Mis-Deeds: Questionable ethics in Dascher appointment

By J.R. | April 28, 2008
Filed Under General Assembly, Judges |

Laura Dascher of Bath County is a partner in the Covington law firm of Pasco and Dascher PLC. The firm gave $2500 to the Future Deeds Campaign in Dec. 2007.

That, in and of itself, is fine. But it’s not the whole story.

Laura Dascher was a “non-negotiable” appointment by Sen. Deeds to the Juvenile Domestic Relations Court, according to House sources. Apparently, Deeds was so adamant about this appointment, he was willing to hold up two circuit court appointments to make it happen.

He eventually got his way last Wednesday when Dascher’s appointment was approved (however, several delegates abstained).

Most of the case load for this particular judicial seat is 90 minutes from Covington; at least 60% of the cases are heard in Augusta, Staunton, and Waynesboro. Why would Deeds be so adamant about ensuring Dascher was the appointee?

So, it’s kind of interesting that a person who had been a substitute judge since Apr. 2007, donated $2500 to Sen. Deeds — her chief patron — in December, and lives 90 minutes from where most of the cases are heard, would suddenly become a “non-negotiable” appointment.

After learning of Sen. Yvonne Miller’s demands this weekend and now this, it seems like gaining power in the senate last election has created some questionable ethical behavior by Senate Democrats.

Is it coincidence, or is there a little quid pro quo between Deeds and Ms. Dascher?

UPDATE: The Deeds campaign replied to the ‘Drift this afternoon with the following explanation as to why Ms. Dascher was the senator’s first choice.

“[Laura Dascher] was the candidate endorsed by the bar association. Additionally, Senator Deeds’ felt it was important to have a judge from that part of the district–I think it’s been 14 years since that’s been the case,” wrote Peter Jackson, Deeds for Virginia campaign manager to Bearing Drift today via e-mail. “Laura is an extraordinarily talented lawyer, especially in trying the Juvenile & Domestic Relations cases that she’ll be hearing from the bench.”

AddThis Feed Button

Comments

5 Responses to “Mis-Deeds: Questionable ethics in Dascher appointment”

  1. Riley on April 28th, 2008 11:28 am

    Dirty Deeds Done Not Quite Dirt Cheap…

  2. Dirty Deeds Done Not Quite Dirt Cheap… « Virginia Virtucon on April 28th, 2008 11:34 am

    […] of campaign cash to Creigh “Dirty” Deeds for a judicial appointment. Head on over to Bearing Drift for all the […]

  3. Bolling reacts to judicial appointment ethics questions | Bearing Drift on April 28th, 2008 4:10 pm

    […] has hijacked the judicial appointment process in Norfolk and Virginia Beach and Sen. Creigh Deeds accepted campaign money from an appointee’s law firm (where she is one of two partners) before he strongly advocated […]

  4. Brian Kirwin on April 29th, 2008 12:21 pm

    Judgeships $2500? Boy, Deeds doesn’t know the market very well.

    I’d figured he would’ve gotten $10,000 easy.

  5. Senate Dems setting new standards for ethics | Bearing Drift on May 2nd, 2008 6:46 am

    […] blocking the unanimous choice of the elected officials of both parties who actually live there. Sen. Creigh Deeds handed a judgeship to a $2500 […]

Leave a Reply