<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sessoms&#8217; strategist debunks &#8220;flyergate&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bearingdrift.com/2008/12/16/sessoms-strategist-debunks-flyergate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2008/12/16/sessoms-strategist-debunks-flyergate/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 07:57:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Kirwin</title>
		<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2008/12/16/sessoms-strategist-debunks-flyergate/#comment-11347</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Kirwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 11:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearingdrift.com/?p=3751#comment-11347</guid>
		<description>Easily explained.  I worked for Glenn Davis and not for Sessoms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Easily explained.  I worked for Glenn Davis and not for Sessoms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vivian J Paige</title>
		<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2008/12/16/sessoms-strategist-debunks-flyergate/#comment-11345</link>
		<dc:creator>Vivian J Paige</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 05:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearingdrift.com/?p=3751#comment-11345</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;That’s right, Vivian. Only use the information you like. Ignore information that disproves your view. Good reporting!&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Wrong again, Brian. If Sessoms and Davis are so much alike, how is it that Sessoms &lt;b&gt;lost&lt;/b&gt; in about 75% of the precincts in the city while Davis &lt;b&gt;won&lt;/b&gt; in about 90% of them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>That’s right, Vivian. Only use the information you like. Ignore information that disproves your view. Good reporting!</p></blockquote>
<p>Wrong again, Brian. If Sessoms and Davis are so much alike, how is it that Sessoms <b>lost</b> in about 75% of the precincts in the city while Davis <b>won</b> in about 90% of them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Kirwin</title>
		<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2008/12/16/sessoms-strategist-debunks-flyergate/#comment-11324</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Kirwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 19:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearingdrift.com/?p=3751#comment-11324</guid>
		<description>Max, there&#039;s this little thing called &quot;the first amendment.&quot;  You might read about it sometime.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Max, there&#8217;s this little thing called &#8220;the first amendment.&#8221;  You might read about it sometime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Shapiro</title>
		<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2008/12/16/sessoms-strategist-debunks-flyergate/#comment-11321</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Shapiro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearingdrift.com/?p=3751#comment-11321</guid>
		<description>Hahahahaha, that really made me laugh. So there is a law saying the elections are supposed to be non-partisan and there is a flier portraying a candidate in a non-partisan election with a partisan candidate. The flier does not follow the law, the flier breaks the law, things against the law are illegal. Just because something is illegal does not necessarily mean there is a well defined punishment for the illegal action. This is a gray area that is huge when it comes to published regulations and not actual ordinances.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hahahahaha, that really made me laugh. So there is a law saying the elections are supposed to be non-partisan and there is a flier portraying a candidate in a non-partisan election with a partisan candidate. The flier does not follow the law, the flier breaks the law, things against the law are illegal. Just because something is illegal does not necessarily mean there is a well defined punishment for the illegal action. This is a gray area that is huge when it comes to published regulations and not actual ordinances.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Kirwin</title>
		<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2008/12/16/sessoms-strategist-debunks-flyergate/#comment-11316</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Kirwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearingdrift.com/?p=3751#comment-11316</guid>
		<description>Perhaps then you should be more careful about accusing people of illegality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps then you should be more careful about accusing people of illegality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Shapiro</title>
		<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2008/12/16/sessoms-strategist-debunks-flyergate/#comment-11314</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Shapiro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearingdrift.com/?p=3751#comment-11314</guid>
		<description>I was actually going to mention that in my 2nd post, I know the campaigns are supposed to be non-partisan, whether or not there is an actual city ordinance saying portraying a candidate with a partisan candidate is a crime is something I am not sure about. I remember reading about there being an actual law somewhere, but I cannot remember exactly where. I will look it up later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was actually going to mention that in my 2nd post, I know the campaigns are supposed to be non-partisan, whether or not there is an actual city ordinance saying portraying a candidate with a partisan candidate is a crime is something I am not sure about. I remember reading about there being an actual law somewhere, but I cannot remember exactly where. I will look it up later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LittleDavid</title>
		<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2008/12/16/sessoms-strategist-debunks-flyergate/#comment-11311</link>
		<dc:creator>LittleDavid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearingdrift.com/?p=3751#comment-11311</guid>
		<description>Brian,

And yeah, the Republicans then ended up with three candidates instead of only one.  I guess the other two siphoned off some votes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian,</p>
<p>And yeah, the Republicans then ended up with three candidates instead of only one.  I guess the other two siphoned off some votes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Kirwin</title>
		<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2008/12/16/sessoms-strategist-debunks-flyergate/#comment-11310</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Kirwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:19:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearingdrift.com/?p=3751#comment-11310</guid>
		<description>Max, where&#039;s the law about partisanship?  All &quot;non-partisan election&quot; means is that the parties don&#039;t nominate candidates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Max, where&#8217;s the law about partisanship?  All &#8220;non-partisan election&#8221; means is that the parties don&#8217;t nominate candidates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Shapiro</title>
		<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2008/12/16/sessoms-strategist-debunks-flyergate/#comment-11305</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Shapiro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 15:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearingdrift.com/?p=3751#comment-11305</guid>
		<description>Well Mrs. Haegley said she instructed all of her volunteers to check for that and then after hearing about the flier reminded them again. I also think they were illegal because it brought partisanship into a non-partisan election. 

&quot;Inside each bag: campaign authorized sample ballots w/ the Va Pilot endorsement, Sessoms stickers for the poll workers to wear, a list of election day “do’s and don’ts” rules from the SBE &amp; my contact info if anyone needed anything.&quot;

&quot;At that point I called all the precinct captains to make them aware of the flyer and to remind/instruct all the volunteers that we were only to pass out our materials &amp; they could verify this with the paid for by Will Sessoms clearly stated.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Mrs. Haegley said she instructed all of her volunteers to check for that and then after hearing about the flier reminded them again. I also think they were illegal because it brought partisanship into a non-partisan election. </p>
<p>&#8220;Inside each bag: campaign authorized sample ballots w/ the Va Pilot endorsement, Sessoms stickers for the poll workers to wear, a list of election day “do’s and don’ts” rules from the SBE &amp; my contact info if anyone needed anything.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;At that point I called all the precinct captains to make them aware of the flyer and to remind/instruct all the volunteers that we were only to pass out our materials &amp; they could verify this with the paid for by Will Sessoms clearly stated.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Kirwin</title>
		<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2008/12/16/sessoms-strategist-debunks-flyergate/#comment-11303</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Kirwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 15:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearingdrift.com/?p=3751#comment-11303</guid>
		<description>Max, the only thing illegal about the fliers was the missing disclaimer.  I doubt most election day campaign workers or volunteers are so knowledgeable about campaign advertising law to say &quot;Wow, this flier doesn&#039;t have &#039;paid for and authorized by&quot; in tiny print.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Max, the only thing illegal about the fliers was the missing disclaimer.  I doubt most election day campaign workers or volunteers are so knowledgeable about campaign advertising law to say &#8220;Wow, this flier doesn&#8217;t have &#8216;paid for and authorized by&#8221; in tiny print.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Shapiro</title>
		<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2008/12/16/sessoms-strategist-debunks-flyergate/#comment-11302</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Shapiro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 15:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearingdrift.com/?p=3751#comment-11302</guid>
		<description>No mention of the paid consultant saying someone gave him a box of the fliers...no mention of how those flier got into the hands of poll workers in black precincts, and comparing an election of two white males to two white females means absolutely nothing, except everything because apparently that is all that matters when forging a good comparison...

Sessoms got a huge chunk of money from special interests, this flier was apparently designed and distributed by paid campaign workers/consultants. I am not saying Sessoms knew about it or ordered it, but someone working on his behalf surely did. Guilt by association is more than applicable when it comes to an election and running a city.

Even if it did not sway peoples votes, which judging by your standards it should have (you compare two white guys and two white girls and said a correlation begets a fact...), it still is a crime because they were not stamped with a &quot;paid for by&quot; and they were clearly partisan and designed to influence peoples votes by less than intellectual means. 

Sessoms would have won with or without those flyers, this is true, so why did someone in his campaign feel the need to create them and pass them out? If your volunteers were all so stoked on Sessoms you would think they would have refused to give the fliers out like one worker was reported to have done...I am referring to the ones who drove the fliers to campaign workers to hand them out, not so much the actual people who handed them out. There were clearly numerous people who had to have had these fliers in their possession in order to account for the pattern of distribution. Where were these people saying no this is wrong and illegal?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No mention of the paid consultant saying someone gave him a box of the fliers&#8230;no mention of how those flier got into the hands of poll workers in black precincts, and comparing an election of two white males to two white females means absolutely nothing, except everything because apparently that is all that matters when forging a good comparison&#8230;</p>
<p>Sessoms got a huge chunk of money from special interests, this flier was apparently designed and distributed by paid campaign workers/consultants. I am not saying Sessoms knew about it or ordered it, but someone working on his behalf surely did. Guilt by association is more than applicable when it comes to an election and running a city.</p>
<p>Even if it did not sway peoples votes, which judging by your standards it should have (you compare two white guys and two white girls and said a correlation begets a fact&#8230;), it still is a crime because they were not stamped with a &#8220;paid for by&#8221; and they were clearly partisan and designed to influence peoples votes by less than intellectual means. </p>
<p>Sessoms would have won with or without those flyers, this is true, so why did someone in his campaign feel the need to create them and pass them out? If your volunteers were all so stoked on Sessoms you would think they would have refused to give the fliers out like one worker was reported to have done&#8230;I am referring to the ones who drove the fliers to campaign workers to hand them out, not so much the actual people who handed them out. There were clearly numerous people who had to have had these fliers in their possession in order to account for the pattern of distribution. Where were these people saying no this is wrong and illegal?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Kirwin</title>
		<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2008/12/16/sessoms-strategist-debunks-flyergate/#comment-11289</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Kirwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 11:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearingdrift.com/?p=3751#comment-11289</guid>
		<description>I also noticed that these precincts, like many others, perfectly matched the Virginian-Pilot&#039;s endorsements for Mayor and City Council.

The Pilot endorsed Glenn Nye for Congress, Mark Warner for Senate, Sessoms for Mayor, Wilson for Council, Glenn Davis for Council.

Do Vivian and Eileen think the Pilot endorsements were due to the flier too?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also noticed that these precincts, like many others, perfectly matched the Virginian-Pilot&#8217;s endorsements for Mayor and City Council.</p>
<p>The Pilot endorsed Glenn Nye for Congress, Mark Warner for Senate, Sessoms for Mayor, Wilson for Council, Glenn Davis for Council.</p>
<p>Do Vivian and Eileen think the Pilot endorsements were due to the flier too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eileen</title>
		<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2008/12/16/sessoms-strategist-debunks-flyergate/#comment-11284</link>
		<dc:creator>eileen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 11:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearingdrift.com/?p=3751#comment-11284</guid>
		<description>I worked for Sessoms.  Sessoms is a great guy.  He had many hard-working dedicated volunteers.  Therefore, he wasn&#039;t behind these fliers.

Plus if you compare Sessoms&#039; race to that of another white Republican businessman, you&#039;ll see the flier had no impact on the race outcome.

Wow!  Brilliant argument there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I worked for Sessoms.  Sessoms is a great guy.  He had many hard-working dedicated volunteers.  Therefore, he wasn&#8217;t behind these fliers.</p>
<p>Plus if you compare Sessoms&#8217; race to that of another white Republican businessman, you&#8217;ll see the flier had no impact on the race outcome.</p>
<p>Wow!  Brilliant argument there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Kirwin</title>
		<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2008/12/16/sessoms-strategist-debunks-flyergate/#comment-11283</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Kirwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 10:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearingdrift.com/?p=3751#comment-11283</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s right, Vivian.  Only use the information you like.  Ignore information that disproves your view.  Good reporting!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s right, Vivian.  Only use the information you like.  Ignore information that disproves your view.  Good reporting!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vivian J. Paige</title>
		<link>http://bearingdrift.com/2008/12/16/sessoms-strategist-debunks-flyergate/#comment-11277</link>
		<dc:creator>Vivian J. Paige</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 03:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearingdrift.com/?p=3751#comment-11277</guid>
		<description>I looked at the Glenn Davis numbers. Glenn Davis won almost everywhere in the whole city. That&#039;s why I didn&#039;t use his race as a control total. His opponent barely campaigned. Yes, both Davis and Sessoms are white male Republicans businessmen running against women. But the comparison ends there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I looked at the Glenn Davis numbers. Glenn Davis won almost everywhere in the whole city. That&#8217;s why I didn&#8217;t use his race as a control total. His opponent barely campaigned. Yes, both Davis and Sessoms are white male Republicans businessmen running against women. But the comparison ends there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

