Post Offices or National Security? Dems choose post offices

       
By J.R. Hoeft
Published March 19th, 2008  

If the Democratic leadership in the House is so against the “Protect America Act”, then just vote on it. It’s interesting, but for all their rhetoric in 2006, they sure are a party of little action.


(h/t: The Freedom Project)

Comments

4 Responses to “Post Offices or National Security? Dems choose post offices”

  1. RagnarNo Gravatar on March 19th, 2008 at 10:34 am

    You’ve got to love the political minds who name bills in a manner such as the “Protect America Act”. Who could vote against that?

    It’s even better than they “Protect Cute Fuzzy Bunnies and Chicks Act” proposed in 2002 which would have allowed drilling in Anwar and the clubbing of baby seals for sport…

  2. Brian KirwinNo Gravatar on March 19th, 2008 at 11:02 am

    I heard Teddy Kennedy wanted to co-sponsor “Protect Cute Fuzzy Bunnies and Chicks Act” until he found out it had nothing to do with the Playboy mansion.

  3. J.R.No Gravatar on March 19th, 2008 at 11:37 am

    Ragnar,
    Apparently most Democrats in the House…but not all. Which is why the bill is stalled.

  4. Jeremy HintonNo Gravatar on March 20th, 2008 at 1:08 am

    That man who sees inaction in action and action in inaction is wise among men;

    – Bhagavad-Gita, 4-18

Feel free to leave a comment...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!