the details and we hope that the path to achieving this goal does not start and end in the basement of Health and Human Services or some new government agency.
“Instead any new proposals should focus on helping the single mother who is driving to an office building in Richmond and worrying about her family’s financial situation, her job security and their health care coverage. We must ensure she can choose any doctor she wants and that that doctor is free to decide which treatment options are best for her family without some government board second guessing the decision. It also means preserving access to that care even if she changes or loses her job.
From Rep. Randy Forbes:
“Stories of poor care under government-run systems show us that the answer is not to dramatically shift our system away from a patient-centered system. Yet, just last week a number of concerning health provisions that will put our country on the path towards government-run health care were included in the $790 billion economic stimulus package. Among those provisions was the expansion of a National Coordinator of Health Information Technology whose responsibility will be to monitor doctors’ actions to ensure they are doing what the federal government decides is appropriate for health treatments. Although health provisions like this one were tucked away in the over-1000 page bill, they make a very blatant move at shifting patient-doctor decisions to bureaucrats in Washington.
“Our goal must be to seek a balance, by providing even higher quality health care at an overall lower cost. We need to protect that individual right, while expanding access to care for seniors and low-income Americans. There are a few ways Congress can do this.
“We need to increase choices for health insurance. We can do this by allowing families to purchase insurance across state lines, to carry their insurance with them regardless of change in employment or a decision by an employer, and to opt to use Health Savings Accounts. These initiatives rely on competition and individual responsibility – not government mandates and more bureaucracy – to achieve reform. Programs like Association Health Plans allow businesses to join together to offer health insurance at a much lower cost to their workers. Repairing and strengthening the health care marketplace is the best way to both preserve quality and lower costs in our health system.
“We also need to bring our health care system into the 21st century through the use of technology. Out-of-control medical malpractice lawsuits have prompted physicians to order billions of dollars in unneeded tests, straining our health care system and limiting the number of quality physicians to patients. Investing in virtual hands-on training for medical professionals and electronic charting for patients has been proven to reduce medical errors and could reduce health care costs up to $17 billion a year in the U.S. I have introduced a bill, the Enhancing SIMULATION Act (H.R. 855), which would prioritize these commonsense technology efforts in our medical system, creating an important step forward in modernizing our current health care system.”
And from Rep. Bob Goodlatte:
“I believe that any successful reform will include several key components such as health insurance tax credits for individuals and families. We must also allow individuals the option to purchase health care across state lines, helping create a national market for health insurance by having consumers, not bureaucrats, find the coverage which best suits their needs.
“Medical liability reform should also be a part of any health care overhaul. Discouraging the practice of defensive medicine, the ordering of unnecessary tests and procedures, will save billions of dollars.
“Another important piece of any health care reform package is the creation of Association Health Plans, known as AHPs. AHPs are an effective mechanism to extend coverage among the working uninsured by reducing the barriers that small employers currently face in providing coverage for their employees. AHPs are intended to increase incentives for employers to band together to purchase insurance coverage at lower rates for their employees. The way to revitalize our struggling American economy is by ensuring the stability of America’s small businesses and reducing the burden of increasing health care costs is a big part of that.
“Additionally, real health care reform must also encourage the establishment of a nationwide health information technology network, including electronic medical records and e-prescriptions. Health information technology can reduce medical errors, save time, money and most importantly, save lives.
“The most important principles in health care reform are holding down costs and preserving consumer choices. We already spend far more per person than any other country in the world. Reform must mean using the health care dollars we now spend in a smarter, more effective way. Most important of all we should be preserving and enhancing the ability of people to choose the plans that are tailored to their needs and the doctors that they trust to guide them.”
Tags:
About the author
Conservative to the core; liberal with his opinion! J.R. has been involved in politics for over a decade and has worked on several campaigns in Hampton Roads. He has served on the Executive Committee of the Republican Party of Chesapeake and the Central Committee of the Republican Party of Virginia. He is also the director of “Blogs United” in Virginia. E-mail J.R.. Follow J.R. on Twitter.







Comments
2 Responses to "Virginia congressmen on health care"
I am going to key on Cantor’s comments. For a typical female health consumer, Cantor states:
“We must ensure she can choose any doctor she wants and that that doctor is free to decide which treatment options are best for her family without some government board second guessing the decision. It also means preserving access to that care even if she changes or loses her job.”
Seems to me Cantor is talking about the sky is the limit. Society should provide the most expensive health care to each and every citizen even if the most expensive health care is proven to provide decreasing returns for the money spent. He wants to provide this to each and every citizen, even provide this if our female changes or loses her job. Loses her job? Just how expensive does he want Medicaid to get anyway?
I do not think that I am wrong to say that Cantor is talking out of both sides of his mouth. He is prescribing the most expensive option for solving our health care problem while being against any reasonable alternative to pay for this extremely expensive option. If we go for the gold, somebody has to pay for it.
Since he wants to provide gold plated health care to every citizen, perhaps he will be willing to acknowledge that those that own the gold have to give up some of it to meet the increased need for gold.
PLEASE………PLEASE………PLEASE!!!
Let’s please reconsider what is going on here! I am already VERY happy with my current health insurance, which my husband earned as part of his retirement package.
I quit smoking, lost weight, watch what I eat, & exercise on a regular basis to stay healthy. Sooooooo, my question is:
Why must I pay the medical bills of every person who smokes themselves to death, drinks themselves to death, or eats themselves to death? Likewise for Americans who insist on shooting up with herion, sniffing cocaine, or doing whatever is unhealthy. I believe it is up to EVERY individual to follow a healthy lifestyle in order to reap the rewards of NO major illnesses later in life. I also do not think I should pay ALL the medical & Dr bills for a single, non-working woman who uses NO birth control and continues to have baby after baby, even when she knows she cannot afford another!
Another point to ponder: How can we trust the US Government to manage health care when the head exectives of banks, automobile manufacturers, & etc. are NOT held accountable for billions of US tax payer money they were given? Why should we create yet ANOTHER non-working Government bureaucracy which will cost the tax payers even more money? Can we PLEASE put this issue to a vote of the registered Americans?
Leave your response
The comments section is for meaningful discussion. Readers are reminded to post comments that are germane to the article and write in a common language that steers clear of personal attacks and/or vulgarities.
Please take a moment to review our comment policy.