Kaine poised to break tax promise

       
By Brian Kirwin
Published April 9th, 2008  

“Kaine, the lieutenant governor, said he is opposed to increasing Virginia’s tax of 17.5 cents per gallon on gas and will veto any tax increases for roads until the state passes a constitutional amendment that prohibits lawmakers from using money in the transportation fund for other purposes.” Washington Post October 9, 2005

Seems that’s out the window, like Kaine’s promise to implement the death penalty. RTD reports that Kaine’s huddled with his tax friends and a poll that shows Virginians truly want their taxes raised.

Well, if that’s true, let’s test it! Let’s have a referendum.

Comments

6 Responses to “Kaine poised to break tax promise”

  1. Reid GreenmunNo Gravatar on April 9th, 2008 at 4:00 pm

    He also ran on a platform of opposing regional authorities - his opponet, Jerry Kilgore, supported regional authorities.

    It seems that Gov. Kaine figures what the heck, just say whatever to get elected.

    Of course, that is not a Democratic failure in ethics or a Republican failure in ethics, it is a common practice for many politicians.

  2. TomtNo Gravatar on April 9th, 2008 at 4:31 pm

    I’m pretty sure VA doesn’t do referendums:

    http://www.iandrinstitute.org/Virginia.htm

  3. Brian KirwinNo Gravatar on April 9th, 2008 at 6:14 pm

    For a state that doesn’t do referendums, we sure have a lot of them.

  4. Ian JordanNo Gravatar on April 9th, 2008 at 6:17 pm

    Believe it or not Brian, the state has to actually use money to build and pay for things. Populations grow and so do our demands, and spending cuts arent enough…sometimes.

  5. J.R.No Gravatar on April 9th, 2008 at 6:51 pm

    Ian,
    No one on this blog has ever denied that you get what you pay for…in fact, it might be our motto.

  6. WallyNo Gravatar on April 10th, 2008 at 2:02 pm

    Actually Ian, that is not entirely accurate. The Commonwealth (not state) in fact borrows, by issuing bonds, and then uses borrowed money to build and pay for things. In the current economic environment additional new borrowing, and issuing low interest tax free bonds is not exactly economic stimulus. Compounded with the fact we must compete with worldwide emerging economies for materials and given the weaker purchasing power of the U.S. dollar the game has change. Granted we must maintain what we have, but expanding public framework at this juncture is just not prudent. Also, population grows? I think if you look at the demo graphs, you will find regional growth, at least on the Southside is relatively flat.

Feel free to leave a comment...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!