Forbes accepts earmark; sinks nearly $1M into swamp
By | Tuesday, March 3rd, 2009 | Policy

Under normal circumstances, most folks find Rep. Randy Forbes to be a solid conservative, but in the latest Federal Omnibus bill, Forbes is part of the GOP’s 40% problem.

As most of you know by now, there are nearly 9000 earmarks in the next omnibus bill, and 40% of them are from the GOP. This point creates an inconvenient problem for fiscal conservatives who are trying to take back their party after eight years in the wilderness under the Bush Administration.

When House Republicans voted en masse against the last federal bailout bill, which included Forbes, it looked as if the GOP was moving forward to regaining the trust of conservatives.

Then, this week’s bombshell that 40% of the earmarks on the omnibus bill belong to the GOP, caused a lot of that good will to erode, as well as the GOP’s credibility.

So what was worth earmarking in the 4th CD?

More transit? Education? Modeling and simulation?

Nope.

A cool million for the Great Dismal Swamp.

According to a Forbes release:

$898,000 for the Dismal Swamp Canal Route. The funds will be used to continue to operate low level water control structures, navigation locks, bridges, and canals and to perform critical backlog maintenance.

$59,000 for a feasibility study of the Dismal Swamp and Dismal Swamp Canal. The funding will allow the Army Corps of Engineers to conduct a study of flooding related to the Dismal Swamp Canal.

My question to the congressman: how much revenue does the City of Chesapeake and the 4th District generate per year from the boats that traverse the canal? Is it worth $1 million? How much comes back to the district for tourism?

Admittedly, this can be a tough decision, but when Republicans and conservatives are trying to send a message that this is the party to protect jobs, stimulate economic growth, and become less dependent on government, flushing fat into the brackish water of the swamp stinks.


Tags:

Contribute for Conservatism!

Share this post

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed
  • Share this post on Delicious
  • StumbleUpon this post
  • Share this post on Digg
  • Tweet about this post
  • Share this post on Mixx
  • Share this post on Technorati
  • Share this post on Facebook
  • Share this post on NewsVine
  • Share this post on Reddit
  • Share this post on Google
  • Share this post on LinkedIn

About the author

JR Hoeft

Conservative to the core; liberal with his opinion! J.R. has been involved in politics for over a decade and has worked on several campaigns in Hampton Roads. He has served on the Executive Committee of the Republican Party of Chesapeake and the Central Committee of the Republican Party of Virginia. He is also the director of “Blogs United” in Virginia. E-mail J.R.. Follow J.R. on Twitter.

Comments

One Response to "Forbes accepts earmark; sinks nearly $1M into swamp"
  1. Suzie March 8, 2009 18:03 pm

    Forbes is right on with this earmark. This is exactly what members of Congress are supposed to do. If you relied on the US Army Corps of Engineers to pick projects they think are important then all of the money would go to the Mississippi River valley and out west to break up old dams in the Pacific West. Inserting instrructions into the Corps of Engineers appropriations bill does not increase the cost of the bill by one penny – it simply includes instructions for funds they would spend in any event. Virginia is blessed and cursed with a lot of waterways and the Corps of Engineers – whether you like it or not – is responsible for keeping those waterways navigable and open for commerce. There is nothing wrong with this earmark.

    Don’t get me started on earmarks for the Cowgirl Hall of Fame though – those are inexcusable and unforgivable. Those members should be tossed out of office. Randy has the right approach.

Leave your response

Please take a moment to review our comment policy.