McCain unveils economic plan

       
By J.R. Hoeft
Published July 7th, 2008  

Getting economists to agree is a challenge in and of itself. Getting Nobel prize winning economists, American Economic Association presidents, U.S. Treasury secretaries and under secretaries, OMB Directors, members of the President’s Council of Economic Advisors, Congressional Budget Office directors, and more economists from the academic and business community to the tune of over 300 is quite another.

However, Sen. John McCain’s plan to revitalize the economy has economists from all across the country singing its praises:

“His plan would control government spending by vetoing every bill with earmarks, implementing a constitutionally valid line-item veto, pausing non-military discretionary government spending programs for one year to stop their explosive growth and place accountability on federal government agencies.

“His plan would keep taxes from rising, because higher tax rates are exactly the wrong policy to restore economic growth, especially at this time.

“His plan would reduce tax rates by cutting the tax that corporations pay to 25 percent in line with other countries, by completely phasing out the alternative minimum tax, by increasing the exemption for dependents, by permitting the first-year expensing of new equipment and technology, and by making permanent a reformed tax credit for R&D.

“His plan would also create a new and much simpler tax system and give Americans a free choice of whether to pay taxes under that simple system or the current complex and burdensome income tax.

“His plan would open new markets for American goods and services and thereby create additional jobs for Americans by supporting good free trade agreements, such as the one with Colombia, and working with leaders around the world to avoid isolationism and protectionism. His plan would also reform education, retraining, and other assistance programs so they better help those displaced by trade and other changes in the economy. His plan addresses problems in the financial markets and housing markets by calling for increased transparency and accountability, by targeted assistance to deserving homeowners to refinance their mortgages, and by opposing so-called reform plans which would raise the costs of home-ownership in the future.

“The above actions, as well as plans to address entitlement programs — especially Social Security, Medicare and other government health care programs — and his regulatory reforms — especially in the area of health care — constitute a broad and powerful economic agenda. Because of John McCain’s experience working with the American people in all walks of life, with members of Congress on both sides of the aisle, and with leaders around the world, we are optimistic that these plans will become a reality and will create jobs and restore confidence and strong economic growth.”

McCain also pledged to balance the budget in a speech in Denver today:

“We must also get government’s fiscal house in order. American workers and families pay their bills and balance their budgets, and I will demand the same of the government. A government that spends wisely and balances its budget is a catalyst for economic growth and the creation of good and secure jobs.”

Comments

3 Responses to “McCain unveils economic plan”

  1. SicSemperTyrannusNo Gravatar on July 8th, 2008 at 6:47 am

    Thanks for this info. Finally, a reason to be FOR McCain other than the “lesser of two evils”.

  2. LittleDavidNo Gravatar on July 8th, 2008 at 9:32 am

    Personally I find things to dislike about both McCain’s and Obama’s economic proposals.

    While hundreds of economists (I guess they are supply siders) are pleased by McCain’s proposals, not all the experts are convinced.

    A MSN Money Central piece provides some comparison of the candidate’s proposals.

    I am going to lift some quotes from the piece.

    On McCain:

    “A Tax Policy Center analysis said McCain’s tax proposals, excluding those addressing health care, would reduce tax revenue by $3.7 trillion over the next 10 years, or approximately 10% of the revenue scheduled for collection under current law.”

    On Obama:

    A Tax Policy Center… “report estimated that Obama’s tax proposals, excluding those addressing health care, would reduce tax revenue by $2.7 trillion over the next 10 years, or approximately 7% of the revenue scheduled for collection under current law.

    Both candidates seem to be ignoring our skyrocketing federal deficit.

    Now, if either candidate could show show where they intended to reduce spending, perhaps the tax cuts wouldn’t be so awful. But I would want to see concrete figures such as what percentage of current spending will be reduced in which areas. Will they cut transportation, defense, Social Security, Veterans benefits, education or would the cuts come from any number of other areas?

    Just saying they’ll eliminate earmarks is not going to amount to any real savings. Getting rid of earmarks might not be a bad idea, but earmarks do not necessarily increase spending in the areas of the budget where they are used. Earmarks only direct where, specifically, appropriated money must be spent.

  3. Stephen GunterNo Gravatar on July 8th, 2008 at 4:10 pm

    I like some of these proposals, although it really seems like empty words. Does anyone know where he discusses his methods for implementing his plan?

    Plus, earmarks are money that is already allocated, so what good will it do to eliminate them? Does he want to control where that money will be spent? I mean, if the power of the locally elected official to spend the money allocated for his/her district where they best see fit is taken away, who will take over that responsibility?

Feel free to leave a comment...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!