Post Offices or National Security? Dems choose post offices
By JR Hoeft | Wednesday, March 19th, 2008 | Catch-AllIf the Democratic leadership in the House is so against the “Protect America Act”, then just vote on it. It’s interesting, but for all their rhetoric in 2006, they sure are a party of little action.
(h/t: The Freedom Project)
Tags:
Contribute for Conservatism!
Share this post
About the author
JR Hoeft
Conservative to the core; liberal with his opinion! J.R. has been involved in politics for over a decade and has worked on several campaigns in Hampton Roads. He has served on the Executive Committee of the Republican Party of Chesapeake and the Central Committee of the Republican Party of Virginia. He is also the director of “Blogs United” in Virginia. E-mail J.R.. Follow J.R. on Twitter.
We're 75% there! Thank you to everyone who has so far contributed! Just $2000 to go!
Comments
4 Responses to "Post Offices or National Security? Dems choose post offices"
You’ve got to love the political minds who name bills in a manner such as the “Protect America Act”. Who could vote against that?
It’s even better than they “Protect Cute Fuzzy Bunnies and Chicks Act” proposed in 2002 which would have allowed drilling in Anwar and the clubbing of baby seals for sport…
I heard Teddy Kennedy wanted to co-sponsor “Protect Cute Fuzzy Bunnies and Chicks Act” until he found out it had nothing to do with the Playboy mansion.
Ragnar,
Apparently most Democrats in the House…but not all. Which is why the bill is stalled.
That man who sees inaction in action and action in inaction is wise among men;
– Bhagavad-Gita, 4-18
Leave your response