Democrats think 3 equals 1
By | Tuesday, August 12th, 2008 | Policy

Gerrymandered Congressman Bobby Scott’s town meeting did Joel Rubin one better. Where Rubin’s televised debate stacked the deck 2-1 against exploring and drilling for our own energy resources, Scott’s panel was stacked 3-1 against. So much for “Yes We Can!”

Best comment? If America had a famine, Democrats would be telling farmers “We can’t plant our way out of this?”

Best Picture? Scott telling how many solutions Democrats are offering:


Tags:

Contribute for Conservatism!

Share this post

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed
  • Share this post on Delicious
  • StumbleUpon this post
  • Share this post on Digg
  • Tweet about this post
  • Share this post on Mixx
  • Share this post on Technorati
  • Share this post on Facebook
  • Share this post on NewsVine
  • Share this post on Reddit
  • Share this post on Google
  • Share this post on LinkedIn

About the author

Brian Kirwin

The right wants to jeer him. The left wants to censor him. Moderates usually want both. Brian Kirwin is a political consultant and public relations strategist in Virginia Beach with a lightning-rod flair. Brian also serves on the VB Arts & Humanities Commission and frequently appears on Hampton Roads theatrical stages, if only to prove that all actors aren’t liberals. Kirwin’s columns stir up debate and hit the political scene with no punches pulled.

Comments

2 Responses to "Democrats think 3 equals 1"
  1. LittleDavid August 12, 2008 17:13 pm

    I am in favor of drilling in ANWR and offshore.

    However I am also in favor of expanding our efforts towards coming up with alternative energy.

    I think the answer lies in the middle. Increase domestic drilling to decrease our dependance on foreign oil. Redouble our efforts to come up with alternative energy solutions to decrease our dependance on foreign oil.

    What’s wrong with doing both at the same time? We do not have to choose either one or the other, we can choose both. That’s what I choose. If we are going to break loose of our dependance on foreign oil I think both steps will be required.

  2. John Harvie August 14, 2008 09:37 am

    Let’s not have any more hairbrained ideas like ethanol, however. That eloquently illustrates the “law of unintended consequences”.

Leave your response

The comments section is for meaningful discussion. Readers are reminded to post comments that are germane to the article and write in a common language that steers clear of personal attacks and/or vulgarities.

Please take a moment to review our comment policy.